Development, psychometric properties, and cutoff scores of the Polish version of the 20-item Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20) in a chronic pain sample.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Joanna Kłosowska,Daryna Rubanets,Karolina Wiercioch-Kuzianik,Elżbieta A Bajcar,Magdalena Żegleń,Magdalena Niedbał,Julia Badzińska,Helena Bieniek,Justyna Brączyk,Izabela A Łaska,Anna Przeklasa-Muszyńska,Lance M McCracken,Przemysław Bąbel
{"title":"Development, psychometric properties, and cutoff scores of the Polish version of the 20-item Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20) in a chronic pain sample.","authors":"Joanna Kłosowska,Daryna Rubanets,Karolina Wiercioch-Kuzianik,Elżbieta A Bajcar,Magdalena Żegleń,Magdalena Niedbał,Julia Badzińska,Helena Bieniek,Justyna Brączyk,Izabela A Łaska,Anna Przeklasa-Muszyńska,Lance M McCracken,Przemysław Bąbel","doi":"10.1037/pas0001376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fear and avoidance remain important concepts for understanding chronic pain. The objective of our research was to develop and evaluate a Polish version of a measure to assess these concepts: the 20-item Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20). The goal also included establishing a cutoff score to differentiate between individuals with a high level of pain-related disability and those with lower levels. The scale underwent back-translation into Polish, and two studies were conducted among individuals reporting chronic pain: in a large online sample (N = 418; 60% women, 40% men; age: 19-86, M = 49), and in a hospital-recruited sample (N = 148; 77% women, 22% men; age: 18-85; M = 57). We assessed validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses supported both a model with four correlated factors-cognitive anxiety, physiological responses, avoidance, and fearful thinking-and a hierarchical model with four lower order factors and a higher order factor representing general pain anxiety. There was no evidence of ceiling or floor effects. Cronbach's αs exceeded .82 and .76 for the online and hospital-recruited samples, respectively, indicating robust internal consistency. The translated PASS-20 scores showed moderate test-retest reliability and positively correlated with pain catastrophizing, depression, stress, anxiety, and pain intensity. Women and individuals with disabilities reported higher scores. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined an optimal cutoff score of 52 or above to distinguish highly disabled individuals with 82.35% sensitivity and 58.86% specificity. A minimal detectable change of 26.81 for the PASS-20 total score was identified. The Polish PASS-20 provides valid and reliable scores for measuring pain-related anxiety. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"12 1","pages":"e28-e44"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fear and avoidance remain important concepts for understanding chronic pain. The objective of our research was to develop and evaluate a Polish version of a measure to assess these concepts: the 20-item Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20). The goal also included establishing a cutoff score to differentiate between individuals with a high level of pain-related disability and those with lower levels. The scale underwent back-translation into Polish, and two studies were conducted among individuals reporting chronic pain: in a large online sample (N = 418; 60% women, 40% men; age: 19-86, M = 49), and in a hospital-recruited sample (N = 148; 77% women, 22% men; age: 18-85; M = 57). We assessed validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses supported both a model with four correlated factors-cognitive anxiety, physiological responses, avoidance, and fearful thinking-and a hierarchical model with four lower order factors and a higher order factor representing general pain anxiety. There was no evidence of ceiling or floor effects. Cronbach's αs exceeded .82 and .76 for the online and hospital-recruited samples, respectively, indicating robust internal consistency. The translated PASS-20 scores showed moderate test-retest reliability and positively correlated with pain catastrophizing, depression, stress, anxiety, and pain intensity. Women and individuals with disabilities reported higher scores. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined an optimal cutoff score of 52 or above to distinguish highly disabled individuals with 82.35% sensitivity and 58.86% specificity. A minimal detectable change of 26.81 for the PASS-20 total score was identified. The Polish PASS-20 provides valid and reliable scores for measuring pain-related anxiety. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
波兰版20项疼痛焦虑症状量表(PASS-20)在慢性疼痛样本中的发展、心理测量特性和截止分数。
恐惧和回避仍然是理解慢性疼痛的重要概念。我们的研究目标是开发和评估波兰语版本的评估这些概念的量表:20 项疼痛焦虑症状量表 (PASS-20)。我们的目标还包括确定一个临界分数,以区分与疼痛相关的残疾程度较高的个体和程度较低的个体。我们将该量表反译成波兰语,并在报告慢性疼痛的患者中进行了两项研究:一项是大型在线样本(N = 418;60% 为女性,40% 为男性;年龄:19-86 岁,男性 = 49 岁),另一项是医院招募的样本(N = 148;77% 为女性,22% 为男性;年龄:18-85 岁,男性 = 57 岁)。我们对有效性、内部一致性和测试再测可靠性进行了评估。确认性因子分析支持一个包含四个相关因子(认知焦虑、生理反应、回避和恐惧思维)的模型,以及一个包含四个低阶因子和一个代表一般疼痛焦虑的高阶因子的层次模型。没有证据表明存在上限或下限效应。在线样本和医院招募样本的 Cronbach's α 分别超过了 0.82 和 0.76,表明其内部一致性良好。翻译后的 PASS-20 分数显示出中等程度的测试再测可靠性,并与疼痛灾难化、抑郁、压力、焦虑和疼痛强度呈正相关。女性和残障人士的得分更高。接收器操作特征分析确定了 52 分或以上的最佳临界值,以 82.35% 的灵敏度和 58.86% 的特异性区分高度残疾的个体。PASS-20 总分的最小可检测变化为 26.81。波兰的 PASS-20 可为疼痛相关焦虑的测量提供有效、可靠的分数。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2025 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信