Jose Cesario Pinto, Brian Arnall, Nathan Mueller, Guillermo R. Balboa, Laila A. Puntel
{"title":"Evaluation of static and sensor-based nitrogen recommendation models for winter wheat","authors":"Jose Cesario Pinto, Brian Arnall, Nathan Mueller, Guillermo R. Balboa, Laila A. Puntel","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nitrogen (N) management is crucial to increase winter wheat production. Improved prediction of the economic optimal N rates (EONR) for winter wheat could increase N use efficiency and farmers' profits. However, characterization of the variability in the EONR and the performance of existing dynamic and static N recommendation models have been limited. The objectives were (i) to characterize winter wheat yield and protein content response to N rate and timing and (ii) to evaluate the performance of static and dynamic N recommendation models. Nine experiments across 2 years were conducted in eastern Nebraska to evaluate N rate recommendation models and N application timing. Dynamic models included Oklahoma State University, Holland and Schepers, and Kansas State University remote sensing-based N recommendations. Static N recommendation models included empirical equations from the University of Nebraska–Lincoln and Kansas State University. The EONR ranged across site-years from 57 to 150 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>, yield at the EONR from 3.33 to 7.51 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>, and protein at the EONR from 11.1% to 16.4%. There was no significant effect of the timing of N application on grain yield and protein content. Dynamic N recommendations performed better than static models based on an average difference from the observed EONR (±14.8 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> and 46.0 ± 83 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively). Further testing of N winter wheat recommendation models is needed to better inform winter wheat growers about N management and fine-tuned N recommendations to current management practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70063","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nitrogen (N) management is crucial to increase winter wheat production. Improved prediction of the economic optimal N rates (EONR) for winter wheat could increase N use efficiency and farmers' profits. However, characterization of the variability in the EONR and the performance of existing dynamic and static N recommendation models have been limited. The objectives were (i) to characterize winter wheat yield and protein content response to N rate and timing and (ii) to evaluate the performance of static and dynamic N recommendation models. Nine experiments across 2 years were conducted in eastern Nebraska to evaluate N rate recommendation models and N application timing. Dynamic models included Oklahoma State University, Holland and Schepers, and Kansas State University remote sensing-based N recommendations. Static N recommendation models included empirical equations from the University of Nebraska–Lincoln and Kansas State University. The EONR ranged across site-years from 57 to 150 kg N ha−1, yield at the EONR from 3.33 to 7.51 Mg ha−1, and protein at the EONR from 11.1% to 16.4%. There was no significant effect of the timing of N application on grain yield and protein content. Dynamic N recommendations performed better than static models based on an average difference from the observed EONR (±14.8 kg N ha−1 and 46.0 ± 83 kg N ha−1, respectively). Further testing of N winter wheat recommendation models is needed to better inform winter wheat growers about N management and fine-tuned N recommendations to current management practices.
氮素管理是冬小麦增产的关键。改进冬小麦经济最优施氮量(EONR)预测,可提高氮素利用效率和农户效益。然而,对EONR变异性的表征以及现有的动态和静态N推荐模型的性能都受到了限制。目的是(i)表征冬小麦产量和蛋白质含量对施氮量和施氮时间的响应;(ii)评价静态和动态施氮推荐模型的性能。在内布拉斯加州东部进行了为期2年的9个试验,以评价氮素推荐模型和施氮时机。动态模型包括俄克拉荷马州立大学、荷兰和谢珀斯大学,以及堪萨斯州立大学基于遥感的氮建议。静态氮推荐模型包括内布拉斯加大学林肯分校和堪萨斯州立大学的经验方程。EONR在57 ~ 150 kg N ha−1之间,产量在3.33 ~ 7.51 Mg ha−1之间,蛋白质含量在11.1% ~ 16.4%之间。施氮时间对籽粒产量和蛋白质含量无显著影响。基于与观测到的EONR的平均差异(分别为±14.8 kg N ha - 1和46.0±83 kg N ha - 1),动态N建议优于静态模型。需要进一步测试氮素冬小麦推荐模型,以便更好地向冬小麦种植者提供有关氮素管理的信息,并根据当前的管理实践调整氮素建议。
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.