Neurophysiological Differences in Auditory Threat Processing in Young Children Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: a Pilot Study

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Brandon L. Goldstein, Olivia Arciero, Samantha Santos, Damion J. Grasso, Inge-Marie Eigsti, Fumiko Hoeft, Charles J. Williams, Anusha Mohan, Emily Mohler, Kimberly J. McCarthy, Margaret J. Briggs-Gowan
{"title":"Neurophysiological Differences in Auditory Threat Processing in Young Children Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: a Pilot Study","authors":"Brandon L. Goldstein,&nbsp;Olivia Arciero,&nbsp;Samantha Santos,&nbsp;Damion J. Grasso,&nbsp;Inge-Marie Eigsti,&nbsp;Fumiko Hoeft,&nbsp;Charles J. Williams,&nbsp;Anusha Mohan,&nbsp;Emily Mohler,&nbsp;Kimberly J. McCarthy,&nbsp;Margaret J. Briggs-Gowan","doi":"10.1002/dev.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Threat reactivity is a mechanism linking children's exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) and mental health outcomes. Most studies focus on visual threats, with few examining auditory threat—a salient aspect of IPV exposure. This pilot study examines auditory threats in IPV-exposed children with event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited during an auditory affective oddball task. Children (<i>N</i> = 37, ages 4–7) were presented with four auditory cues: (1) standard cues with neutral prosody (<i>dada</i>; 70% of trials), (2) deviant or oddball cues with neutral prosody (<i>baba</i>; 10% of trials), (3) happy prosody deviant cues (<i>dada</i>; 10% of trials), and (4) angry prosody deviant cues (<i>dada</i>; 10% of trails). We analyzed the P3, an ERP index of emotionally salient or novel stimuli occurring 250–350 ms post-stimulus onset. Compared to non-exposed children, IPV-exposed children had smaller mean differences between P3 amplitudes than angry and standard cues, suggesting an altered appraisal and blunted emotional response to auditory threat. This blunted response was significantly associated with mother-reported child posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. These findings provide preliminary evidence of neurophysiological distinctions in auditory threat processing in children exposed to IPV, underscoring the need for further research examining auditory threat.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11086,"journal":{"name":"Developmental psychobiology","volume":"67 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental psychobiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dev.70045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Threat reactivity is a mechanism linking children's exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) and mental health outcomes. Most studies focus on visual threats, with few examining auditory threat—a salient aspect of IPV exposure. This pilot study examines auditory threats in IPV-exposed children with event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited during an auditory affective oddball task. Children (N = 37, ages 4–7) were presented with four auditory cues: (1) standard cues with neutral prosody (dada; 70% of trials), (2) deviant or oddball cues with neutral prosody (baba; 10% of trials), (3) happy prosody deviant cues (dada; 10% of trials), and (4) angry prosody deviant cues (dada; 10% of trails). We analyzed the P3, an ERP index of emotionally salient or novel stimuli occurring 250–350 ms post-stimulus onset. Compared to non-exposed children, IPV-exposed children had smaller mean differences between P3 amplitudes than angry and standard cues, suggesting an altered appraisal and blunted emotional response to auditory threat. This blunted response was significantly associated with mother-reported child posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. These findings provide preliminary evidence of neurophysiological distinctions in auditory threat processing in children exposed to IPV, underscoring the need for further research examining auditory threat.

接触亲密伴侣暴力的幼儿听觉威胁加工的神经生理差异:一项初步研究
威胁反应是一种将儿童暴露于亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)与心理健康结果联系起来的机制。大多数研究集中在视觉威胁上,很少有研究听觉威胁——这是IPV暴露的一个突出方面。本初步研究探讨了在听觉情感古怪任务中引发事件相关脑电位(ERPs)的ipvv暴露儿童的听觉威胁。37名4-7岁儿童接受4种听觉线索:(1)中性韵律的标准线索(哒哒;70%的试验),(2)异常或古怪的线索与中性韵律(baba;(3)快乐韵律异常提示(哒哒;10%的试验)和(4)愤怒的韵律异常线索(哒哒;10%的小径)。我们分析了P3,一种情绪显著性或新奇刺激在刺激发生250-350 ms后的ERP指数。与未暴露的儿童相比,暴露于ipvv的儿童P3振幅的平均差异小于愤怒和标准线索,这表明他们对听觉威胁的评价和情绪反应发生了改变。这种迟钝的反应与母亲报告的儿童创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状显著相关。这些发现为暴露于IPV的儿童在听觉威胁处理方面的神经生理差异提供了初步证据,强调了进一步研究听觉威胁的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Developmental psychobiology
Developmental psychobiology 生物-发育生物学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
18.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Developmental Psychobiology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research papers from the disciplines of psychology, biology, neuroscience, and medicine that contribute to an understanding of behavior development. Research that focuses on development in the embryo/fetus, neonate, juvenile, or adult animal and multidisciplinary research that relates behavioral development to anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, genetics, or evolution is appropriate. The journal represents a broad phylogenetic perspective on behavior development by publishing studies of invertebrates, fish, birds, humans, and other animals. The journal publishes experimental and descriptive studies whether carried out in the laboratory or field. The journal also publishes review articles and theoretical papers that make important conceptual contributions. Special dedicated issues of Developmental Psychobiology , consisting of invited papers on a topic of general interest, may be arranged with the Editor-in-Chief. Developmental Psychobiology also publishes Letters to the Editor, which discuss issues of general interest or material published in the journal. Letters discussing published material may correct errors, provide clarification, or offer a different point of view. Authors should consult the editors on the preparation of these contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信