Optimizing Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Neurography of the Brachial Plexus With Delayed Scanning

iRadiology Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1002/ird3.120
Jun Xu, Xiaoli Hu, Xiaoyun Su, Shen Gui, Ziqiao Lei, Xiaoming Liu, Xiangzhi Zhou, Lixia Wang, Wenjun Wu, Xiangchuang Kong
{"title":"Optimizing Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Neurography of the Brachial Plexus With Delayed Scanning","authors":"Jun Xu,&nbsp;Xiaoli Hu,&nbsp;Xiaoyun Su,&nbsp;Shen Gui,&nbsp;Ziqiao Lei,&nbsp;Xiaoming Liu,&nbsp;Xiangzhi Zhou,&nbsp;Lixia Wang,&nbsp;Wenjun Wu,&nbsp;Xiangchuang Kong","doi":"10.1002/ird3.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neurography (ceMRN) can enhance brachial plexus visualization and quality of imaging. However, the interval between contrast injection and scanning that provides the highest-quality images is not known.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen patients underwent brachial plexus imaging using the 3D T2-NerveView sequence with a scanning duration of 5 min. A consecutive six-phase scan was initiated immediately at the start of contrast agent injection. Subsequently, all patients' images were classified into six groups according to the phases: group A (phase 1, delay 0 min), group B (phase 2, delay 5 min), group C (phase 3, delay 10 min), group D (phase 4, delay 15 min), group E (phase 5, delay 20 min), and group F (phase 6, delay 25 min). The image quality in each group was assessed based on nerve signal (signal<sub>nerve</sub>), muscle signal (signal<sub>muscle</sub>), lymph node signal (signal<sub>lymph node</sub>), background noise (BN), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and subjective score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Signal<sub>nerve</sub>, signal<sub>muscle</sub>, BN, and SNR did not significantly differ among the six groups (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). However, significant differences (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) were observed in signal<sub>lymph node</sub> (<i>F</i> = 16.067), CNR (<i>F</i> = 9.495), and subjective score (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 23.586). As the scanning delay increased, signal<sub>lymph node</sub> intensity gradually increased whereas the CNR gradually decreased. The subjective score was significantly higher in groups B (4.83 ± 0.24), C (4.90 ± 0.21), D (4.87 ± 0.30), E (4.83 ± 0.31), and F (4.83 ± 0.31) than in group A (4.47 ± 0.30).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We recommend performing brachial plexus ceMRN 5 min after contrast injection. With this delay, the brachial plexus can be visualized optimally with minimal interference from background signals.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"3 2","pages":"168-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.120","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iRadiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird3.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neurography (ceMRN) can enhance brachial plexus visualization and quality of imaging. However, the interval between contrast injection and scanning that provides the highest-quality images is not known.

Methods

Fifteen patients underwent brachial plexus imaging using the 3D T2-NerveView sequence with a scanning duration of 5 min. A consecutive six-phase scan was initiated immediately at the start of contrast agent injection. Subsequently, all patients' images were classified into six groups according to the phases: group A (phase 1, delay 0 min), group B (phase 2, delay 5 min), group C (phase 3, delay 10 min), group D (phase 4, delay 15 min), group E (phase 5, delay 20 min), and group F (phase 6, delay 25 min). The image quality in each group was assessed based on nerve signal (signalnerve), muscle signal (signalmuscle), lymph node signal (signallymph node), background noise (BN), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and subjective score.

Results

Signalnerve, signalmuscle, BN, and SNR did not significantly differ among the six groups (p > 0.05). However, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed in signallymph node (F = 16.067), CNR (F = 9.495), and subjective score (χ2 = 23.586). As the scanning delay increased, signallymph node intensity gradually increased whereas the CNR gradually decreased. The subjective score was significantly higher in groups B (4.83 ± 0.24), C (4.90 ± 0.21), D (4.87 ± 0.30), E (4.83 ± 0.31), and F (4.83 ± 0.31) than in group A (4.47 ± 0.30).

Conclusion

We recommend performing brachial plexus ceMRN 5 min after contrast injection. With this delay, the brachial plexus can be visualized optimally with minimal interference from background signals.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信