Knife-assisted full-thickness resection guided by the pocket-detection method for posterior deeply invasive rectal cancer: A novel endoscopic approach (with video)

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70116
Maria Eva Argenziano, Andrea Sorge, Anne Hoorens, Michele Montori, Pieter Jan Poortmans, Sander Smeets, Tamas Tornai, Lynn K. Debels, Lobke Desomer, David J. Tate
{"title":"Knife-assisted full-thickness resection guided by the pocket-detection method for posterior deeply invasive rectal cancer: A novel endoscopic approach (with video)","authors":"Maria Eva Argenziano,&nbsp;Andrea Sorge,&nbsp;Anne Hoorens,&nbsp;Michele Montori,&nbsp;Pieter Jan Poortmans,&nbsp;Sander Smeets,&nbsp;Tamas Tornai,&nbsp;Lynn K. Debels,&nbsp;Lobke Desomer,&nbsp;David J. Tate","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Local full-thickness resection techniques for rectal cancer are limited by lesion size, location, or poor margin delineation. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic knife-assisted full-thickness resection (kFTR) guided by the pocket-detection method (PDM) for deeply invasive rectal cancer.</p><p>Consecutive posterior-lateral rectal lesions suspected of deep submucosal invasion treated at a tertiary care center from February to October 2024 were retrospectively included. kFTR guided by PDM involved creating a submucosal pocket to detect and isolate the suspected invasive component (muscle-retracting sign), followed by muscularis propria incision and full-thickness resection.</p><p>Technical success, accuracy of detecting deep submucosal invasion, and en-bloc resection rates were 100%. The median procedure time was 141.5 [IQR 123.7–179.5] minutes and the median hospitalization was 1 [IQR 1–7] day. No adverse events occurred. Histopathology showed R1-vertical margin in patient 1 (pT2 adenocarcinoma) and R0 resection in patients 2, 3, and 4 (pT1bsm3) after refinement of the procedure to include a ≥3 mm muscularis propria margin around the suspected invasive component. There was no recurrence at the first endoscopic follow-up of patients 1, 2, and 4. Patient 3 was sent to surgical low anterior resection due to multiple high-risk histological features. The previous kFTR did not impair surgery (no residual rectal carcinoma and 1/17 positive lymph nodes).</p><p>Endoscopic kFTR guided by the PDM may be a feasible organ-preserving treatment for the detection and resection of deeply invasive posterior rectal cancer. Future studies are needed to ascertain whether rectal kFTR could represent a viable alternative to conventional surgical local excision techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70116","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Local full-thickness resection techniques for rectal cancer are limited by lesion size, location, or poor margin delineation. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic knife-assisted full-thickness resection (kFTR) guided by the pocket-detection method (PDM) for deeply invasive rectal cancer.

Consecutive posterior-lateral rectal lesions suspected of deep submucosal invasion treated at a tertiary care center from February to October 2024 were retrospectively included. kFTR guided by PDM involved creating a submucosal pocket to detect and isolate the suspected invasive component (muscle-retracting sign), followed by muscularis propria incision and full-thickness resection.

Technical success, accuracy of detecting deep submucosal invasion, and en-bloc resection rates were 100%. The median procedure time was 141.5 [IQR 123.7–179.5] minutes and the median hospitalization was 1 [IQR 1–7] day. No adverse events occurred. Histopathology showed R1-vertical margin in patient 1 (pT2 adenocarcinoma) and R0 resection in patients 2, 3, and 4 (pT1bsm3) after refinement of the procedure to include a ≥3 mm muscularis propria margin around the suspected invasive component. There was no recurrence at the first endoscopic follow-up of patients 1, 2, and 4. Patient 3 was sent to surgical low anterior resection due to multiple high-risk histological features. The previous kFTR did not impair surgery (no residual rectal carcinoma and 1/17 positive lymph nodes).

Endoscopic kFTR guided by the PDM may be a feasible organ-preserving treatment for the detection and resection of deeply invasive posterior rectal cancer. Future studies are needed to ascertain whether rectal kFTR could represent a viable alternative to conventional surgical local excision techniques.

Abstract Image

后路深度浸润性直肠癌的刀辅助全层切除:一种新的内镜入路(附视频)
直肠癌的局部全层切除技术受到病变大小、位置或边缘描绘不清的限制。我们的目的是评估内镜刀辅助全层切除(kFTR)在口袋检测方法(PDM)指导下治疗深度浸润性直肠癌的可行性。回顾性分析2024年2月至10月在三级保健中心治疗的连续直肠后外侧病变,怀疑深粘膜下浸润。在PDM引导下的kFTR包括创建一个粘膜下袋来检测和隔离可疑的侵入性成分(肌肉收缩征),然后进行固有肌层切口和全层切除。技术上的成功,发现深部粘膜下浸润的准确性和整体切除率均为100%。中位手术时间为141.5 [IQR 123.7-179.5]分钟,中位住院时间为1 [IQR 1 - 7]天。无不良事件发生。组织病理学显示患者1 (pT2腺癌)呈r1垂直切缘,患者2、3和4 (pT1bsm3)在改进手术包括≥3mm固有肌层切缘后呈R0切缘。在患者1、2和4的第一次内镜随访中没有复发。患者3因多发高危组织学特征行手术前低位切除。先前的kFTR未影响手术(无残留直肠癌和1/17阳性淋巴结)。在PDM引导下的内镜下kFTR可能是一种可行的器官保留治疗方法,用于发现和切除深度侵袭性后直肠肿瘤。需要进一步的研究来确定直肠kFTR是否可以作为传统手术局部切除技术的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信