Key Landscape Factors Influencing Stream Physical Habitats Across the Brazilian Neotropical Savanna

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecohydrology Pub Date : 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1002/eco.70037
Heitor Carvalho Lacerda, Diego Rodrigues Macedo, Paulo Santos Pompeu, Luís Felipe Soares Cherem, Robert M. Hughes
{"title":"Key Landscape Factors Influencing Stream Physical Habitats Across the Brazilian Neotropical Savanna","authors":"Heitor Carvalho Lacerda,&nbsp;Diego Rodrigues Macedo,&nbsp;Paulo Santos Pompeu,&nbsp;Luís Felipe Soares Cherem,&nbsp;Robert M. Hughes","doi":"10.1002/eco.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Improved management of small headwater streams in the Cerrado (Neotropical Savanna) biome in Brazil is necessary given the significant landscape transformations caused by anthropogenic activities in recent decades. Thus, we aimed to determine the relative influence of the leading natural landscape features and anthropogenic pressures on the physical habitat structure of 174 headwater stream sites distributed in five hydrological units across the Cerrado. We used multivariate statistical analysis at four different spatial extents to establish likely causal relationships between landscape explanatory variables and 14 stream physical habitat response variables. At the biome extent, natural landscape variables explained only 13% of the variation in the physical habitats, but anthropogenic variables explained no variation. On the other hand, within the hydrological units, natural landscape variables explained 17–31% of physical habitat variation, and anthropogenic activities explained 0–27%. Regarding the influence of spatial extent, catchment variables were most important at the biome extent and within hydrologic units, but riparian and local variables were also significant within hydrologic units. Overall, terrain and drainage features likely drove differences in stream physical habitat in the biome and hydrologic units. Although vegetation cover and anthropogenic activities at the catchment, riparian zone, and site were usually of secondary importance, they occurred in all hydrologic unit models. For conserving and rehabilitating Cerrado headwater streams, it is essential to consider spatial connectivity and processes from catchment to local levels and large hydrologic units as largely independent systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eco.70037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improved management of small headwater streams in the Cerrado (Neotropical Savanna) biome in Brazil is necessary given the significant landscape transformations caused by anthropogenic activities in recent decades. Thus, we aimed to determine the relative influence of the leading natural landscape features and anthropogenic pressures on the physical habitat structure of 174 headwater stream sites distributed in five hydrological units across the Cerrado. We used multivariate statistical analysis at four different spatial extents to establish likely causal relationships between landscape explanatory variables and 14 stream physical habitat response variables. At the biome extent, natural landscape variables explained only 13% of the variation in the physical habitats, but anthropogenic variables explained no variation. On the other hand, within the hydrological units, natural landscape variables explained 17–31% of physical habitat variation, and anthropogenic activities explained 0–27%. Regarding the influence of spatial extent, catchment variables were most important at the biome extent and within hydrologic units, but riparian and local variables were also significant within hydrologic units. Overall, terrain and drainage features likely drove differences in stream physical habitat in the biome and hydrologic units. Although vegetation cover and anthropogenic activities at the catchment, riparian zone, and site were usually of secondary importance, they occurred in all hydrologic unit models. For conserving and rehabilitating Cerrado headwater streams, it is essential to consider spatial connectivity and processes from catchment to local levels and large hydrologic units as largely independent systems.

Abstract Image

影响巴西新热带稀树草原河流自然生境的主要景观因素
鉴于近几十年来人为活动造成的重大景观变化,有必要改善巴西塞拉多(新热带稀树草原)生物群落小源头溪流的管理。因此,我们的目的是确定主要自然景观特征和人为压力对塞拉多五个水文单元中174个源头的物理栖息地结构的相对影响。采用多元统计分析方法,在4个不同的空间范围内建立了景观解释变量与14个河流物理栖息地响应变量之间可能的因果关系。在生物群系程度上,自然景观变量仅解释了13%的自然生境变化,而人为变量对自然生境变化没有解释。另一方面,在水文单元内,自然景观变量解释了17-31%的自然生境变化,人为活动解释了0-27%。在空间范围上,流域变量在生物群系范围和水文单元内的影响最大,而河岸和局部变量在水文单元内的影响也很显著。总体而言,地形和排水特征可能导致了生物群落和水文单元中河流物理栖息地的差异。虽然集水区、河岸带和场址的植被覆盖和人为活动通常是次要的,但它们在所有水文单元模型中都存在。为了保护和恢复塞拉多的源头溪流,必须将空间连通性和从集水区到地方层面的过程以及大型水文单元视为基本独立的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecohydrology
Ecohydrology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
116
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management. Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信