Expert-Derived Flood Damage Curves for Critical Infrastructure Network Components

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
James H. Williams, Huong Ngan Vu, Ryan Paulik, Conrad Zorn, Liam Wotherspoon
{"title":"Expert-Derived Flood Damage Curves for Critical Infrastructure Network Components","authors":"James H. Williams,&nbsp;Huong Ngan Vu,&nbsp;Ryan Paulik,&nbsp;Conrad Zorn,&nbsp;Liam Wotherspoon","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flood impact assessment is limited by a scarcity of damage curves for critical infrastructure network components. This study presents a judgement-based methodology for developing critical infrastructure network component flood damage curves. The 12 semi-structured workshops record responses for estimated minimum and maximum damage ratios at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 m water depths. The 46 responses, weighted by participant expertise level, are aggregated into a discrete minimum and maximum damage curve for each component. Damage curves are presented for 34 infrastructure network components across the transportation, energy, water, and telecommunication sectors. These damage curves are benchmarked against relevant flood damage curves from previous studies, providing insight on how flood damage models compare internationally and across methods. While the synthesised flood damage curves allow for nationally consistent risk assessments, this study highlights the need for flood damage curves that represent local risk contexts for infrastructure network components to facilitate locally applicable risk assessments that inform risk management.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flood impact assessment is limited by a scarcity of damage curves for critical infrastructure network components. This study presents a judgement-based methodology for developing critical infrastructure network component flood damage curves. The 12 semi-structured workshops record responses for estimated minimum and maximum damage ratios at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 m water depths. The 46 responses, weighted by participant expertise level, are aggregated into a discrete minimum and maximum damage curve for each component. Damage curves are presented for 34 infrastructure network components across the transportation, energy, water, and telecommunication sectors. These damage curves are benchmarked against relevant flood damage curves from previous studies, providing insight on how flood damage models compare internationally and across methods. While the synthesised flood damage curves allow for nationally consistent risk assessments, this study highlights the need for flood damage curves that represent local risk contexts for infrastructure network components to facilitate locally applicable risk assessments that inform risk management.

Abstract Image

关键基础设施网络组件的专家推导洪水破坏曲线
洪水影响评估受限于关键基础设施网络部件的破坏曲线的缺乏。本文提出了一种基于判断的关键基础设施网络构件洪水灾害曲线绘制方法。12个半结构化的车间记录了在0.5、1、2和3米水深下估计的最小和最大损害比的反应。46个响应,按参与者的专业水平加权,汇总成每个组件的离散最小和最大损害曲线。本文给出了交通、能源、水和电信部门34个基础设施网络组件的损害曲线。这些损害曲线与先前研究的相关洪水损害曲线相比较,提供了洪水损害模型如何在国际上和不同方法之间进行比较的见解。虽然综合洪水损害曲线允许全国一致的风险评估,但本研究强调需要代表基础设施网络组成部分的当地风险背景的洪水损害曲线,以促进当地适用的风险评估,为风险管理提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信