Aboveground biomass relationship with canopy cover and vegetation to improve carbon change monitoring in rangelands

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70231
Chiara Pasut, Jacqueline R. England, Melissa Piper, Stephen H. Roxburgh, Keryn I. Paul
{"title":"Aboveground biomass relationship with canopy cover and vegetation to improve carbon change monitoring in rangelands","authors":"Chiara Pasut,&nbsp;Jacqueline R. England,&nbsp;Melissa Piper,&nbsp;Stephen H. Roxburgh,&nbsp;Keryn I. Paul","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rangelands cover vast areas of the global land surface and are important to the terrestrial carbon budget. However, carbon accounting in rangeland systems is often limited by the lack of transparent and systematic methods for assessing changes in aboveground biomass (<i>B</i><sub>AG</sub>). Although relationships between <i>B</i><sub>AG</sub> and canopy cover, <i>C</i>, have been investigated at site and regional scales, there are few studies across regions where the impact of a range of vegetation types and site conditions has been assessed. Here, results were compiled from extensive field measurements across 431 Australian rangeland sites (covering an area of ~6 million km<sup>2</sup>) to develop empirical relationships to predict <i>B</i><sub>AG</sub> from <i>C</i> and other structural variables. A boosted-regression-tree model was trained to identify the relative importance of predictor variables. Then, based on these results, a stepwise empirical log-linear relationship was developed to estimate <i>B</i><sub>AG</sub>. About 70% of the <i>B</i><sub>AG</sub> could be described using <i>C</i>, the percentage of large trees (stem diameter &gt;50 cm), and height. Because such detailed information is not yet available at sufficient spatial and temporal resolution, classifications based on existing maps of structural vegetation classes, using <i>C</i> as the single predictor variable, were explored as an alternative approach to estimate <i>B</i><sub>AG</sub>. For most structural vegetation classes assessed, estimates of <i>B</i><sub>AG</sub> from <i>C</i> were statistically significant, with Lin's concordance coefficients of 0.67–0.79 and proportional error of &lt;36% relative to the <i>B</i><sub>AG</sub> across all the classes. There was generally little improvement in model performance with the inclusion of additional explanatory variables. Overall, this study has improved our understanding of relationships between <i>C</i> and <i>B</i><sub>AG</sub> across rangeland systems. Additionally, combining remotely sensed woody cover data with these relationships may offer a transparent and accurate approach to monitor changes in biomass carbon stocks in these ecosystems at a large spatial scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70231","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rangelands cover vast areas of the global land surface and are important to the terrestrial carbon budget. However, carbon accounting in rangeland systems is often limited by the lack of transparent and systematic methods for assessing changes in aboveground biomass (BAG). Although relationships between BAG and canopy cover, C, have been investigated at site and regional scales, there are few studies across regions where the impact of a range of vegetation types and site conditions has been assessed. Here, results were compiled from extensive field measurements across 431 Australian rangeland sites (covering an area of ~6 million km2) to develop empirical relationships to predict BAG from C and other structural variables. A boosted-regression-tree model was trained to identify the relative importance of predictor variables. Then, based on these results, a stepwise empirical log-linear relationship was developed to estimate BAG. About 70% of the BAG could be described using C, the percentage of large trees (stem diameter >50 cm), and height. Because such detailed information is not yet available at sufficient spatial and temporal resolution, classifications based on existing maps of structural vegetation classes, using C as the single predictor variable, were explored as an alternative approach to estimate BAG. For most structural vegetation classes assessed, estimates of BAG from C were statistically significant, with Lin's concordance coefficients of 0.67–0.79 and proportional error of <36% relative to the BAG across all the classes. There was generally little improvement in model performance with the inclusion of additional explanatory variables. Overall, this study has improved our understanding of relationships between C and BAG across rangeland systems. Additionally, combining remotely sensed woody cover data with these relationships may offer a transparent and accurate approach to monitor changes in biomass carbon stocks in these ecosystems at a large spatial scale.

Abstract Image

利用地上生物量与冠层和植被的关系改善草地碳变化监测
牧场覆盖了全球陆地表面的大片区域,对陆地碳收支至关重要。然而,牧场系统中的碳核算常常受到缺乏透明和系统的方法来评估地上生物量变化的限制。虽然已经在立地和区域尺度上研究了BAG与冠层盖度C之间的关系,但很少有跨区域的研究评估了一系列植被类型和立地条件的影响。在这里,研究人员对澳大利亚431个牧场(面积约600万平方公里)进行了广泛的野外测量,以建立经验关系,从C和其他结构变量预测BAG。训练了一个增强回归树模型来识别预测变量的相对重要性。然后,基于这些结果,建立了逐步经验对数线性关系来估计BAG。约70%的BAG可以用C、大树百分比(茎粗50 cm)和高度来描述。由于这些详细的信息还没有足够的时空分辨率,基于现有的结构植被分类图,以C作为单一的预测变量,探索了作为估计BAG的替代方法。对于大多数被评估的结构植被类别,C估算的BAG具有统计学意义,Lin的一致性系数为0.67-0.79,相对于所有类别的BAG的比例误差为<;36%。一般来说,加入额外的解释变量后,模型的性能几乎没有改善。总的来说,这项研究提高了我们对牧场系统中C和BAG之间关系的理解。此外,将遥感木材覆盖数据与这些关系结合起来,可以在大空间尺度上提供透明和准确的监测这些生态系统生物量碳储量变化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信