Classification of wood species in trade using metabolomic profiling by GC×GC-TOFMS

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Ryan Dias, Seo Lin Nam, A. Paulina de la Mata, Martin Williams, Isabelle Duchesne, Manuel Lamothe, Nathalie Isabel, James J. Harynuk
{"title":"Classification of wood species in trade using metabolomic profiling by GC×GC-TOFMS","authors":"Ryan Dias,&nbsp;Seo Lin Nam,&nbsp;A. Paulina de la Mata,&nbsp;Martin Williams,&nbsp;Isabelle Duchesne,&nbsp;Manuel Lamothe,&nbsp;Nathalie Isabel,&nbsp;James J. Harynuk","doi":"10.1007/s00226-025-01657-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>\n Reports of illegal logging are increasing globally, driving a need for tools that can effectively identify wood products at the species level. This identification is crucial for regulatory purposes, certifying legal lumber, preventing environmental crimes, and protecting ecosystems and society. Current wood identification methods are primarily based on anatomical observation of wood tissues, chemical profiling using direct analysis in real-time time-of-flight mass spectrometry (DART-TOFMS), and DNA-based analyses. While these approaches have their advantages, they also present challenges, particularly when species-level identification is required for enforcement. As an alternative, metabolite profiling using separation techniques coupled with mass spectrometry shows potential as a robust species-level wood identification method. Here, we present a method for classifying wood at the species level through chemical profiling of the wood metabolome using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS) combined with chemometric analysis. In this study, different tissues, including sapwood, heartwood, and branches from seven wood species collected from genetically characterized trees representing three distinct genera (<i>Quercus</i>, <i>Acer</i>, <i>Picea</i>) were investigated. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to visualize differences between species and tissue types, while partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and feature selection were used to construct classification models for species-level wood identification. The classification models were built using data from wood cores, branches, or a mixture of wood cores and branch samples. Each classification model was tested with an external validation set, and the performance of the classification model was evaluated based on the prediction of the external validation data. Our results show that classification modelling using wood metabolomic data is promising, especially with the same tissue type, presenting accuracies of 100%, 100%, and 93.2% in the prediction of wood core samples at the species level for <i>Quercus</i>, <i>Acer</i>, and <i>Picea</i>, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":810,"journal":{"name":"Wood Science and Technology","volume":"59 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wood Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00226-025-01657-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reports of illegal logging are increasing globally, driving a need for tools that can effectively identify wood products at the species level. This identification is crucial for regulatory purposes, certifying legal lumber, preventing environmental crimes, and protecting ecosystems and society. Current wood identification methods are primarily based on anatomical observation of wood tissues, chemical profiling using direct analysis in real-time time-of-flight mass spectrometry (DART-TOFMS), and DNA-based analyses. While these approaches have their advantages, they also present challenges, particularly when species-level identification is required for enforcement. As an alternative, metabolite profiling using separation techniques coupled with mass spectrometry shows potential as a robust species-level wood identification method. Here, we present a method for classifying wood at the species level through chemical profiling of the wood metabolome using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS) combined with chemometric analysis. In this study, different tissues, including sapwood, heartwood, and branches from seven wood species collected from genetically characterized trees representing three distinct genera (Quercus, Acer, Picea) were investigated. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to visualize differences between species and tissue types, while partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and feature selection were used to construct classification models for species-level wood identification. The classification models were built using data from wood cores, branches, or a mixture of wood cores and branch samples. Each classification model was tested with an external validation set, and the performance of the classification model was evaluated based on the prediction of the external validation data. Our results show that classification modelling using wood metabolomic data is promising, especially with the same tissue type, presenting accuracies of 100%, 100%, and 93.2% in the prediction of wood core samples at the species level for Quercus, Acer, and Picea, respectively.

利用GC×GC-TOFMS的代谢组学分析对贸易中木材种类进行分类
全球范围内关于非法采伐的报道越来越多,这推动了对能够在物种层面上有效识别木材产品的工具的需求。这种识别对于监管目的、证明合法木材、防止环境犯罪以及保护生态系统和社会至关重要。目前的木材鉴定方法主要基于木材组织的解剖观察,利用实时飞行时间质谱(DART-TOFMS)直接分析的化学分析,以及基于dna的分析。虽然这些方法有其优点,但也带来了挑战,特别是在执法需要进行物种一级的鉴定时。作为一种替代方法,利用分离技术结合质谱分析代谢物谱显示出作为一种强大的物种水平木材鉴定方法的潜力。在这里,我们提出了一种方法,通过综合二维气相色谱法结合飞行时间质谱法(GC×GC-TOFMS)结合化学计量分析,对木材代谢组进行化学分析,在物种水平上对木材进行分类。本研究采集了栎属、槭属、云杉属3种具有遗传特征的树种的7种木材的不同组织,包括边材、心材和树枝。利用主成分分析(PCA)可视化树种和组织类型之间的差异,利用偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)和特征选择构建树种水平木材鉴定的分类模型。分类模型是使用来自木芯、树枝或木芯和树枝混合样本的数据建立的。使用外部验证集对每个分类模型进行测试,并根据外部验证数据的预测结果对分类模型的性能进行评价。研究结果表明,利用木材代谢组学数据进行分类建模是有希望的,特别是在相同组织类型的情况下,在树种水平上对栎、槭和云杉的木芯样品的预测准确率分别为100%、100%和93.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wood Science and Technology
Wood Science and Technology 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Wood Science and Technology publishes original scientific research results and review papers covering the entire field of wood material science, wood components and wood based products. Subjects are wood biology and wood quality, wood physics and physical technologies, wood chemistry and chemical technologies. Latest advances in areas such as cell wall and wood formation; structural and chemical composition of wood and wood composites and their property relations; physical, mechanical and chemical characterization and relevant methodological developments, and microbiological degradation of wood and wood based products are reported. Topics related to wood technology include machining, gluing, and finishing, composite technology, wood modification, wood mechanics, creep and rheology, and the conversion of wood into pulp and biorefinery products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信