Mojtaba Moosapoor, Bjarni Bessason, Birgir Hrafnkelsson, Rajesh Rupakhety, Atefe Darzi, Jón Örvar Bjarnason, Sigurður Erlingsson
{"title":"Seismic vulnerability model development based on Bayesian parameter estimation: Application to the South Iceland loss data","authors":"Mojtaba Moosapoor, Bjarni Bessason, Birgir Hrafnkelsson, Rajesh Rupakhety, Atefe Darzi, Jón Örvar Bjarnason, Sigurður Erlingsson","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02145-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assessment of the seismic fragility and vulnerability of buildings is crucial in the evaluation of seismic risk. Our study employs a vulnerability model that is specifically developed and calibrated for the target building portfolio, providing a comprehensive and accurate representation of underlying behavior and characteristics of the buildings. This article presents the first application of a Bayesian Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to quantify the seismic vulnerability of buildings using zero-inflated beta regression (ZIBR) models. Losses inflicted by the South Iceland earthquakes of June 2000 and May 2008 to low-rise residential buildings, registered in two independent building-by-building datasets, are investigated. Effects of different factors such as construction material, building height, and the status of seismic design code at the time of construction in overall performance of the buildings affected are explored and discussed. Although ZIBR models have previously been calibrated for these two datasets, the MCMC method applied in this work presents an added value in improving error estimates and determining posterior distributions of the model parameters and the predicted seismic vulnerability. The calibrated models provide distributions of damage factors of the affected buildings as functions of ground shaking intensity measures (IMs), which in this study are taken as the peak ground acceleration (PGA), as in previous studies; in addition, the average spectral acceleration (AvgSa) is also tested as an IM for the loss data. The comparison of the two datasets revealed substantial differences in the mean losses between 2000 and 2008 earthquakes. The average losses from the 2000 dataset were found to be approximately double those from the 2008 dataset for a given IM. The results also revealed that the seismic performance of the building stock was improved with the introduction of stronger seismic codes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 6","pages":"2765 - 2803"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02145-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Assessment of the seismic fragility and vulnerability of buildings is crucial in the evaluation of seismic risk. Our study employs a vulnerability model that is specifically developed and calibrated for the target building portfolio, providing a comprehensive and accurate representation of underlying behavior and characteristics of the buildings. This article presents the first application of a Bayesian Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to quantify the seismic vulnerability of buildings using zero-inflated beta regression (ZIBR) models. Losses inflicted by the South Iceland earthquakes of June 2000 and May 2008 to low-rise residential buildings, registered in two independent building-by-building datasets, are investigated. Effects of different factors such as construction material, building height, and the status of seismic design code at the time of construction in overall performance of the buildings affected are explored and discussed. Although ZIBR models have previously been calibrated for these two datasets, the MCMC method applied in this work presents an added value in improving error estimates and determining posterior distributions of the model parameters and the predicted seismic vulnerability. The calibrated models provide distributions of damage factors of the affected buildings as functions of ground shaking intensity measures (IMs), which in this study are taken as the peak ground acceleration (PGA), as in previous studies; in addition, the average spectral acceleration (AvgSa) is also tested as an IM for the loss data. The comparison of the two datasets revealed substantial differences in the mean losses between 2000 and 2008 earthquakes. The average losses from the 2000 dataset were found to be approximately double those from the 2008 dataset for a given IM. The results also revealed that the seismic performance of the building stock was improved with the introduction of stronger seismic codes.
期刊介绍:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings.
Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more.
This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.