Experimental study and numerical simulation of seismic performance of precast segmental bridge piers with tapered sleeve locking-type splicing joints

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Jian Wang, Yongyu Yuan
{"title":"Experimental study and numerical simulation of seismic performance of precast segmental bridge piers with tapered sleeve locking-type splicing joints","authors":"Jian Wang,&nbsp;Yongyu Yuan","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02150-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The tapered sleeve locking-type splicing (TSLS) joint, as a new type of mechanical connection of steel bars, provides a new method for the connection of longitudinal steel bars in precast segmental bridge (PSB) piers. In this paper, the methods of quasi-static test and numerical simulation were adopted to study the seismic performance of PSB piers with TSLS joints (PPTJ). The results showed that the failure processes of PPTJ and cast-in-place piers (CIPP) were basically identical under quasi-static cyclic loading, and the failure modes were both flexural failure. When the reinforcement ratio was identical, the energy dissipation capacity and self-resetting performance of PPTJ and CIPP were comparable, and the horizontal bearing capacity and stiffness of PPTJ were improved compared to those of CIPP. When the volumetric stirrup ratio at the bottom of pier body was doubled, the horizontal bearing capacity, stiffness and energy dissipation capacity of PPTJ were improved slightly, and the self-resetting performance was increased by 8.4% when PPTJ was failure. When the longitudinal reinforcement ratio was doubled, the horizontal bearing capacity, stiffness, energy dissipation capacity and self-resetting performance of PPTJ were obviously improved. The self-resetting performance of PPTJ was slightly higher than that of the PSB piers with grouted sleeve joints, and the other seismic performance indexes of the two kinds of piers were comparable. The research results can provide reference for the seismic design and engineering application of PPTJ.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 6","pages":"2669 - 2692"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02150-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The tapered sleeve locking-type splicing (TSLS) joint, as a new type of mechanical connection of steel bars, provides a new method for the connection of longitudinal steel bars in precast segmental bridge (PSB) piers. In this paper, the methods of quasi-static test and numerical simulation were adopted to study the seismic performance of PSB piers with TSLS joints (PPTJ). The results showed that the failure processes of PPTJ and cast-in-place piers (CIPP) were basically identical under quasi-static cyclic loading, and the failure modes were both flexural failure. When the reinforcement ratio was identical, the energy dissipation capacity and self-resetting performance of PPTJ and CIPP were comparable, and the horizontal bearing capacity and stiffness of PPTJ were improved compared to those of CIPP. When the volumetric stirrup ratio at the bottom of pier body was doubled, the horizontal bearing capacity, stiffness and energy dissipation capacity of PPTJ were improved slightly, and the self-resetting performance was increased by 8.4% when PPTJ was failure. When the longitudinal reinforcement ratio was doubled, the horizontal bearing capacity, stiffness, energy dissipation capacity and self-resetting performance of PPTJ were obviously improved. The self-resetting performance of PPTJ was slightly higher than that of the PSB piers with grouted sleeve joints, and the other seismic performance indexes of the two kinds of piers were comparable. The research results can provide reference for the seismic design and engineering application of PPTJ.

采用锥形套筒锁定式拼接接头的预制节段式桥墩抗震性能的实验研究与数值模拟
锥形套筒锁紧式拼接(TSLS)接头作为一种新型的钢筋机械连接方式,为预制节段桥桥墩中纵向钢筋的连接提供了一种新的方法。本文采用准静力试验和数值模拟的方法研究了带TSLS节点的PSB桥墩(PPTJ)的抗震性能。结果表明:在准静态循环荷载作用下,PPTJ墩与现浇墩的破坏过程基本相同,破坏模式均为受弯破坏;在配筋率相同的情况下,PPTJ和CIPP的耗能能力和自复位性能相当,且PPTJ的水平承载力和刚度较CIPP有所提高。当墩体底部体积配箍比增加一倍时,PPTJ的水平承载力、刚度和消能能力略有提高,破坏时PPTJ的自复位性能提高了8.4%。当纵向配筋率增加一倍时,PPTJ的水平承载力、刚度、耗能能力和自复位性能均有明显提高。PPTJ的自复位性能略高于灌浆套筒缝的PSB桥墩,两种桥墩的其他抗震性能指标相当。研究结果可为PPTJ的抗震设计和工程应用提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信