{"title":"Beyond stereotypes: Cognitive abilities underlying social meaning","authors":"Inbal Kuperwasser , Einat Shetreet","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>‘Social meaning’ refers to a relation between social identity and linguistic features, and often concerns stereotypical knowledge. In this study, we propose this relation can also be mediated by cognitive abilities, as these are affected by social context and are required in meaning processing. As a case-study, we tested the negative effects of social outgroup (through political affiliation) and Theory of Mind skills (ToM) on the processing of a highly-regularized pragmatic phenomenon (scalar implicatures) in Hebrew and English speakers. First, we replicated previous findings showing a decrease in the rates of pragmatic responses for an outgroup speaker compared to a control speaker with no group affiliation. More importantly, we showed that this effect is associated with ToM abilities, such that individuals with lower baseline ToM abilities in the outgroup condition were less likely to give pragmatic responses than individuals with similar ToM abilities in the control condition. This suggests a role for ToM in mediating the negative effect in the outgroup condition, therefore supporting the expansion of social meaning to more general, non-stereotype-specific, cases where social characteristics affect pragmatic interpretation, through the mediation of social cognition abilities. Our results highlight that social meaning is ingrained in pragmatic processing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"242 ","pages":"Pages 1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000827","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
‘Social meaning’ refers to a relation between social identity and linguistic features, and often concerns stereotypical knowledge. In this study, we propose this relation can also be mediated by cognitive abilities, as these are affected by social context and are required in meaning processing. As a case-study, we tested the negative effects of social outgroup (through political affiliation) and Theory of Mind skills (ToM) on the processing of a highly-regularized pragmatic phenomenon (scalar implicatures) in Hebrew and English speakers. First, we replicated previous findings showing a decrease in the rates of pragmatic responses for an outgroup speaker compared to a control speaker with no group affiliation. More importantly, we showed that this effect is associated with ToM abilities, such that individuals with lower baseline ToM abilities in the outgroup condition were less likely to give pragmatic responses than individuals with similar ToM abilities in the control condition. This suggests a role for ToM in mediating the negative effect in the outgroup condition, therefore supporting the expansion of social meaning to more general, non-stereotype-specific, cases where social characteristics affect pragmatic interpretation, through the mediation of social cognition abilities. Our results highlight that social meaning is ingrained in pragmatic processing.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.