Xin Qi , Xiyao Liu , Xiaoyan Zhang , Yuhuan Xia , Shasha Liu , Hui Lin , Ziyao Wang
{"title":"One requirement, multiple insights: The impact of innovation job requirement on employee radical and incremental creativity","authors":"Xin Qi , Xiyao Liu , Xiaoyan Zhang , Yuhuan Xia , Shasha Liu , Hui Lin , Ziyao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Organizations are increasingly incorporating innovation into job requirements to encourage employees to generate and implement novel ideas (i.e., enhance employees’ creativity). Despite extensive research on the impact of innovation job requirements on creativity, the findings remain inconsistent, being either positive or negative. To address this issue, drawing on the regulatory focus theory, we focused on employees’ different types of creativity and explored how innovation job requirements impact employees’ radical versus incremental creativity. Through a questionnaire survey of 485 employees and 124 direct supervisors from two high-tech firms and one manufacturing firm in China, the empirical results indicated that innovation job requirements promoted expected image gains for promotion-focused employees, whereas for prevention-focused employees, innovation job requirements fostered incremental creativity by heightening expected image risks. These findings contribute valuable insights to research on innovation job requirements and creativity and provide practical guidance for organizations to foster employees’ different types of creativity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 115395"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325002188","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Organizations are increasingly incorporating innovation into job requirements to encourage employees to generate and implement novel ideas (i.e., enhance employees’ creativity). Despite extensive research on the impact of innovation job requirements on creativity, the findings remain inconsistent, being either positive or negative. To address this issue, drawing on the regulatory focus theory, we focused on employees’ different types of creativity and explored how innovation job requirements impact employees’ radical versus incremental creativity. Through a questionnaire survey of 485 employees and 124 direct supervisors from two high-tech firms and one manufacturing firm in China, the empirical results indicated that innovation job requirements promoted expected image gains for promotion-focused employees, whereas for prevention-focused employees, innovation job requirements fostered incremental creativity by heightening expected image risks. These findings contribute valuable insights to research on innovation job requirements and creativity and provide practical guidance for organizations to foster employees’ different types of creativity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.