Clinical impact of occlusion location in the middle cerebral artery during endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke with underlying intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Joong-Goo Kim , Chul-Hoo Kang , Hong Jun Kim , Jong Kook Rhim , Jay Chol Choi , Doo Hyuk Kwon
{"title":"Clinical impact of occlusion location in the middle cerebral artery during endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke with underlying intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis","authors":"Joong-Goo Kim ,&nbsp;Chul-Hoo Kang ,&nbsp;Hong Jun Kim ,&nbsp;Jong Kook Rhim ,&nbsp;Jay Chol Choi ,&nbsp;Doo Hyuk Kwon","doi":"10.1016/j.neurad.2025.101340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><div>This study examines the clinical outcomes of endovascular reperfusion therapy and emergent intracranial stenting based on the angiographically defined occlusion location of the middle cerebral artery (MCA).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We reviewed consecutive patients with acute MCA infarct associated with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) who underwent rescue intracranial stenting and balloon angioplasty after initial mechanical thrombectomy. We compared patient demographics, baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and periprocedural complications, including in-stent thrombosis and re-occlusion, according to the MCA occlusion location. The occlusion location was categorized based on the presence of the proximal MCA stump in enrolled ICAS patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 47 patients, 30 (63.8 %) were classified as having a stump group. The initial NIHSS was more severe in the without-stump group compared to the with-stump group (13.0 [8.0–16.0] vs. 8.0 [8.0–13.0] <em>p</em> = 0.078). There were no significant differences in procedure time, technique, and devices. However, the successful revascularization rate was significantly lower in the without-stump group (64.7 % vs. 100 %, <em>p</em> = 0.002). Additionally, the immediate re-occlusion rate after the first endovascular reperfusion therapy tended to be higher in the without-stump group (76.5 % vs. 36.7 %, <em>p</em> = 0.02). No significant association was found between periprocedural complications, including intracerebral hemorrhage and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Angiographically presented MCA occlusion without a stump in acute large vessel occlusion underlying ICAS predicts more complicated intracranial stenting and poorer clinical outcomes than patients with a stump.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":"52 4","pages":"Article 101340"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986125000987","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose

This study examines the clinical outcomes of endovascular reperfusion therapy and emergent intracranial stenting based on the angiographically defined occlusion location of the middle cerebral artery (MCA).

Materials and Methods

We reviewed consecutive patients with acute MCA infarct associated with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) who underwent rescue intracranial stenting and balloon angioplasty after initial mechanical thrombectomy. We compared patient demographics, baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and periprocedural complications, including in-stent thrombosis and re-occlusion, according to the MCA occlusion location. The occlusion location was categorized based on the presence of the proximal MCA stump in enrolled ICAS patients.

Results

Of 47 patients, 30 (63.8 %) were classified as having a stump group. The initial NIHSS was more severe in the without-stump group compared to the with-stump group (13.0 [8.0–16.0] vs. 8.0 [8.0–13.0] p = 0.078). There were no significant differences in procedure time, technique, and devices. However, the successful revascularization rate was significantly lower in the without-stump group (64.7 % vs. 100 %, p = 0.002). Additionally, the immediate re-occlusion rate after the first endovascular reperfusion therapy tended to be higher in the without-stump group (76.5 % vs. 36.7 %, p = 0.02). No significant association was found between periprocedural complications, including intracerebral hemorrhage and mortality.

Conclusions

Angiographically presented MCA occlusion without a stump in acute large vessel occlusion underlying ICAS predicts more complicated intracranial stenting and poorer clinical outcomes than patients with a stump.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroradiology
Journal of Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroradiology is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing worldwide clinical and basic research in the field of diagnostic and Interventional neuroradiology, translational and molecular neuroimaging, and artificial intelligence in neuroradiology. The Journal of Neuroradiology considers for publication articles, reviews, technical notes and letters to the editors (correspondence section), provided that the methodology and scientific content are of high quality, and that the results will have substantial clinical impact and/or physiological importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信