{"title":"Cartographic Reproductions: The Franciscan Legacy in Amazonian Peru, 1830–1847","authors":"Roberto Chauca","doi":"10.1016/j.jhg.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scholars have not paid sufficient attention to the role that cartographic reproduction played in shaping and disseminating geographic knowledge about Amazonia in early postcolonial Peru. By the early nineteenth century, when Peru gained its independence from Spain, cartographic knowledge of its eastern Amazonian frontier was limited to maps produced mostly by Franciscan missionaries who had overseen the evangelization of the region since the previous century. Thus, the reproduction of missionary charts became an important procedure that the Peruvian administration undertook to delineate and incorporate Amazonia into the newly independent nation. But it was not a simple process of copying, nor was it associated with advances in technical and printing accuracy, the reduction of map production costs, and the emergence of copyright regulations, as has been commonly argued in studies of modern cartographic copying. In contrast, this article explores a still unregulated context involving amateur cartographers who produced primarily handwritten maps. More significantly, I highlight the new meanings that colonial missionary maps acquired after being reproduced within postcolonial bureaucratic circles through the deployment of three strategies of cartographic reproduction — celebratory, tactical-military, and administrative — that transformed the original evangelizing intentions that the Franciscans had when mapping Amazonia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Geography","volume":"89 ","pages":"Pages 89-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Geography","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305748825000131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Scholars have not paid sufficient attention to the role that cartographic reproduction played in shaping and disseminating geographic knowledge about Amazonia in early postcolonial Peru. By the early nineteenth century, when Peru gained its independence from Spain, cartographic knowledge of its eastern Amazonian frontier was limited to maps produced mostly by Franciscan missionaries who had overseen the evangelization of the region since the previous century. Thus, the reproduction of missionary charts became an important procedure that the Peruvian administration undertook to delineate and incorporate Amazonia into the newly independent nation. But it was not a simple process of copying, nor was it associated with advances in technical and printing accuracy, the reduction of map production costs, and the emergence of copyright regulations, as has been commonly argued in studies of modern cartographic copying. In contrast, this article explores a still unregulated context involving amateur cartographers who produced primarily handwritten maps. More significantly, I highlight the new meanings that colonial missionary maps acquired after being reproduced within postcolonial bureaucratic circles through the deployment of three strategies of cartographic reproduction — celebratory, tactical-military, and administrative — that transformed the original evangelizing intentions that the Franciscans had when mapping Amazonia.
期刊介绍:
A well-established international quarterly, the Journal of Historical Geography publishes articles on all aspects of historical geography and cognate fields, including environmental history. As well as publishing original research papers of interest to a wide international and interdisciplinary readership, the journal encourages lively discussion of methodological and conceptual issues and debates over new challenges facing researchers in the field. Each issue includes a substantial book review section.