Are we gatekeeping trauma? A conceptual model to expand criterion A for invisible, identity-based, and systemic traumas

Abstract

Since the inception of the criterion A framework into the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis in DSM-III, what qualifies as traumatic has been a fieldwide debate. Historically, social movements coinciding with advances in research have spurred improvements in the definition of criterion A, often by expanding the breadth of experiences that are considered trauma exposure. Contemporary issues of ongoing racial discrimination, ethno-violence, public health pandemics, warfare, oppression, and climate change warrant a re-examination of the criterion A definition. This critical review builds on prior critiques of criterion A and addresses (1) the limitations to the current criterion A definition in DSM-5 in capturing the experience of minoritized individuals; (2) three categories of trauma that are under-recognized in the current criterion A definition; and (3) the implications of expanding criterion A on clinical and research practice. We critically review three trauma categories that disproportionately affect minoritized individuals—invisible traumas, identity-based traumas, and systemic traumas. Evidence to date suggests that several traumatic experiences in these categories rise to the level of being traumatic, are associated with PTSD symptoms, and are prevalent among minoritized individuals. We discuss the implications of these traumas being omitted from criterion A and call for future work to critically examine the definition of criterion A in the PTSD diagnostic framework. Overall, this critical review captures traumas which remain undertreated, underdiagnosed, and under-represented by our current psychiatric nosology.