Integration of geothermal power plant, water treatment plant, AWE, and PEM electrolyzer for green hydrogen production: A techno-economic study

Muhammad Alwi Husaini , Prihadi Setyo Darmanto , Firman Bagja Juangsa
{"title":"Integration of geothermal power plant, water treatment plant, AWE, and PEM electrolyzer for green hydrogen production: A techno-economic study","authors":"Muhammad Alwi Husaini ,&nbsp;Prihadi Setyo Darmanto ,&nbsp;Firman Bagja Juangsa","doi":"10.1016/j.nxener.2025.100288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green hydrogen production plays a crucial role in the global shift toward sustainable energy, offering a clean alternative to fossil fuels. However, large-scale adoption is often limited by high production costs and the intermittent availability of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind. Geothermal energy offers a promising solution by providing a stable and continuous power supply for water electrolysis. This study explores the integration of geothermal power with water treatment and electrolysis systems for green hydrogen production. Cooling tower basin water from a geothermal power plant is treated using an ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis-ion exchange mixed bed system to meet the purity requirements for electrolysis. The treated water achieves a conductivity of 1–2 μS/cm for alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) and 0.05–0.08 μS/cm for proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis. A 10 MW AWE and PEM electrolyzer are modeled to produce 181.03 kg/h and 191.26 kg/h of hydrogen, respectively. The levelized cost of hydrogen is estimated at 6.52 $/kg for AWE and 6.67 $/kg for PEM, with electricity costs contributing over 64% of the total. AWE electrolysis at 10 MW requires 1616 kg/h of feed water, while PEM electrolysis requires 1709 kg/h, both supplied by the water treatment plant. Despite higher capital costs and shorter lifespans of PEM electrolyzers, water treatment costs remain minimal at 0.17% of total production costs. The findings demonstrate geothermal energy as a viable alternative to intermittent renewables for continuous hydrogen production. This study offers a techno-economic evaluation of geothermal-based hydrogen production, supporting its role in the global energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100957,"journal":{"name":"Next Energy","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949821X25000511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green hydrogen production plays a crucial role in the global shift toward sustainable energy, offering a clean alternative to fossil fuels. However, large-scale adoption is often limited by high production costs and the intermittent availability of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind. Geothermal energy offers a promising solution by providing a stable and continuous power supply for water electrolysis. This study explores the integration of geothermal power with water treatment and electrolysis systems for green hydrogen production. Cooling tower basin water from a geothermal power plant is treated using an ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis-ion exchange mixed bed system to meet the purity requirements for electrolysis. The treated water achieves a conductivity of 1–2 μS/cm for alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) and 0.05–0.08 μS/cm for proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis. A 10 MW AWE and PEM electrolyzer are modeled to produce 181.03 kg/h and 191.26 kg/h of hydrogen, respectively. The levelized cost of hydrogen is estimated at 6.52 $/kg for AWE and 6.67 $/kg for PEM, with electricity costs contributing over 64% of the total. AWE electrolysis at 10 MW requires 1616 kg/h of feed water, while PEM electrolysis requires 1709 kg/h, both supplied by the water treatment plant. Despite higher capital costs and shorter lifespans of PEM electrolyzers, water treatment costs remain minimal at 0.17% of total production costs. The findings demonstrate geothermal energy as a viable alternative to intermittent renewables for continuous hydrogen production. This study offers a techno-economic evaluation of geothermal-based hydrogen production, supporting its role in the global energy transition.
整合地热发电厂、水处理厂、AWE 和 PEM 电解槽,实现绿色制氢:技术经济研究
绿色氢气生产在全球向可持续能源的转变中发挥着至关重要的作用,为化石燃料提供了一种清洁的替代品。然而,大规模采用往往受到生产成本高和太阳能和风能等可再生能源的间歇性供应的限制。地热能为水电解提供稳定、连续的电力供应,是一种很有前途的解决方案。本研究探讨地热发电与水处理和电解系统的整合,以实现绿色制氢。采用超滤-反渗透交换混合床系统对某地热发电厂冷却塔盆水进行处理,以满足电解的纯度要求。碱性电解水的电导率为1 ~ 2 μS/cm,质子交换膜电解水的电导率为0.05 ~ 0.08 μS/cm。一个10 MW的AWE和PEM电解槽分别产生181.03 kg/h和191.26 kg/h的氢气。据估计,AWE和PEM的氢气平化成本分别为6.52 美元/千克和6.67 美元/千克,其中电力成本占总成本的64%以上。10 MW的AWE电解需要1616 kg/h的给水,PEM电解需要1709 kg/h的给水,均由水处理厂提供。尽管PEM电解槽的资本成本较高,寿命较短,但水处理成本仍然很低,仅占总生产成本的0.17%。研究结果表明,地热能是间歇性可再生能源连续制氢的可行替代方案。这项研究提供了地热制氢的技术经济评估,支持其在全球能源转型中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信