Press releases of industry-sponsored clinical trials in oncology: Characteristics, timing and financial impact

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Anna Amela Valsecchi , Cecilia Conte , Nicola Maria Fiore , Maria Lucia Iacovino , Daniele Ierace , Letizia Galeasso , Eleonora Paganoni , Oriana Ciani , Francesco Perrone , Massimo Di Maio
{"title":"Press releases of industry-sponsored clinical trials in oncology: Characteristics, timing and financial impact","authors":"Anna Amela Valsecchi ,&nbsp;Cecilia Conte ,&nbsp;Nicola Maria Fiore ,&nbsp;Maria Lucia Iacovino ,&nbsp;Daniele Ierace ,&nbsp;Letizia Galeasso ,&nbsp;Eleonora Paganoni ,&nbsp;Oriana Ciani ,&nbsp;Francesco Perrone ,&nbsp;Massimo Di Maio","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Press releases (PRs) anticipate the results of a clinical trial, possibly without providing detailed data. The purpose of this analysis was to describe the characteristics of PRs in oncology, delays in the availability of results and the impact on the financial market.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>PRs published between 2018 and 2022 about solid tumors, archived on the websites of the top 20 oncology pharmaceutical companies, were screened. Information about PR content, time between PRs and scientific meeting, paper publication and approval by regulatory agencies were collected. Market reactions on the event days of the PRs were examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 159 PRs, 157 were eligible. The most represented tumor was lung cancer (28 %). In most cases (117, 74.5 %), PRs announced that the study met its primary endpoint. Among these, 13 % of PRs included specific results, while the remaining 102 (87 %) contained only generic sentences. 85 % of PRs contained sentences supporting the clinical relevance of the results. Median time from PR to meeting presentation and full paper publication was 3.1 and 8 months, respectively. After a median follow-up of 48 months, 79 % were approved by FDA and 74 % by EMA. Median time from PR to approval by FDA and EMA was 10 and 15.9 months, respectively. Most events analyzed showed no statistically significant market reactions, with abnormal returns generally neutral or slightly positive.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most PRs announce firstly the positivity of a clinical trial, without detailed results. The market appears to absorb this information with minimal stock price adjustments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538325000311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Press releases (PRs) anticipate the results of a clinical trial, possibly without providing detailed data. The purpose of this analysis was to describe the characteristics of PRs in oncology, delays in the availability of results and the impact on the financial market.

Materials and methods

PRs published between 2018 and 2022 about solid tumors, archived on the websites of the top 20 oncology pharmaceutical companies, were screened. Information about PR content, time between PRs and scientific meeting, paper publication and approval by regulatory agencies were collected. Market reactions on the event days of the PRs were examined.

Results

Out of 159 PRs, 157 were eligible. The most represented tumor was lung cancer (28 %). In most cases (117, 74.5 %), PRs announced that the study met its primary endpoint. Among these, 13 % of PRs included specific results, while the remaining 102 (87 %) contained only generic sentences. 85 % of PRs contained sentences supporting the clinical relevance of the results. Median time from PR to meeting presentation and full paper publication was 3.1 and 8 months, respectively. After a median follow-up of 48 months, 79 % were approved by FDA and 74 % by EMA. Median time from PR to approval by FDA and EMA was 10 and 15.9 months, respectively. Most events analyzed showed no statistically significant market reactions, with abnormal returns generally neutral or slightly positive.

Conclusions

Most PRs announce firstly the positivity of a clinical trial, without detailed results. The market appears to absorb this information with minimal stock price adjustments.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信