Hannah Decker MD, MAS , Manami Diaz Tsuzuki BA , Emilia De Marchis MD , Jill Zawisza BA , Mary Martinez BA , Tasce Bongiovanni MD, MHS, MPP
{"title":"Screening for Intimate Partner Violence After Traumatic Injury: A Community-Based Participatory Qualitative Research Study","authors":"Hannah Decker MD, MAS , Manami Diaz Tsuzuki BA , Emilia De Marchis MD , Jill Zawisza BA , Mary Martinez BA , Tasce Bongiovanni MD, MHS, MPP","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.03.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is common among injured patients and adversely impacts health. We sought to better understand acceptability and appropriateness of screening for IPV following traumatic injury.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a qualitative, community-based participatory research study in partnership with a community-based organization focused on supporting survivors of IPV. We conducted semistructured interviews exploring attitudes and opinions about IPV screening after injury with English- and Spanish-speaking adults who were IPV survivors or who were admitted to a level 1 trauma center after traumatic injury. We developed a codebook based on the Health Equity Implementation Framework and analyzed data using thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We conducted 19 interviews. Participants included twelve IPV survivors, ten women, seven men, and two nonbinary participants. Three interviews were conducted in Spanish. Four themes emerged as follows: 1) participants with a history of IPV described major barriers to disclosure to clinicians; 2) despite these barriers, participants widely supported the practice of asking about IPV; 3) participants highlighted key tactics to improve the experience of inquiry, screening, and disclosure after traumatic injury; and 4) participants largely did not mind the screening questions commonly used to screen patients with traumatic injuries, but identified key gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In-hospital screening for IPV among patients with traumatic injury was generally acceptable to study the participants. However, the manner in which the screening is conducted is important to both survivors and participants without a history of IPV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"309 ","pages":"Pages 233-241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425001507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is common among injured patients and adversely impacts health. We sought to better understand acceptability and appropriateness of screening for IPV following traumatic injury.
Methods
We conducted a qualitative, community-based participatory research study in partnership with a community-based organization focused on supporting survivors of IPV. We conducted semistructured interviews exploring attitudes and opinions about IPV screening after injury with English- and Spanish-speaking adults who were IPV survivors or who were admitted to a level 1 trauma center after traumatic injury. We developed a codebook based on the Health Equity Implementation Framework and analyzed data using thematic analysis.
Results
We conducted 19 interviews. Participants included twelve IPV survivors, ten women, seven men, and two nonbinary participants. Three interviews were conducted in Spanish. Four themes emerged as follows: 1) participants with a history of IPV described major barriers to disclosure to clinicians; 2) despite these barriers, participants widely supported the practice of asking about IPV; 3) participants highlighted key tactics to improve the experience of inquiry, screening, and disclosure after traumatic injury; and 4) participants largely did not mind the screening questions commonly used to screen patients with traumatic injuries, but identified key gaps.
Conclusions
In-hospital screening for IPV among patients with traumatic injury was generally acceptable to study the participants. However, the manner in which the screening is conducted is important to both survivors and participants without a history of IPV.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.