Readmission and Adoption of Early Discharge After Colectomy Using ACS-NSQIP: Is it Time for Widespread Adoption?

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Racquel S. Gaetani MD, Michael M. Jonczyk MD, MSc, David A. Kleiman MD, MSc, Angela H. Kuhnen MD, MPH, Peter W. Marcello MD, Julia T. Saraidaridis MD, MMs, Jonathan S. Abelson MD, MS
{"title":"Readmission and Adoption of Early Discharge After Colectomy Using ACS-NSQIP: Is it Time for Widespread Adoption?","authors":"Racquel S. Gaetani MD,&nbsp;Michael M. Jonczyk MD, MSc,&nbsp;David A. Kleiman MD, MSc,&nbsp;Angela H. Kuhnen MD, MPH,&nbsp;Peter W. Marcello MD,&nbsp;Julia T. Saraidaridis MD, MMs,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Abelson MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The timing of post-operative discharge following colectomy procedures remains a subject of debate among colorectal surgeons. Prior studies have demonstrated the safety and adoption of early discharge within 24 h after elective colectomy in carefully selected patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the American COllege of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) from 2012 to 2021. Adult patients undergoing elective partial colectomy with primary anastomosis and documented length of stay were included. Patients were stratified into early (&lt; 24) and non early (≥24 h) discharge groups. Propensity score matching was used to control for baseline demographics and non-modifiable risk factors. Primary outcomes included 30-day readmission rates and adoption trends of early discharge over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 282,037 patients met inclusion criteria of which 6364 (2.3%) were discharged within 24 h. On propensity score matching the early discharge cohort had a statistically significantly lower rate of readmission (5.5% <em>versus</em> 7.3%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Additionally, the early discharge group had a significantly reduced rate of anastomotic leak (1.0 <em>versus</em> 2.6%), ileus (2.0% <em>versus</em> 7.6%), and rate of reoperation (1.2% <em>versus</em> 4.0%) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The proportion of early discharge colectomies increased from 0.8% in 2012 to 3.6% in 2021 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In carefully selected patients, early discharge after colectomy with primary anastomosis does not increase the risk of readmission, reoperation, or 30-d complication rates. Furthermore, the increasing trend in utilization of early discharge after colectomy suggests an increasing acceptance of this practice, though it remains a minority of all colectomies performed among institutions participating in ACS-NSQIP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"309 ","pages":"Pages 242-248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425001428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The timing of post-operative discharge following colectomy procedures remains a subject of debate among colorectal surgeons. Prior studies have demonstrated the safety and adoption of early discharge within 24 h after elective colectomy in carefully selected patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the American COllege of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) from 2012 to 2021. Adult patients undergoing elective partial colectomy with primary anastomosis and documented length of stay were included. Patients were stratified into early (< 24) and non early (≥24 h) discharge groups. Propensity score matching was used to control for baseline demographics and non-modifiable risk factors. Primary outcomes included 30-day readmission rates and adoption trends of early discharge over time.

Results

A total of 282,037 patients met inclusion criteria of which 6364 (2.3%) were discharged within 24 h. On propensity score matching the early discharge cohort had a statistically significantly lower rate of readmission (5.5% versus 7.3%, P < 0.001). Additionally, the early discharge group had a significantly reduced rate of anastomotic leak (1.0 versus 2.6%), ileus (2.0% versus 7.6%), and rate of reoperation (1.2% versus 4.0%) (P < 0.001). The proportion of early discharge colectomies increased from 0.8% in 2012 to 3.6% in 2021 (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In carefully selected patients, early discharge after colectomy with primary anastomosis does not increase the risk of readmission, reoperation, or 30-d complication rates. Furthermore, the increasing trend in utilization of early discharge after colectomy suggests an increasing acceptance of this practice, though it remains a minority of all colectomies performed among institutions participating in ACS-NSQIP.
使用ACS-NSQIP进行结肠切除术后早期出院的再入院和采用:是时候广泛采用了吗?
结肠切除术后的出院时间一直是结直肠外科医生争论的话题。先前的研究表明,在精心挑选的患者中,择期结肠切除术后24小时内早期出院是安全可行的。方法本回顾性队列研究利用2012年至2021年美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)的数据。接受择期结肠部分切除术和一期吻合的成年患者以及记录的住院时间。将患者分为早期(<;24)和非早期(≥24 h)放电组。倾向评分匹配用于控制基线人口统计学和不可改变的危险因素。主要结局包括30天再入院率和早期出院的采用趋势。结果共282037例患者符合纳入标准,其中6364例(2.3%)在24 h内出院。在倾向评分匹配上,早期出院队列的再入院率较低(5.5%比7.3%,P <;0.001)。此外,早期出院组的吻合口漏率(1.0比2.6%)、肠梗阻率(2.0%比7.6%)和再手术率(1.2%比4.0%)显著降低(P <;0.001)。早期出院结肠切除术的比例从2012年的0.8%上升到2021年的3.6% (P <;0.001)。结论在精心挑选的患者中,一期吻合结肠切除术后早期出院不会增加再入院、再手术的风险,也不会增加30 d的并发症发生率。此外,结肠切除术后早期出院的使用率越来越高,这表明人们越来越接受这种做法,尽管在参与ACS-NSQIP的机构中,它仍然是所有结肠切除术的一小部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信