External Validation of CRASH Prognostic Model in an Urban Tertiary Care Public University Hospital

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Asif Mulla MS , Devi Bavishi MD , Monty Khajanchi DNB , Martin Gerdin Wärnberg MD, PhD
{"title":"External Validation of CRASH Prognostic Model in an Urban Tertiary Care Public University Hospital","authors":"Asif Mulla MS ,&nbsp;Devi Bavishi MD ,&nbsp;Monty Khajanchi DNB ,&nbsp;Martin Gerdin Wärnberg MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.03.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Trauma represents 9% of global mortality, where traumatic brain injuries are the leading cause in low-middle income countries, most commonly due to road traffic injuries. The multicenter randomized controlled trial CRASH (corticosteroid randomization after significant head injury) published a prediction model to estimate prognosis in traumatic brain injury patients. This prediction model was derived based on data from high-, low-, and middle-income countries. The external validity of this prediction model was not assessed in low and middle-income countries. To fill this gap, we aim to external validate the CRASH prediction model in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients in India, a lower-middle-income country.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a prospective observational study at the General Surgery department of an urban tertiary care hospital in India. We collected data on the 14-d mortality and 6-mo unfavorable outcomes in patients with TBI. Calibration and discrimination of the CRASH models (basic and computed tomography [CT] model) comparing the observed and predicted outcomes using logistic regression, and area under the curve was analyzed to validate the model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In this study, 417 patients with the median age of 40 y and age range of 18-95 y were evaluated. There was no significant difference between the calibration of the models in prediction of a 14-d mortality (basic <em>P</em> = 0.082, CT <em>P</em> = 0.067) and 6-mo unfavorable outcome (basic <em>P</em> = 0.688, CT <em>P</em> = 0.204). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in basic and CT models in prediction of 14-d mortality were 0.885 and 0.885 respectively. In addition, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in basic and CT models in prediction of 6-mo unfavorable outcome were 0.901 and 0.896, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results of this study showed that the CRASH basic and CT model both accurately predict 14 d mortality and 6 mo unfavorable outcomes of TBI patients in an urban tertiary care public university hospital in India.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"309 ","pages":"Pages 224-232"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425001611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Trauma represents 9% of global mortality, where traumatic brain injuries are the leading cause in low-middle income countries, most commonly due to road traffic injuries. The multicenter randomized controlled trial CRASH (corticosteroid randomization after significant head injury) published a prediction model to estimate prognosis in traumatic brain injury patients. This prediction model was derived based on data from high-, low-, and middle-income countries. The external validity of this prediction model was not assessed in low and middle-income countries. To fill this gap, we aim to external validate the CRASH prediction model in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients in India, a lower-middle-income country.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study at the General Surgery department of an urban tertiary care hospital in India. We collected data on the 14-d mortality and 6-mo unfavorable outcomes in patients with TBI. Calibration and discrimination of the CRASH models (basic and computed tomography [CT] model) comparing the observed and predicted outcomes using logistic regression, and area under the curve was analyzed to validate the model.

Results

In this study, 417 patients with the median age of 40 y and age range of 18-95 y were evaluated. There was no significant difference between the calibration of the models in prediction of a 14-d mortality (basic P = 0.082, CT P = 0.067) and 6-mo unfavorable outcome (basic P = 0.688, CT P = 0.204). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in basic and CT models in prediction of 14-d mortality were 0.885 and 0.885 respectively. In addition, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in basic and CT models in prediction of 6-mo unfavorable outcome were 0.901 and 0.896, respectively.

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that the CRASH basic and CT model both accurately predict 14 d mortality and 6 mo unfavorable outcomes of TBI patients in an urban tertiary care public university hospital in India.

Abstract Image

城市三级公立大学医院CRASH预后模型的外部验证
创伤占全球死亡率的9%,其中创伤性脑损伤是中低收入国家的主要原因,最常见的原因是道路交通伤害。多中心随机对照试验CRASH(重大脑损伤后皮质类固醇随机化)发表了一个预测模型来估计创伤性脑损伤患者的预后。该预测模型是根据来自高、低和中等收入国家的数据得出的。该预测模型的外部有效性未在低收入和中等收入国家进行评估。为了填补这一空白,我们的目标是对印度(一个中低收入国家)创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的CRASH预测模型进行外部验证。方法我们在印度一家城市三级医院的普通外科进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。我们收集了TBI患者14天死亡率和6个月不良预后的数据。采用logistic回归对CRASH模型(基本模型和计算机断层扫描[CT]模型)进行校正和判别,比较观察结果和预测结果,并分析曲线下面积以验证模型。结果本研究共纳入417例患者,中位年龄40岁,年龄范围18-95岁。模型校正在预测14天死亡率(基本P = 0.082, CT P = 0.067)和6个月不良结局(基本P = 0.688, CT P = 0.204)方面无显著差异。基本模型和CT模型预测14 d死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.885和0.885。此外,基本模型和CT模型预测6个月不良预后的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.901和0.896。结论CRASH基本模型和CT模型均能准确预测印度某城市三级公立大学医院TBI患者的14天死亡率和6个月不良预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信