Drivers, barriers and policy options to renewable energy development in Native American communities: A systematic review

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Chinedu C. Nsude , Shane Connelly , Firat Demir , Dingjing Shi , Katerina Tsetsura
{"title":"Drivers, barriers and policy options to renewable energy development in Native American communities: A systematic review","authors":"Chinedu C. Nsude ,&nbsp;Shane Connelly ,&nbsp;Firat Demir ,&nbsp;Dingjing Shi ,&nbsp;Katerina Tsetsura","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper reviews the existing literature on the adoption of renewable energy technologies (RETs) in reference to energy transition justice for Native American communities. Based on 31 journal articles published between 2003 and 2024, we identify twelve drivers categorized into four themes (technical, environmental, economic, and socio-cultural) and thirteen barriers classified into five themes (technical, environmental, policy, economic, and socio-cultural) to RETs development in Native American communities. We find that the socio-cultural theme is more prevalent than other themes across literature, showing that the socio-cultural dynamics are deeply rooted in the broader identity, history, and governance structures of Native American communities. Our study also finds that, among available RETs, wind energy is studied the most, followed by solar, biofuel, geothermal, and hydropower. Notably, topics on other renewables, such as hydrogen or ocean/tidal energy development in Native American communities, were the least studied. We highlight the need for additional research on all types of RETs based on energy needs, energy source preferences, and existing endowments of Native American communities. We argue that the additional research on these topics will also help foster resilient energy systems and energy sovereignty in Native American communities. Our findings further the scholarship regarding the drivers and barriers to RETs adoption, and develop strategies that Native Nations, RETs developers, and researchers can employ to ensure a just energy transition and sustainable development for Native American communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104092"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001732","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reviews the existing literature on the adoption of renewable energy technologies (RETs) in reference to energy transition justice for Native American communities. Based on 31 journal articles published between 2003 and 2024, we identify twelve drivers categorized into four themes (technical, environmental, economic, and socio-cultural) and thirteen barriers classified into five themes (technical, environmental, policy, economic, and socio-cultural) to RETs development in Native American communities. We find that the socio-cultural theme is more prevalent than other themes across literature, showing that the socio-cultural dynamics are deeply rooted in the broader identity, history, and governance structures of Native American communities. Our study also finds that, among available RETs, wind energy is studied the most, followed by solar, biofuel, geothermal, and hydropower. Notably, topics on other renewables, such as hydrogen or ocean/tidal energy development in Native American communities, were the least studied. We highlight the need for additional research on all types of RETs based on energy needs, energy source preferences, and existing endowments of Native American communities. We argue that the additional research on these topics will also help foster resilient energy systems and energy sovereignty in Native American communities. Our findings further the scholarship regarding the drivers and barriers to RETs adoption, and develop strategies that Native Nations, RETs developers, and researchers can employ to ensure a just energy transition and sustainable development for Native American communities.
美国原住民社区可再生能源发展的驱动因素、障碍和政策选择:系统回顾
本文回顾了现有文献采用可再生能源技术(RETs)参考能源转型正义的美洲原住民社区。基于2003年至2024年间发表的31篇期刊文章,我们确定了美国原住民社区RETs发展的12个驱动因素,分为4个主题(技术、环境、经济和社会文化)和13个障碍,分为5个主题(技术、环境、政策、经济和社会文化)。我们发现,社会文化主题在文学作品中比其他主题更为普遍,这表明社会文化动态深深植根于美国原住民社区的更广泛的身份、历史和治理结构中。我们的研究还发现,在可再生能源中,风能被研究得最多,其次是太阳能、生物燃料、地热和水电。值得注意的是,关于其他可再生能源的主题,如氢或美洲原住民社区的海洋/潮汐能开发,研究得最少。我们强调需要根据能源需求、能源偏好和美国原住民社区现有的禀赋,对所有类型的RETs进行额外的研究。我们认为,对这些主题的进一步研究也将有助于促进美洲原住民社区的弹性能源系统和能源主权。我们的研究结果进一步研究了采用RETs的驱动因素和障碍,并制定了原住民、RETs开发商和研究人员可以采用的策略,以确保美洲原住民社区的公正能源转型和可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信