Mapping chemicals across EU’s legal frameworks towards a ‘one substance, one assessment’ approach

IF 10.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Mathilda Andreassen, Christina Rudén, Marlene Ågerstrand
{"title":"Mapping chemicals across EU’s legal frameworks towards a ‘one substance, one assessment’ approach","authors":"Mathilda Andreassen, Christina Rudén, Marlene Ågerstrand","doi":"10.1016/j.envint.2025.109460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemicals in the EU are mainly regulated based on their intended use. Each legal framework consists of requirements and guidance for hazard- and risk assessment, along with the associated decision processes e.g., registration or authorisation of chemicals for market access in the EU. As a single chemical may have multiple uses, it may be assessed under more than one framework, potentially leading to different assessment outcomes. To address this, the European Commission has introduced the ‘one substance, one assessment’ approach as part of the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability. The aims of the approach include streamlining risk assessment processes and reducing duplication of work in assessing the same chemical. This study aimed to map the scope of chemicals subject to assessment in multiple legal frameworks and to illustrate the importance of coordination and communication in chemical assessment processes. This was achieved by identifying chemicals that are either registered or have received specific approval for the EU market, and analysing their presence in different legal frameworks. Our findings showed that almost one-tenth of the substances identified were listed under more than one framework. However, there was a notable lack of coherent chemical identifiers available to accurately identify chemicals across the frameworks. Additionally, we identified the presence of phthalates, bisphenols and PFAS in EU frameworks to illustrate how a group-based approach to chemical assessment could be applied across different legal frameworks.","PeriodicalId":308,"journal":{"name":"Environment International","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment International","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109460","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemicals in the EU are mainly regulated based on their intended use. Each legal framework consists of requirements and guidance for hazard- and risk assessment, along with the associated decision processes e.g., registration or authorisation of chemicals for market access in the EU. As a single chemical may have multiple uses, it may be assessed under more than one framework, potentially leading to different assessment outcomes. To address this, the European Commission has introduced the ‘one substance, one assessment’ approach as part of the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability. The aims of the approach include streamlining risk assessment processes and reducing duplication of work in assessing the same chemical. This study aimed to map the scope of chemicals subject to assessment in multiple legal frameworks and to illustrate the importance of coordination and communication in chemical assessment processes. This was achieved by identifying chemicals that are either registered or have received specific approval for the EU market, and analysing their presence in different legal frameworks. Our findings showed that almost one-tenth of the substances identified were listed under more than one framework. However, there was a notable lack of coherent chemical identifiers available to accurately identify chemicals across the frameworks. Additionally, we identified the presence of phthalates, bisphenols and PFAS in EU frameworks to illustrate how a group-based approach to chemical assessment could be applied across different legal frameworks.

Abstract Image

在欧盟的法律框架内对化学物质进行“一种物质,一种评估”的方法
在欧盟,化学品主要是根据其预期用途进行监管的。每个法律框架都包括危害和风险评估的要求和指导,以及相关的决策过程,例如,化学品在欧盟市场准入的注册或授权。由于单一化学品可能有多种用途,因此可能在多个框架下对其进行评估,从而可能导致不同的评估结果。为了解决这个问题,欧盟委员会引入了“一种物质,一种评估”的方法,作为可持续发展化学品战略的一部分。该方法的目的包括简化风险评估过程和减少评估同一化学品的重复工作。这项研究的目的是绘制在多个法律框架中需要评估的化学品的范围,并说明在化学品评估过程中协调和沟通的重要性。这是通过识别已注册或已获得欧盟市场特定批准的化学品,并分析其在不同法律框架中的存在来实现的。我们的研究结果表明,几乎十分之一的确定物质在多个框架下列出。然而,明显缺乏连贯的化学标识符来准确地识别跨框架的化学品。此外,我们确定了欧盟框架中邻苯二甲酸盐、双酚类和PFAS的存在,以说明如何将基于分组的化学评估方法应用于不同的法律框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environment International
Environment International 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
734
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health publishes manuscripts focusing on critical aspects of environmental and occupational medicine, including studies in toxicology and epidemiology, to illuminate the human health implications of exposure to environmental hazards. The journal adopts an open-access model and practices open peer review. It caters to scientists and practitioners across all environmental science domains, directly or indirectly impacting human health and well-being. With a commitment to enhancing the prevention of environmentally-related health risks, Environmental Health serves as a public health journal for the community and scientists engaged in matters of public health significance concerning the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信