Physical education in rural schools: A scoping review

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Christopher Hudson, Riki Lindsay, Luiza Goncalves, Elizabeth McNeil, Josh Ambrosy
{"title":"Physical education in rural schools: A scoping review","authors":"Christopher Hudson, Riki Lindsay, Luiza Goncalves, Elizabeth McNeil, Josh Ambrosy","doi":"10.1177/1356336x251334547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While research on rural education has increased over the last decade, the focus on physical education (PE) in this body of knowledge is limited. The purpose of this scoping review was twofold: (1) to offer an overview of the international research on PE in rural schools, and (2) to discuss and analyse the existing body of literature on rural PE. Specifically, we explored the question: what do we know about PE in rural schools? The present review was conducted according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A total of 281 articles were screened against inclusion and exclusion criteria in three stages: (1) title screen, (2) abstract screen, and (3) full-text screen. A total of 24 studies underwent two stages of analysis. First, the matrix was analysed inductively to identify characteristics of the publications. Second, the authors developed a ‘living codebook’ to track, refine, debate, and agree on the final analytical codes. Three themes were developed in the analysis: (1) a deficit narrative of rural PE, (2) rural schools as sites of PE intervention, and (3) rural schools leverage partnerships to enhance their capacity to deliver PE. These findings were mainly constrained to the dominant perspectives emanating from Australia and the United States. We conclude the review by suggesting that to further advance knowledge of rural PE, there need to be more strengths-based investigations of how PE is positively enacted in more and different rural schools, especially across broader international contexts.","PeriodicalId":47681,"journal":{"name":"European Physical Education Review","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Physical Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x251334547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While research on rural education has increased over the last decade, the focus on physical education (PE) in this body of knowledge is limited. The purpose of this scoping review was twofold: (1) to offer an overview of the international research on PE in rural schools, and (2) to discuss and analyse the existing body of literature on rural PE. Specifically, we explored the question: what do we know about PE in rural schools? The present review was conducted according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A total of 281 articles were screened against inclusion and exclusion criteria in three stages: (1) title screen, (2) abstract screen, and (3) full-text screen. A total of 24 studies underwent two stages of analysis. First, the matrix was analysed inductively to identify characteristics of the publications. Second, the authors developed a ‘living codebook’ to track, refine, debate, and agree on the final analytical codes. Three themes were developed in the analysis: (1) a deficit narrative of rural PE, (2) rural schools as sites of PE intervention, and (3) rural schools leverage partnerships to enhance their capacity to deliver PE. These findings were mainly constrained to the dominant perspectives emanating from Australia and the United States. We conclude the review by suggesting that to further advance knowledge of rural PE, there need to be more strengths-based investigations of how PE is positively enacted in more and different rural schools, especially across broader international contexts.
农村学校的体育教育:范围审查
在过去的十年里,对农村教育的研究有所增加,但对体育教育的关注却很有限。这一范围审查的目的有两个:(1)概述农村学校体育的国际研究,(2)讨论和分析现有的农村体育文献。具体来说,我们探讨了这样一个问题:我们对农村学校的体育了解多少?本次审查是根据PRISMA-ScR指南进行的。共有281篇文章按照纳入和排除标准分为三个阶段进行筛选:(1)标题筛选,(2)摘要筛选,(3)全文筛选。共有24项研究经历了两个阶段的分析。首先,对矩阵进行归纳分析,以确定出版物的特征。其次,作者开发了一个“活密码本”来跟踪、改进、辩论并就最终的分析代码达成一致。在分析中发展了三个主题:(1)农村体育的赤字叙事;(2)农村学校作为体育干预的场所;(3)农村学校利用伙伴关系来提高其提供体育的能力。这些发现主要局限于来自澳大利亚和美国的主流观点。最后,我们建议,为了进一步提高对农村体育的认识,需要进行更多基于优势的调查,以了解体育是如何在更多不同的农村学校中积极实施的,特别是在更广泛的国际背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Physical Education Review
European Physical Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: - Multidisciplinary Approaches: European Physical Education Review brings together contributions from a wide range of disciplines across the natural and social sciences and humanities. It includes theoretical and research-based articles and occasionally devotes Special Issues to major topics and themes within the field. - International Coverage: European Physical Education Review publishes contributions from Europe and all regions of the world, promoting international communication among scholars and professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信