Understanding Anti-Trans Sanctuary Harm in Domestic Violence Services: The Role of Polyvictimization and Biographical Factors.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Brandon M Craig
{"title":"Understanding Anti-Trans Sanctuary Harm in Domestic Violence Services: The Role of Polyvictimization and Biographical Factors.","authors":"Brandon M Craig","doi":"10.1177/08862605251333431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transgender (trans) people comprise about 2 million members of the U.S. population. While these communities are blueprints for culture and liberation, they face an acute threat of interpersonal violence, including domestic violence (DV) by intimate partners and family. Trans people are especially susceptible to polyvictimization: experiencing multiple types of violence, often across multiple settings. Furthermore, the negative impacts of violence are often compounded by institutional discrimination when seeking help, or sanctuary harm. For trans survivors of DV, it is crucial that researchers understand group differences in sanctuary harm during help-seeking-differences not only by identity and other biographical traits but also by sanctuary harm experiences in other institutional settings (e.g., healthcare, legal services). To explore associations between these factors, the current study presents a secondary analysis of data from the 2011 National Transgender Discrimination Survey, a large sample of trans and gender nonconforming adults living in the United States, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam. Two binary logistic regressions model the relationship between several biographical and sanctuary harm predictors, and the study outcome of anti-trans sanctuary harm in DV services. Results indicate that sanctuary harm in four other settings-ambulance/emergency medical technician, mental health clinic, drug treatment program, and legal services-significantly predicts the same type of victimization in a DV services context. Some biographical factors were also significant: being more visibly nonconforming, being marginally housed, and ever engaging in sex work were all associated with higher odds of the dependent variable. Study limitations, suggestions for future research, and implications for comprehensive and intersectional DV services are discussed.","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":"72 1","pages":"8862605251333431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251333431","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transgender (trans) people comprise about 2 million members of the U.S. population. While these communities are blueprints for culture and liberation, they face an acute threat of interpersonal violence, including domestic violence (DV) by intimate partners and family. Trans people are especially susceptible to polyvictimization: experiencing multiple types of violence, often across multiple settings. Furthermore, the negative impacts of violence are often compounded by institutional discrimination when seeking help, or sanctuary harm. For trans survivors of DV, it is crucial that researchers understand group differences in sanctuary harm during help-seeking-differences not only by identity and other biographical traits but also by sanctuary harm experiences in other institutional settings (e.g., healthcare, legal services). To explore associations between these factors, the current study presents a secondary analysis of data from the 2011 National Transgender Discrimination Survey, a large sample of trans and gender nonconforming adults living in the United States, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam. Two binary logistic regressions model the relationship between several biographical and sanctuary harm predictors, and the study outcome of anti-trans sanctuary harm in DV services. Results indicate that sanctuary harm in four other settings-ambulance/emergency medical technician, mental health clinic, drug treatment program, and legal services-significantly predicts the same type of victimization in a DV services context. Some biographical factors were also significant: being more visibly nonconforming, being marginally housed, and ever engaging in sex work were all associated with higher odds of the dependent variable. Study limitations, suggestions for future research, and implications for comprehensive and intersectional DV services are discussed.
了解家庭暴力服务中的反跨性别庇护伤害:多重受害和传记因素的作用。
跨性别者(trans)在美国人口中约占200万。虽然这些社区是文化和解放的蓝图,但它们面临着人际暴力的严重威胁,包括亲密伴侣和家人的家庭暴力。跨性别者尤其容易受到多重伤害:经常在多种环境中遭受多种类型的暴力。此外,暴力的负面影响往往因寻求帮助时的体制歧视或庇护所伤害而加剧。对于家暴的跨性别幸存者来说,研究人员了解在寻求帮助期间庇护伤害的群体差异是至关重要的,这些差异不仅来自身份和其他传记特征,还来自其他机构环境(如医疗保健、法律服务)中的庇护伤害经历。为了探索这些因素之间的关联,本研究对2011年全国跨性别歧视调查的数据进行了二次分析,该调查对生活在美国、波多黎各、美属维尔京群岛和关岛的跨性别和性别不符合标准的成年人进行了大样本调查。两个二元logistic回归模型的几个传记性和庇护所伤害预测因子之间的关系,以及家庭暴力服务中反变性庇护所伤害的研究结果。结果表明,在救护车/紧急医疗技术人员、心理健康诊所、药物治疗计划和法律服务等其他四种环境中,庇护所伤害显著地预测了家庭暴力服务环境中相同类型的受害。一些传记性因素也很重要:更明显的不守规矩,被边缘化,以及曾经从事过性工作,这些都与因变量的高几率有关。本文讨论了研究的局限性、未来研究的建议以及对综合和交叉家庭家庭服务的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信