Increasing severity of large-scale fires prolongs recovery time of forests globally since 2001

IF 13.9 1区 生物学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Qiancheng Lv, Ziyue Chen, Chaoyang Wu, Josep Peñuelas, Lei Fan, Yongxian Su, Zeyu Yang, Manchun Li, Bingbo Gao, Jianqiang Hu, Chaoqun Zhang, Yuheng Fu, Qiao Wang
{"title":"Increasing severity of large-scale fires prolongs recovery time of forests globally since 2001","authors":"Qiancheng Lv, Ziyue Chen, Chaoyang Wu, Josep Peñuelas, Lei Fan, Yongxian Su, Zeyu Yang, Manchun Li, Bingbo Gao, Jianqiang Hu, Chaoqun Zhang, Yuheng Fu, Qiao Wang","doi":"10.1038/s41559-025-02683-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ongoing and sharply increased global forest fires, especially extreme large-scale fires (LFs) with their greater destructiveness, have significantly altered forest structures and functions. However, long-term variations in the severity of LFs and corresponding effects on the natural post-LF recovery time of global forests remain unclear. Here, we rigorously identified 3,281 global large-scale (&gt;10 km<sup>2</sup>) single-time fire events (LSFs) from 2001 to 2021, and used multiple indicators to understand the post-LSF recovery dynamics from different perspectives and comprehensively reveal major driving factors across regions and forests types based on multiple models. Compared with pre-2010, LSFs after 2010 caused greater forest damage, with the fire severity expanding further from low to high latitudes and from humid to arid regions, particularly affecting evergreen needleleaf forests. Fewer than one-third of the forests recovered successfully within 7 years, and most of these were tropical, moisture-rich broadleaf forests. The average time required for three indicators to recover to pre-fire conditions increased by 7.5% (vegetation density), 11.1% (canopy structure) and 27.3% (gross primary productivity). Moreover, the positive sensitivity of recovery time to increased fire severity was significantly intensified. Notably, more forests experienced recovery stagnation with increased severity, especially in boreal forests, further extending recovery time. The negative impact of the severity of LSFs on forest recovery was much stronger than that of post-LSF climate conditions. Soil moisture after LSFs was identified as the primary facilitating factor. Temperature generally had a positive role before 2010, but a strong negative influence on post-LSF forest recovery after 2010. These findings provide a useful reference for better understanding global forest recovery mechanisms, estimating forest carbon sinks and implementing post-LSF management accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":18835,"journal":{"name":"Nature ecology & evolution","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature ecology & evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-025-02683-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ongoing and sharply increased global forest fires, especially extreme large-scale fires (LFs) with their greater destructiveness, have significantly altered forest structures and functions. However, long-term variations in the severity of LFs and corresponding effects on the natural post-LF recovery time of global forests remain unclear. Here, we rigorously identified 3,281 global large-scale (>10 km2) single-time fire events (LSFs) from 2001 to 2021, and used multiple indicators to understand the post-LSF recovery dynamics from different perspectives and comprehensively reveal major driving factors across regions and forests types based on multiple models. Compared with pre-2010, LSFs after 2010 caused greater forest damage, with the fire severity expanding further from low to high latitudes and from humid to arid regions, particularly affecting evergreen needleleaf forests. Fewer than one-third of the forests recovered successfully within 7 years, and most of these were tropical, moisture-rich broadleaf forests. The average time required for three indicators to recover to pre-fire conditions increased by 7.5% (vegetation density), 11.1% (canopy structure) and 27.3% (gross primary productivity). Moreover, the positive sensitivity of recovery time to increased fire severity was significantly intensified. Notably, more forests experienced recovery stagnation with increased severity, especially in boreal forests, further extending recovery time. The negative impact of the severity of LSFs on forest recovery was much stronger than that of post-LSF climate conditions. Soil moisture after LSFs was identified as the primary facilitating factor. Temperature generally had a positive role before 2010, but a strong negative influence on post-LSF forest recovery after 2010. These findings provide a useful reference for better understanding global forest recovery mechanisms, estimating forest carbon sinks and implementing post-LSF management accordingly.

Abstract Image

自 2001 年以来,大规模火灾的严重程度不断增加,延长了全球森林的恢复时间
持续不断和急剧增加的全球森林火灾,特别是破坏性更大的极端大规模火灾(LFs),已显著改变了森林结构和功能。然而,全球森林低度退化严重程度的长期变化及其对低度退化后自然恢复时间的影响尚不清楚。在此基础上,对2001 - 2021年全球3281次大规模(10 km2)单次火灾事件进行了严格识别,采用多指标从不同角度了解火灾后的恢复动态,并基于多模型综合揭示了不同区域和森林类型的主要驱动因素。与2010年前相比,2010年以后lfs造成的森林破坏更大,火灾严重程度从低纬度向高纬度扩展,从湿润地区向干旱地区扩展,尤其是常绿针叶林。不到三分之一的森林在7年内成功恢复,其中大多数是热带、富含水分的阔叶林。三个指标恢复到火灾前状态所需的平均时间分别增加了7.5%(植被密度)、11.1%(冠层结构)和27.3%(总初级生产力)。此外,恢复时间对火灾严重程度的正敏感性显著增强。值得注意的是,更多的森林,特别是北方森林,经历了更加严重的恢复停滞,进一步延长了恢复时间。lsf严重程度对森林恢复的负面影响远大于lsf后气候条件的负面影响。土壤水分被确定为主要促进因子。气温在2010年之前总体上对森林恢复有积极作用,但在2010年之后对森林恢复有较强的消极影响。这些发现为更好地理解全球森林恢复机制、估算森林碳汇和实施森林退化后管理提供了有益的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature ecology & evolution
Nature ecology & evolution Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
22.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Nature Ecology & Evolution is interested in the full spectrum of ecological and evolutionary biology, encompassing approaches at the molecular, organismal, population, community and ecosystem levels, as well as relevant parts of the social sciences. Nature Ecology & Evolution provides a place where all researchers and policymakers interested in all aspects of life's diversity can come together to learn about the most accomplished and significant advances in the field and to discuss topical issues. An online-only monthly journal, our broad scope ensures that the research published reaches the widest possible audience of scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信