Applying three theoretical lenses to further explore the boomerang career transition

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Ans De Vos, Sherry E. Sullivan
{"title":"Applying three theoretical lenses to further explore the boomerang career transition","authors":"Ans De Vos,&nbsp;Sherry E. Sullivan","doi":"10.1111/apps.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article adds theoretical reflections on the boomerang transition process as presented by the Authors in their article ‘Examining boomerang mobility using a career transitions framework’. Based on their integration of previous studies of boomerang mobility with conservation of resources theory and the literature on career transitions, the authors provide a model that reflects the complexity of the boomerang process. The model advances our understanding of the dynamic nature of modern career transitions, which often deviate from traditional linear career paths. In this article, we further explore three of the key insights from the authors' model, namely the importance of time, the individual-based perspective, and the integration of both work and nonwork factors. Building from our own work in the field of career transitions, we use three theoretical lenses to guide our exploration, namely, the kaleidoscope career model (KCM), career inaction theory, and sustainable career theory. We discuss how the authors' model may be expanded by integrating it with these perspectives and how this can contribute to further incorporating the role of time in future research on the boomerang transition process. We advocate taking a whole career perspective, in which more than just the push and pull factors that influence the individual's decision to leave their previous employer are included. The boomerang transition can be further understood as it relates to an individual's past transitions and how it might impact future transitions as well as the influence of relationships, context, nonrationality, and forward and backward calculations on the boomerang decision-making and transition processes. We formulate several directions for the future study of boomerang transitions from this perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.70010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article adds theoretical reflections on the boomerang transition process as presented by the Authors in their article ‘Examining boomerang mobility using a career transitions framework’. Based on their integration of previous studies of boomerang mobility with conservation of resources theory and the literature on career transitions, the authors provide a model that reflects the complexity of the boomerang process. The model advances our understanding of the dynamic nature of modern career transitions, which often deviate from traditional linear career paths. In this article, we further explore three of the key insights from the authors' model, namely the importance of time, the individual-based perspective, and the integration of both work and nonwork factors. Building from our own work in the field of career transitions, we use three theoretical lenses to guide our exploration, namely, the kaleidoscope career model (KCM), career inaction theory, and sustainable career theory. We discuss how the authors' model may be expanded by integrating it with these perspectives and how this can contribute to further incorporating the role of time in future research on the boomerang transition process. We advocate taking a whole career perspective, in which more than just the push and pull factors that influence the individual's decision to leave their previous employer are included. The boomerang transition can be further understood as it relates to an individual's past transitions and how it might impact future transitions as well as the influence of relationships, context, nonrationality, and forward and backward calculations on the boomerang decision-making and transition processes. We formulate several directions for the future study of boomerang transitions from this perspective.

运用三种理论视角进一步探索回旋职业转换
本文补充了作者在其文章《利用职业生涯过渡框架考察回旋镖式流动》中提出的对回旋镖式过渡过程的理论思考。作者将以往对回旋镖式流动的研究与资源保护理论和有关职业过渡的文献进行了整合,在此基础上提供了一个反映回旋镖式流动过程复杂性的模型。该模型加深了我们对现代职业转换动态性质的理解,因为现代职业转换往往偏离传统的线性职业路径。在本文中,我们将进一步探讨作者模型中的三个关键见解,即时间的重要性、基于个人的视角以及工作和非工作因素的结合。基于我们自己在职业生涯转型领域的工作,我们使用三个理论视角来指导我们的探索,即万花筒职业生涯模型(KCM)、职业生涯不作为理论和可持续职业生涯理论。我们讨论了如何通过将作者的模型与这些观点相结合来扩展模型,以及这如何有助于将时间的作用进一步纳入未来关于回旋镖过渡过程的研究中。我们主张从整个职业生涯的角度出发,将影响个人决定离开前雇主的推拉因素纳入其中。我们还可以进一步理解 "回旋加速器 "式职业生涯转换与个人过去的职业生涯转换之间的关系,以及它可能对未来职业生涯转换产生的影响,还可以理解人际关系、背景、非理性、前向和后向计算对 "回旋加速器 "式职业生涯转换决策和转换过程的影响。从这个角度出发,我们为未来的回旋镖过渡研究提出了几个方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: "Applied Psychology: An International Review" is the esteemed official journal of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP), a venerable organization established in 1920 that unites scholars and practitioners in the field of applied psychology. This peer-reviewed journal serves as a global platform for the scholarly exchange of research findings within the diverse domain of applied psychology. The journal embraces a wide array of topics within applied psychology, including organizational, cross-cultural, educational, health, counseling, environmental, traffic, and sport psychology. It particularly encourages submissions that enhance the understanding of psychological processes in various applied settings and studies that explore the impact of different national and cultural contexts on psychological phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信