Sensitivity of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Clinical Research in Deep Gray Matter

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Fahad Salman, Abhisri Ramesh, Thomas Jochmann, Mirjam Prayer, Ademola Adegbemigun, Jack A. Reeves, Gregory E. Wilding, Junghun Cho, Dejan Jakimovski, Niels Bergsland, Michael G. Dwyer, Robert Zivadinov, Ferdinand Schweser
{"title":"Sensitivity of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Clinical Research in Deep Gray Matter","authors":"Fahad Salman,&nbsp;Abhisri Ramesh,&nbsp;Thomas Jochmann,&nbsp;Mirjam Prayer,&nbsp;Ademola Adegbemigun,&nbsp;Jack A. Reeves,&nbsp;Gregory E. Wilding,&nbsp;Junghun Cho,&nbsp;Dejan Jakimovski,&nbsp;Niels Bergsland,&nbsp;Michael G. Dwyer,&nbsp;Robert Zivadinov,&nbsp;Ferdinand Schweser","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is an advanced MRI technique for assessing iron, calcium, and myelin tissue levels based on magnetic susceptibility. QSM consists of multiple processing steps, with various choices for each step. While QSM is increasingly applied in neurodegenerative disease research, its reproducibility and sensitivity in detecting susceptibility changes across groups or over time, which underpin the interpretation of clinical outcomes, have not been thoroughly quantified. This study aimed to evaluate how choices in background field removal (BFR), dipole inversion algorithms, and anatomical referencing impact the detection of changes in deep gray matter susceptibility. We used aging-related changes in brain iron, established in earlier foundational studies, as a surrogate model to test the sensitivity and reproducibility of 378 different QSM pipelines toward the detection of longitudinal susceptibility changes in a clinical setting. We used 10-year follow-up data and scan-rescan data of healthy adults scanned at 3T. Our results demonstrated high variability in the sensitivity of QSM pipelines toward detecting susceptibility changes. While most pipelines detected the same over-time changes, the choice of the BFR algorithm and the referencing strategy influenced reproducibility error and sensitivity substantially. Notably, pipelines using RESHARP with AMP-PE, HEIDI, or LSQR inversion showed the highest overall sensitivity. The findings suggest a strong impact of algorithmic choices in QSM processing on the ability to detect physiological changes in the brain. Careful consideration should be given to the pipeline configuration for reliable clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70187","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is an advanced MRI technique for assessing iron, calcium, and myelin tissue levels based on magnetic susceptibility. QSM consists of multiple processing steps, with various choices for each step. While QSM is increasingly applied in neurodegenerative disease research, its reproducibility and sensitivity in detecting susceptibility changes across groups or over time, which underpin the interpretation of clinical outcomes, have not been thoroughly quantified. This study aimed to evaluate how choices in background field removal (BFR), dipole inversion algorithms, and anatomical referencing impact the detection of changes in deep gray matter susceptibility. We used aging-related changes in brain iron, established in earlier foundational studies, as a surrogate model to test the sensitivity and reproducibility of 378 different QSM pipelines toward the detection of longitudinal susceptibility changes in a clinical setting. We used 10-year follow-up data and scan-rescan data of healthy adults scanned at 3T. Our results demonstrated high variability in the sensitivity of QSM pipelines toward detecting susceptibility changes. While most pipelines detected the same over-time changes, the choice of the BFR algorithm and the referencing strategy influenced reproducibility error and sensitivity substantially. Notably, pipelines using RESHARP with AMP-PE, HEIDI, or LSQR inversion showed the highest overall sensitivity. The findings suggest a strong impact of algorithmic choices in QSM processing on the ability to detect physiological changes in the brain. Careful consideration should be given to the pipeline configuration for reliable clinical outcomes.

Abstract Image

深灰质定量易感性图谱在临床研究中的敏感性
定量磁感应强度图(QSM)是一种先进的磁共振成像技术,可根据磁感应强度评估铁、钙和髓鞘组织的水平。QSM 包括多个处理步骤,每个步骤都有不同的选择。虽然 QSM 越来越多地应用于神经退行性疾病研究,但它在检测不同组别或不同时间段的磁感应强度变化方面的可重复性和灵敏度(这是解释临床结果的基础)尚未得到彻底量化。本研究旨在评估背景场去除(BFR)、偶极子反演算法和解剖参考的选择对检测深部灰质易感性变化的影响。我们使用早期基础研究中确定的与衰老相关的脑铁变化作为替代模型,测试了 378 种不同 QSM 管道在临床环境中检测纵向易感性变化的灵敏度和可重复性。我们使用了 10 年的随访数据和 3T 扫描健康成人的扫描-再扫描数据。我们的结果表明,QSM 管道对检测易感性变化的灵敏度存在很大差异。虽然大多数管道检测到的随时间变化相同,但 BFR 算法和参考策略的选择对再现性误差和灵敏度有很大影响。值得注意的是,使用 RESHARP 与 AMP-PE、HEIDI 或 LSQR 反演的管道显示出最高的总体灵敏度。研究结果表明,QSM 处理中的算法选择对检测大脑生理变化的能力有很大影响。为了获得可靠的临床结果,应仔细考虑管道配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信