Economic and environmental benefits of recycled asphalt mixtures: impact of reclaimed asphalt pavement and additives throughout the life cycle

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Laiana Ferreira da Costa, Lara Pereira Tavares Mendes, Osires de Medeiros Melo Neto, Leda Christiane de Figueiredo Lopes Lucena, Luciana de Figueiredo Lopes Lucena
{"title":"Economic and environmental benefits of recycled asphalt mixtures: impact of reclaimed asphalt pavement and additives throughout the life cycle","authors":"Laiana Ferreira da Costa,&nbsp;Lara Pereira Tavares Mendes,&nbsp;Osires de Medeiros Melo Neto,&nbsp;Leda Christiane de Figueiredo Lopes Lucena,&nbsp;Luciana de Figueiredo Lopes Lucena","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-36362-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the economic and environmental advantages of using recycled asphalt mixtures with varying percentages of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP), cottonseed oil, and zeolite. The primary objective was to assess these mixtures’ life cycle impacts and costs compared to a traditional control mixture. The methodology employed includes Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost Assessment (LCCA), with a focus on endpoint impact categories such as ecosystem damage, human health, and resource availability. The analysis encompassed production, construction, and end-of-life phases, utilizing an 8.5% discount rate and a 10-year planning horizon. Results indicate that recycled asphalt mixtures with RAP and additives show significant environmental benefits, including reductions in impacts across all evaluated categories. Specifically, RAP incorporation led to substantial reductions in resource consumption and lower life cycle costs. Mixtures with 33% RAP and 10% cottonseed oil, and 33% RAP and 0.3% zeolite, demonstrated the highest cost savings and environmental performance improvements. The findings highlight that while the inclusion of additives increases some costs, the overall economic advantage of RAP utilization is substantial. This research underscores the feasibility of using recycled asphalt mixtures as a sustainable alternative to traditional mixtures, offering both economic and environmental benefits.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":"32 17","pages":"11269 - 11291"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-025-36362-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the economic and environmental advantages of using recycled asphalt mixtures with varying percentages of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP), cottonseed oil, and zeolite. The primary objective was to assess these mixtures’ life cycle impacts and costs compared to a traditional control mixture. The methodology employed includes Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost Assessment (LCCA), with a focus on endpoint impact categories such as ecosystem damage, human health, and resource availability. The analysis encompassed production, construction, and end-of-life phases, utilizing an 8.5% discount rate and a 10-year planning horizon. Results indicate that recycled asphalt mixtures with RAP and additives show significant environmental benefits, including reductions in impacts across all evaluated categories. Specifically, RAP incorporation led to substantial reductions in resource consumption and lower life cycle costs. Mixtures with 33% RAP and 10% cottonseed oil, and 33% RAP and 0.3% zeolite, demonstrated the highest cost savings and environmental performance improvements. The findings highlight that while the inclusion of additives increases some costs, the overall economic advantage of RAP utilization is substantial. This research underscores the feasibility of using recycled asphalt mixtures as a sustainable alternative to traditional mixtures, offering both economic and environmental benefits.

Graphical abstract

再生沥青混合料的经济和环境效益:再生沥青路面和添加剂在整个生命周期的影响
本研究探讨了使用不同比例的再生沥青路面(RAP)、棉籽油和沸石的再生沥青混合料的经济和环境优势。主要目的是与传统对照混合物相比,评估这些混合物的生命周期影响和成本。采用的方法包括生命周期评估(LCA)和生命周期成本评估(LCCA),重点关注端点影响类别,如生态系统损害、人类健康和资源可用性。分析包括生产、建设和寿命终止阶段,采用8.5%的贴现率和10年的规划期限。结果表明,含有RAP和添加剂的再生沥青混合料具有显著的环境效益,包括减少所有评估类别的影响。具体来说,RAP的结合导致了资源消耗的大幅减少和生命周期成本的降低。33% RAP和10%棉籽油的混合物,以及33% RAP和0.3%沸石的混合物,显示出最大的成本节约和环境性能改善。研究结果强调,虽然添加添加剂会增加一些成本,但RAP利用的总体经济优势是巨大的。这项研究强调了使用再生沥青混合料作为传统混合料的可持续替代品的可行性,提供了经济和环境效益。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信