The evolution of European cranial morphology: From the Upper Paleolithic to the Late Eneolithic steppe invasions

IF 2.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Pavel Grasgruber
{"title":"The evolution of European cranial morphology: From the Upper Paleolithic to the Late Eneolithic steppe invasions","authors":"Pavel Grasgruber","doi":"10.1007/s12520-025-02207-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this work was a comprehensive overview of the development of cranial morphology in prehistoric Europe, spanning the period from the Upper Paleolithic to the genetic turnovers associated with the Indo-European migrations from the East European steppes (~ 2000 cal. BC). A total of 103 prehistoric samples with &gt; 3900 male skulls were divided into six periods and statistically compared using 22 cranial values (11 raw craniometric measurements and 11 indices). This analysis shows that the Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic periods were characterized by a predominance of robust, broad-faced morphology that was changing only slowly over time. As late as after the onset of the Neolithic (6000 cal. BC) did morphological diversity increase in the form of the more gracile, narrow-faced crania of Anatolian farmers. The sharp contrast between these two morphotypes persisted throughout the Neolithic and Eneolithic (6000–3000 cal. BC), when the autochthonous European populations were gradually pushed into the peripheral regions of Northern and Eastern Europe. The most significant changes in the European cranial form occurred between 3000–2000 cal. BC, when East European steppe pastoralists stemming from the Jamnaja culture genetically overwhelmed farming groups in the rest of the continent. As a result of subsequent admixture and strong founder events, two very distinct, morphologically antagonistic populations emerged: The ultradolichocephalic associated with the Corded Ware culture and the brachycephalic associated with the Bell Beaker culture. In general, the ancient European morphologies predating 2000 cal. BC only partially overlap with the recent populations of Europe and are more diverse, which indicates a lack of continuity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12520-025-02207-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02207-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this work was a comprehensive overview of the development of cranial morphology in prehistoric Europe, spanning the period from the Upper Paleolithic to the genetic turnovers associated with the Indo-European migrations from the East European steppes (~ 2000 cal. BC). A total of 103 prehistoric samples with > 3900 male skulls were divided into six periods and statistically compared using 22 cranial values (11 raw craniometric measurements and 11 indices). This analysis shows that the Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic periods were characterized by a predominance of robust, broad-faced morphology that was changing only slowly over time. As late as after the onset of the Neolithic (6000 cal. BC) did morphological diversity increase in the form of the more gracile, narrow-faced crania of Anatolian farmers. The sharp contrast between these two morphotypes persisted throughout the Neolithic and Eneolithic (6000–3000 cal. BC), when the autochthonous European populations were gradually pushed into the peripheral regions of Northern and Eastern Europe. The most significant changes in the European cranial form occurred between 3000–2000 cal. BC, when East European steppe pastoralists stemming from the Jamnaja culture genetically overwhelmed farming groups in the rest of the continent. As a result of subsequent admixture and strong founder events, two very distinct, morphologically antagonistic populations emerged: The ultradolichocephalic associated with the Corded Ware culture and the brachycephalic associated with the Bell Beaker culture. In general, the ancient European morphologies predating 2000 cal. BC only partially overlap with the recent populations of Europe and are more diverse, which indicates a lack of continuity.

欧洲人颅骨形态的演变:从旧石器时代晚期到新石器时代晚期的草原入侵
这项工作的目的是全面概述史前欧洲颅骨形态的发展,从旧石器时代晚期到与来自东欧大草原的印欧人迁移相关的基因转换(约公元前2000 cal. BC)。共103个史前样本,3900个男性颅骨,分为6个时期,采用22个颅值(11个原始颅测量值和11个指数)进行统计比较。这一分析表明,旧石器时代晚期和中石器时代的特征是粗壮、宽脸的形态占主导地位,这种形态随着时间的推移而缓慢变化。直到新石器时代(公元前6000 cal. BC)开始之后,安纳托利亚农民的形态多样性才以更纤细、窄脸的颅骨形式增加。这两种形态之间的鲜明对比贯穿了新石器时代和新石器时代(公元前6000-3000 cal. BC),当时本土的欧洲人口逐渐被推向北欧和东欧的外围地区。欧洲人颅骨形态最显著的变化发生在公元前3000-2000 cal. BC之间,当时来自Jamnaja文化的东欧草原牧民在基因上压倒了欧洲大陆其他地区的农业群体。由于随后的混合和强大的创始人事件,出现了两个非常不同的,形态上对立的种群:与绳纹器文化相关的超多头畸形种群和与钟烧杯文化相关的短头畸形种群。总的来说,公元前2000年以前的古代欧洲人的形态与近代欧洲人只有部分重叠,而且更加多样化,这表明缺乏连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信