Machine learning-based prediction models for falls in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ronggui Xie , Le Shao , Jingru Pei , Yuyan Shi , Mingming Tang , Xueqin Sun , Guiyu Deng , Hong Zhao
{"title":"Machine learning-based prediction models for falls in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Ronggui Xie ,&nbsp;Le Shao ,&nbsp;Jingru Pei ,&nbsp;Yuyan Shi ,&nbsp;Mingming Tang ,&nbsp;Xueqin Sun ,&nbsp;Guiyu Deng ,&nbsp;Hong Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.gerinurse.2025.03.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically review published machine learning models aimed at predicting the risk of falls among hospitalized patients.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we comprehensively searched the database PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and The Cochrane library from inception through November 14, 2023. Data extraction followed the CHARMS checklist, and bias risk and applicability were assessed using the PROBAST tool. A meta-analysis was performed utilizing Meta-disc software, with the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity serving as the effect measures. Heterogeneity was assessed through the Chi-square test and I<sup>2</sup> test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A systematic search yielded a total of 2007 studies, 14 of which were selected following screening, and 13 of these studies were subjected to quantitative analyses. The incidence rate of inpatient falls ranged from 0.14 % to 50.69 %, with corresponding area under the curve (AUC) values varying between 0.57 and 0.99. Age, multiple drugs, emerged as the most frequently employed predictive factors. While the overall quality of the studies was considered satisfactory, a high risk of bias was identified, primarily attributed to insufficient reporting in the participant and analysis domains. The combined AUC of the 13 predictive models was 0.82, with a sensitivity of 0.69 (95 % CI [0.68-0.7]) and a specificity of 0.70 (95 % CI [0.70-0.71]), indicating robust discriminative performance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although machine learning models provide an emerging and promising method for predicting hospital falls, they require broader validation to ensure practical applicability. This review highlights the potential drawbacks of current methods, including high risk of bias and low reproducibility, and provides various recommendations on how to address these challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>Falls are a frequent and significant issue for patients in hospitals, often resulting in severe physical harm and longer hospital stays. This research offers a fresh approach and tool for medical professionals by thoroughly examining how machine learning models can predict falls, aiming to enhance personalized and precise fall risk management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56258,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Nursing","volume":"63 ","pages":"Pages 487-498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197457225001557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To systematically review published machine learning models aimed at predicting the risk of falls among hospitalized patients.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we comprehensively searched the database PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and The Cochrane library from inception through November 14, 2023. Data extraction followed the CHARMS checklist, and bias risk and applicability were assessed using the PROBAST tool. A meta-analysis was performed utilizing Meta-disc software, with the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity serving as the effect measures. Heterogeneity was assessed through the Chi-square test and I2 test.

Results

A systematic search yielded a total of 2007 studies, 14 of which were selected following screening, and 13 of these studies were subjected to quantitative analyses. The incidence rate of inpatient falls ranged from 0.14 % to 50.69 %, with corresponding area under the curve (AUC) values varying between 0.57 and 0.99. Age, multiple drugs, emerged as the most frequently employed predictive factors. While the overall quality of the studies was considered satisfactory, a high risk of bias was identified, primarily attributed to insufficient reporting in the participant and analysis domains. The combined AUC of the 13 predictive models was 0.82, with a sensitivity of 0.69 (95 % CI [0.68-0.7]) and a specificity of 0.70 (95 % CI [0.70-0.71]), indicating robust discriminative performance.

Conclusion

Although machine learning models provide an emerging and promising method for predicting hospital falls, they require broader validation to ensure practical applicability. This review highlights the potential drawbacks of current methods, including high risk of bias and low reproducibility, and provides various recommendations on how to address these challenges.

Clinical relevance

Falls are a frequent and significant issue for patients in hospitals, often resulting in severe physical harm and longer hospital stays. This research offers a fresh approach and tool for medical professionals by thoroughly examining how machine learning models can predict falls, aiming to enhance personalized and precise fall risk management.
基于机器学习的住院病人跌倒预测模型:系统回顾和荟萃分析
方法根据纳入和排除标准,我们全面检索了从开始到 2023 年 11 月 14 日的数据库 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆。数据提取遵循CHARMS核对表,并使用PROBAST工具评估偏倚风险和适用性。使用 Meta-disc 软件进行荟萃分析,以曲线下面积、灵敏度和特异性作为效果测量指标。通过卡方检验(Chi-square test)和I2检验(I2 test)对异质性进行了评估。住院病人跌倒的发生率从 0.14 % 到 50.69 % 不等,相应的曲线下面积 (AUC) 值从 0.57 到 0.99 不等。年龄和多种药物是最常用的预测因素。虽然研究的总体质量令人满意,但发现偏倚风险较高,主要原因是参与者和分析领域的报告不足。13 个预测模型的综合 AUC 为 0.82,灵敏度为 0.69(95 % CI [0.68-0.7]),特异度为 0.70(95 % CI [0.70-0.71]),显示出强大的判别性能。本综述强调了当前方法的潜在缺点,包括偏倚风险高和可重复性低,并就如何应对这些挑战提出了各种建议。这项研究通过深入研究机器学习模型如何预测跌倒,为医疗专业人员提供了一种全新的方法和工具,旨在加强个性化和精确的跌倒风险管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geriatric Nursing
Geriatric Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
257
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Nursing is a comprehensive source for clinical information and management advice relating to the care of older adults. The journal''s peer-reviewed articles report the latest developments in the management of acute and chronic disorders and provide practical advice on care of older adults across the long term continuum. Geriatric Nursing addresses current issues related to drugs, advance directives, staff development and management, legal issues, client and caregiver education, infection control, and other topics. The journal is written specifically for nurses and nurse practitioners who work with older adults in any care setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信