Exercise interventions for health outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorder: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of clinical trials

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Xiuyan Gao , Guangjun Xu , Ningning Fu , Lin Wang , Qi Ben , Mengchao Shen , Xiumei Bu
{"title":"Exercise interventions for health outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorder: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of clinical trials","authors":"Xiuyan Gao ,&nbsp;Guangjun Xu ,&nbsp;Ningning Fu ,&nbsp;Lin Wang ,&nbsp;Qi Ben ,&nbsp;Mengchao Shen ,&nbsp;Xiumei Bu","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Exercise interventions have gained widespread acceptance due to their cost-effectiveness, ease of implementation, and low incidence of negative effects. However, the overall effects of exercise interventions on the health outcomes of children with autism are not evaluated systematically. To evaluate the effect of exercise interventions on behavioral, motorial, and psychosocial health outcomes in autistic children, as well as to determine the quality of evidence for each outcome. We conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses investigating the associations between exercise interventions and health outcomes in autistic children from inception to November 27, 2024. Following exercise interventions, maladaptive behavior [standardized mean difference (SMD): −0.73; 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI): −0.71, −0.03] showed a substantial improvement. However, no discernible impact on stereotyped behavior (SMD: 0.09; 95 % CI: −0.30, 0.48) was observed. Sensitivity analysis revealed that all overall effect sizes indicated statistically significant differences, even though the reanalysis of meta-analyses showed no significant effectiveness of exercise interventions on social communication (SMD: −0.09; 95 % CI: −0.61, 0.43), social skill (SMD = −0.22; 95 % CI: −0.99, 0.54), social function (SMD = 2.64; 95 % CI: −0.10, 5.39), and motor skills (SMD: 0.71; 95 % CI: −0.97, 2.39). Exercise interventions are suggested to improve maladaptive behaviors and may help with social communication, social skills, social function, and motor skills. The evidence for the effectiveness of exercise interventions in reducing stereotyped behaviors is weak, but it still merits investigation. We need more carefully planned randomized controlled studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 106144"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425001447","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exercise interventions have gained widespread acceptance due to their cost-effectiveness, ease of implementation, and low incidence of negative effects. However, the overall effects of exercise interventions on the health outcomes of children with autism are not evaluated systematically. To evaluate the effect of exercise interventions on behavioral, motorial, and psychosocial health outcomes in autistic children, as well as to determine the quality of evidence for each outcome. We conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses investigating the associations between exercise interventions and health outcomes in autistic children from inception to November 27, 2024. Following exercise interventions, maladaptive behavior [standardized mean difference (SMD): −0.73; 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI): −0.71, −0.03] showed a substantial improvement. However, no discernible impact on stereotyped behavior (SMD: 0.09; 95 % CI: −0.30, 0.48) was observed. Sensitivity analysis revealed that all overall effect sizes indicated statistically significant differences, even though the reanalysis of meta-analyses showed no significant effectiveness of exercise interventions on social communication (SMD: −0.09; 95 % CI: −0.61, 0.43), social skill (SMD = −0.22; 95 % CI: −0.99, 0.54), social function (SMD = 2.64; 95 % CI: −0.10, 5.39), and motor skills (SMD: 0.71; 95 % CI: −0.97, 2.39). Exercise interventions are suggested to improve maladaptive behaviors and may help with social communication, social skills, social function, and motor skills. The evidence for the effectiveness of exercise interventions in reducing stereotyped behaviors is weak, but it still merits investigation. We need more carefully planned randomized controlled studies.
针对自闭症谱系障碍儿童健康状况的运动干预:临床试验荟萃分析综述
运动干预由于其成本效益,易于实施和低发生率的负面影响而获得了广泛的接受。然而,运动干预对自闭症儿童健康结果的总体影响尚未得到系统评估。评估运动干预对自闭症儿童行为、运动和心理健康结果的影响,并确定每种结果的证据质量。我们对从一开始到2024年11月27日自闭症儿童的运动干预和健康结果之间的关系进行了荟萃分析的综合回顾。运动干预后,适应不良行为[标准化平均差(SMD):−0.73;95 %置信区间(95 % CI):−0.71,−0.03)显示有明显改善。然而,对刻板行为没有明显的影响(SMD: 0.09;95 % CI:−0.30,0.48)。敏感性分析显示,尽管meta分析的再分析显示运动干预对社会沟通没有显著效果(SMD: - 0.09;95 % CI: - 0.61, 0.43),社交技能(SMD = - 0.22;95 % CI:−0.99,0.54),社会功能(SMD = 2.64;95 % CI:−0.10,5.39)和运动技能(SMD: 0.71;95 % ci:−0.97,2.39)。运动干预被建议改善适应不良行为,并可能有助于社会沟通、社会技能、社会功能和运动技能。运动干预在减少刻板行为方面的有效性证据不足,但仍值得研究。我们需要更多精心策划的随机对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信