Dissociating sensory and decision processes in tasting: Intensity affects sensitivity, while expectancies and feedback interact, affecting decision criteria
Manuel M. Ramos-Álvarez, Teresa L. Martín-Guerrero, Juan M. Rosas
{"title":"Dissociating sensory and decision processes in tasting: Intensity affects sensitivity, while expectancies and feedback interact, affecting decision criteria","authors":"Manuel M. Ramos-Álvarez, Teresa L. Martín-Guerrero, Juan M. Rosas","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this study was to examine the influence of feedback on the dynamics of sensory and decision processes in a tasting task involving mixtures of salty and sour basic tastes. The Double Dissociation Additive Test within the Signal Detection Theory framework was applied to assess the effects of manipulating intensity, signal-noise base rates, and feedback on sensitivity and decision-making processes. Participants' discrimination improved as salt concentration increased, regardless of induced bias or feedback presence; however, feedback led to a general increase in sensitivity. Both signal-noise stimulus base rates and feedback influenced the decision-making process. When feedback was present, detection judgments aligned more closely with actual signal-noise stimulus base rates. However, in the absence of feedback, the relationship between base rates and response bias reversed. Implications for research in sensory evaluation and perceptual learning are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 105552"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325001272","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the influence of feedback on the dynamics of sensory and decision processes in a tasting task involving mixtures of salty and sour basic tastes. The Double Dissociation Additive Test within the Signal Detection Theory framework was applied to assess the effects of manipulating intensity, signal-noise base rates, and feedback on sensitivity and decision-making processes. Participants' discrimination improved as salt concentration increased, regardless of induced bias or feedback presence; however, feedback led to a general increase in sensitivity. Both signal-noise stimulus base rates and feedback influenced the decision-making process. When feedback was present, detection judgments aligned more closely with actual signal-noise stimulus base rates. However, in the absence of feedback, the relationship between base rates and response bias reversed. Implications for research in sensory evaluation and perceptual learning are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.