Assessing the community knowledge on waste management practices, drinking water source systems, and the possible implications on public health systems

Joseph Omeiza Alao , Oche Joseph Otorkpa , Daniel A. Ayejoto , Ahmed M. Saqr
{"title":"Assessing the community knowledge on waste management practices, drinking water source systems, and the possible implications on public health systems","authors":"Joseph Omeiza Alao ,&nbsp;Oche Joseph Otorkpa ,&nbsp;Daniel A. Ayejoto ,&nbsp;Ahmed M. Saqr","doi":"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Assessing the waste management practices and drinking water source systems is essential for public health systems and the well-being of millions. However, inadequate integration of community knowledge into scientific research to effectively address environmental issues remains a great challenge. This study assessed the community knowledge on the prevalent waste management practices, drinking water source systems, and the potential associated health risks using a descriptive cross-sectional design utilizing diagnostic survey questionnaires (DSQs) and oral interviews (OIs) in villages, semi-urban, and urban areas. The study reveals that 92 % of villagers rely on potentially contaminated water sources, with 43 % drinking from open surface water and 49 % from hand-dug wells. Meanwhile, open defecation remains prevalent, with 52 % of villagers resorting to this practice. The situation worsens in urban areas, where 56 % of residents dispose of waste in open dumpsites/landfills, with no access to engineered landfills. Waste burning, a hazardous practice, is employed by 27 % of the population. The data show that 17 % of the population relies on surface water, 40 % on hand-dug wells, and 36 % on boreholes, with only 5.7 % accessing treated water. 56 % of waste is disposed of in open dumpsites/landfills, 27 % is burned, 9 % is indiscriminately dumped, and 7 % is dumped in water bodies. 18 % of the population defecates openly, 30 % use pit latrines, and 55 % rely on untreated water systems for defecation. This implies that combining community knowledge with scientific research to address environmental challenges is crucial. However, the attitude of the respondents towards waste management, drinking water sources and health risks accounts for a significant variation in respondents’ education. Effective implementation of waste management practices and provision of basic sewage infrastructural systems, coupled with adequate education, is required to protect drinking water sources, prevent pandemic diseases, and safeguard the national economy and health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100256,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Waste Systems","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Waste Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525000934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing the waste management practices and drinking water source systems is essential for public health systems and the well-being of millions. However, inadequate integration of community knowledge into scientific research to effectively address environmental issues remains a great challenge. This study assessed the community knowledge on the prevalent waste management practices, drinking water source systems, and the potential associated health risks using a descriptive cross-sectional design utilizing diagnostic survey questionnaires (DSQs) and oral interviews (OIs) in villages, semi-urban, and urban areas. The study reveals that 92 % of villagers rely on potentially contaminated water sources, with 43 % drinking from open surface water and 49 % from hand-dug wells. Meanwhile, open defecation remains prevalent, with 52 % of villagers resorting to this practice. The situation worsens in urban areas, where 56 % of residents dispose of waste in open dumpsites/landfills, with no access to engineered landfills. Waste burning, a hazardous practice, is employed by 27 % of the population. The data show that 17 % of the population relies on surface water, 40 % on hand-dug wells, and 36 % on boreholes, with only 5.7 % accessing treated water. 56 % of waste is disposed of in open dumpsites/landfills, 27 % is burned, 9 % is indiscriminately dumped, and 7 % is dumped in water bodies. 18 % of the population defecates openly, 30 % use pit latrines, and 55 % rely on untreated water systems for defecation. This implies that combining community knowledge with scientific research to address environmental challenges is crucial. However, the attitude of the respondents towards waste management, drinking water sources and health risks accounts for a significant variation in respondents’ education. Effective implementation of waste management practices and provision of basic sewage infrastructural systems, coupled with adequate education, is required to protect drinking water sources, prevent pandemic diseases, and safeguard the national economy and health.
评估社区对废物管理做法、饮用水源系统以及对公共卫生系统可能产生的影响的认识
评估废物管理做法和饮用水源系统对公共卫生系统和数百万人的福祉至关重要。然而,将社区知识整合到科学研究中以有效解决环境问题仍然是一个巨大的挑战。本研究采用描述性横断面设计,利用诊断性调查问卷(DSQs)和口头访谈(oi),在村庄、半城市和城市地区评估了社区对普遍的废物管理做法、饮用水水源系统和潜在相关健康风险的了解。研究表明,92% %的村民依赖可能受到污染的水源,其中43% %的村民饮用露天地表水,49% %的村民饮用手挖井。与此同时,露天排便仍然很普遍,52% %的村民采取这种做法。城市地区的情况更糟,56% %的居民在露天垃圾场/垃圾填埋场处置废物,无法进入工程垃圾填埋场。焚烧废物是一种危险的做法,27% %的人口采用这种做法。数据显示,17% %的人口依赖地表水,40% %依赖手挖井,36% %依赖钻孔,只有5.7% %的人口获得处理过的水。56% %的废物被弃置在露天垃圾场/堆填区,27% %被焚烧,9% %被随意倾倒,7% %被倾倒在水体中。18% %的人口露天排便,30% %的人口使用坑式厕所,55% %的人口依靠未经处理的水系统排便。这意味着将社区知识与科学研究结合起来解决环境挑战是至关重要的。然而,应答者对废物管理、饮用水源和健康风险的态度造成应答者受教育程度的显著差异。必须有效执行废物管理做法,提供基本的污水处理基础设施系统,并辅以适当的教育,以保护饮用水源,预防大流行病,并保障国民经济和健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信