Long in the tooth for creativity? Differences in divergent thinking between young and older adults

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Vicente Alfonso-Benlliure, Irene Checa, Juan C. Meléndez
{"title":"Long in the tooth for creativity? Differences in divergent thinking between young and older adults","authors":"Vicente Alfonso-Benlliure,&nbsp;Irene Checa,&nbsp;Juan C. Meléndez","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Young and older adults require creative skills in their daily lives to solve problems professionally and personally. The capacity for creative thinking is influenced by various changes that occur throughout the life cycle. The objectives of this study include testing the measurement invariance of the PIC-A test and exploring whether significant differences in creative thinking exist between young and older adults. 210 young adults and 131 older adults participated in the study (341 subjects in total). First, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted with the full sample, followed by CFAs for each age subgroup. Subsequently, a multi-group of measurement invariance routine was tested with configural, metric and scalar invariance. The 2-factor CFA model for the full sample showed adequate fit (χ2=42.537; df =13; <em>p</em>&lt;.001, CFI =0.967; RMSEA = 0.082 [.055–0.109]; SRMR = 0.050) although the Graphic Originality test did not exhibit a significant loading on the Graphic Creativity Factor and was not removed from the model for consistency with the original scale. The model fit indices for the young adult and older adult groups were acceptable. Results showed age-related differences in both narrative and graphic creativity, with higher scores in the young adult group. Finally, the study provides hypothetical explanations for differences in divergent thinking performance in light of theories such as inhibition, assimilationaccommodation, and socioemotional theory. For example, the role of potential distractors, the old adults reduced tendency to take risks, or their preference for practical and emotionally satisfying responses when solving problems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101847"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125000963","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Young and older adults require creative skills in their daily lives to solve problems professionally and personally. The capacity for creative thinking is influenced by various changes that occur throughout the life cycle. The objectives of this study include testing the measurement invariance of the PIC-A test and exploring whether significant differences in creative thinking exist between young and older adults. 210 young adults and 131 older adults participated in the study (341 subjects in total). First, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted with the full sample, followed by CFAs for each age subgroup. Subsequently, a multi-group of measurement invariance routine was tested with configural, metric and scalar invariance. The 2-factor CFA model for the full sample showed adequate fit (χ2=42.537; df =13; p<.001, CFI =0.967; RMSEA = 0.082 [.055–0.109]; SRMR = 0.050) although the Graphic Originality test did not exhibit a significant loading on the Graphic Creativity Factor and was not removed from the model for consistency with the original scale. The model fit indices for the young adult and older adult groups were acceptable. Results showed age-related differences in both narrative and graphic creativity, with higher scores in the young adult group. Finally, the study provides hypothetical explanations for differences in divergent thinking performance in light of theories such as inhibition, assimilationaccommodation, and socioemotional theory. For example, the role of potential distractors, the old adults reduced tendency to take risks, or their preference for practical and emotionally satisfying responses when solving problems.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信