Pamela I. Chacon , Richard Guilbeau , Gary Potten , James Strawn
{"title":"Improved method for sample mixing, handling and analysis in high water cut samples","authors":"Pamela I. Chacon , Richard Guilbeau , Gary Potten , James Strawn","doi":"10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2025.102912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Operating production facilites in mature fields globally pose both measurement challenges and opportunities. When production depletes, facility operations may transition from three-phase to two-phase production separation resulting in allocation measurement of oil and water mixtures.</div><div>There are two common approaches used for production allocation measurement to determine water cut: online water cut analyzers (WCA) and sampling.Sampling can be spot or automatic, with automatic sampling preferred for custody applications when water content is less than 5 % by volume. Spot sampling is the common method used for field verifying WCA. The most common technique for determining water content in a sample is by centrifuge; however, the centrifuge methods lack published reproducibility and repeatability data at high water cuts (>5 % water in oil by volume). Sample handling and mixing with high water concentrations are also a severe challenge, especially with light oils and products which don't mix well. As WCAs are used more and more in high water cut production allocation, an accurate methodology for verifying the instruments is required for broad industry acceptance but the current industry guidance is very limited.</div><div>This paper describes an improved method for sample handling, and mixing and describes the proof of concept of using existing methods for analysis of high water cut samples for production allocation measurement developed in support of WCA verification. The testing described in this paper used water cuts 15–95 % by volume, and three hydrocarbons: two crudes and one distillate oil. The data demonstrates the range of the standard methods (API 10.3 and API 10.4) could be expanded while meeting or exceeding the current reproducibility requirements of API MPMS Ch 8 and Ch 10.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50440,"journal":{"name":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 102912"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955598625001049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Operating production facilites in mature fields globally pose both measurement challenges and opportunities. When production depletes, facility operations may transition from three-phase to two-phase production separation resulting in allocation measurement of oil and water mixtures.
There are two common approaches used for production allocation measurement to determine water cut: online water cut analyzers (WCA) and sampling.Sampling can be spot or automatic, with automatic sampling preferred for custody applications when water content is less than 5 % by volume. Spot sampling is the common method used for field verifying WCA. The most common technique for determining water content in a sample is by centrifuge; however, the centrifuge methods lack published reproducibility and repeatability data at high water cuts (>5 % water in oil by volume). Sample handling and mixing with high water concentrations are also a severe challenge, especially with light oils and products which don't mix well. As WCAs are used more and more in high water cut production allocation, an accurate methodology for verifying the instruments is required for broad industry acceptance but the current industry guidance is very limited.
This paper describes an improved method for sample handling, and mixing and describes the proof of concept of using existing methods for analysis of high water cut samples for production allocation measurement developed in support of WCA verification. The testing described in this paper used water cuts 15–95 % by volume, and three hydrocarbons: two crudes and one distillate oil. The data demonstrates the range of the standard methods (API 10.3 and API 10.4) could be expanded while meeting or exceeding the current reproducibility requirements of API MPMS Ch 8 and Ch 10.
期刊介绍:
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation is dedicated to disseminating the latest research results on all aspects of flow measurement, in both closed conduits and open channels. The design of flow measurement systems involves a wide variety of multidisciplinary activities including modelling the flow sensor, the fluid flow and the sensor/fluid interactions through the use of computation techniques; the development of advanced transducer systems and their associated signal processing and the laboratory and field assessment of the overall system under ideal and disturbed conditions.
FMI is the essential forum for critical information exchange, and contributions are particularly encouraged in the following areas of interest:
Modelling: the application of mathematical and computational modelling to the interaction of fluid dynamics with flowmeters, including flowmeter behaviour, improved flowmeter design and installation problems. Application of CAD/CAE techniques to flowmeter modelling are eligible.
Design and development: the detailed design of the flowmeter head and/or signal processing aspects of novel flowmeters. Emphasis is given to papers identifying new sensor configurations, multisensor flow measurement systems, non-intrusive flow metering techniques and the application of microelectronic techniques in smart or intelligent systems.
Calibration techniques: including descriptions of new or existing calibration facilities and techniques, calibration data from different flowmeter types, and calibration intercomparison data from different laboratories.
Installation effect data: dealing with the effects of non-ideal flow conditions on flowmeters. Papers combining a theoretical understanding of flowmeter behaviour with experimental work are particularly welcome.