Nabih Nakrour , Rory L. Cochran , Nathaniel David Mercaldo , William Bradley , Leo L. Tsai , Priyanka Prajapati , Robert Grimm , Heinrich von Busch , Wei-Ching Lo , Mukesh G. Harisinghani
{"title":"Impact of artificial intelligence assisted lesion detection on radiologists' interpretation at multiparametric prostate MRI","authors":"Nabih Nakrour , Rory L. Cochran , Nathaniel David Mercaldo , William Bradley , Leo L. Tsai , Priyanka Prajapati , Robert Grimm , Heinrich von Busch , Wei-Ching Lo , Mukesh G. Harisinghani","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare prostate cancer lesion detection using conventional and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted image interpretation at multiparametric MRI (mpMRI).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study of 53 consecutive patients who underwent prostate mpMRI and subsequent prostate tissue sampling was performed. Two board-certified radiologists (with 4 and 12 years of experience) blinded to the clinical information interpreted anonymized exams using the PI-RADS v2.1 framework without and with an AI-assistance tool. The AI software tool provided radiologists with gland segmentation and automated lesion detection assigning a probability score for the likelihood of the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The reference standard for all cases was the prostate pathology from systematic and targeted biopsies. Statistical analyses assessed interrater agreement and compared diagnostic performances with and without AI assistance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Within the entire cohort, 42 patients (79 %) harbored Gleason-positive disease, with 25 patients (47 %) having csPCa. Radiologists' diagnostic performance for csPCa was significantly improved over conventional interpretation with AI assistance (reader A: AUC 0.82 vs. 0.72, <em>p</em> = 0.03; reader B: AUC 0.78 vs. 0.69, p = 0.03). Without AI assistance, 81 % (<em>n</em> = 36; 95 % CI: 0.89–0.91) of the lesions were scored similarly by radiologists for lesion-level characteristics, and with AI assistance, 59 % (26, 0.82–0.89) of the lesions were scored similarly. For reader A, there was a significant difference in PI-RADS scores (<em>p</em> = 0.02) between AI-assisted and non-assisted assessments. Signficant differences were not detected for reader B.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>AI-assisted prostate mMRI interpretation improved radiologist diagnostic performance over conventional interpretation independent of reader experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 110484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125000841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To compare prostate cancer lesion detection using conventional and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted image interpretation at multiparametric MRI (mpMRI).
Materials and methods
A retrospective study of 53 consecutive patients who underwent prostate mpMRI and subsequent prostate tissue sampling was performed. Two board-certified radiologists (with 4 and 12 years of experience) blinded to the clinical information interpreted anonymized exams using the PI-RADS v2.1 framework without and with an AI-assistance tool. The AI software tool provided radiologists with gland segmentation and automated lesion detection assigning a probability score for the likelihood of the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The reference standard for all cases was the prostate pathology from systematic and targeted biopsies. Statistical analyses assessed interrater agreement and compared diagnostic performances with and without AI assistance.
Results
Within the entire cohort, 42 patients (79 %) harbored Gleason-positive disease, with 25 patients (47 %) having csPCa. Radiologists' diagnostic performance for csPCa was significantly improved over conventional interpretation with AI assistance (reader A: AUC 0.82 vs. 0.72, p = 0.03; reader B: AUC 0.78 vs. 0.69, p = 0.03). Without AI assistance, 81 % (n = 36; 95 % CI: 0.89–0.91) of the lesions were scored similarly by radiologists for lesion-level characteristics, and with AI assistance, 59 % (26, 0.82–0.89) of the lesions were scored similarly. For reader A, there was a significant difference in PI-RADS scores (p = 0.02) between AI-assisted and non-assisted assessments. Signficant differences were not detected for reader B.
Conclusion
AI-assisted prostate mMRI interpretation improved radiologist diagnostic performance over conventional interpretation independent of reader experience.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology