Global connectivity and resilience in African Banking: Role of technology and regulation

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Minyahil Alemu , Jayamohan M.K. , Wondaferahu Mulugeta
{"title":"Global connectivity and resilience in African Banking: Role of technology and regulation","authors":"Minyahil Alemu ,&nbsp;Jayamohan M.K. ,&nbsp;Wondaferahu Mulugeta","doi":"10.1016/j.resglo.2025.100285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study emphasizes three solid questions: (i) the extent to which African banking systems are globalized; (ii) the role of regulation and technology in this process; and (iii) whether economic globalization reinforces banking stability. We conceptualize financial globalization through two symbiotic dimensions; connectivity and resilience, both affected by technological and regulatory designs. Covering 21 African nations and five major global economies, we employ comovement analysis (2000–2023), generalized impulse response functions, and System-GMM (2010–2023). We found strong comovement between African and global banks, especially during the 2007/08 global financial crisis, followed by partial decoupling in its aftermath. Yet, African banks tend to be highly reactive to world liquidity conditions. Financial technology has a dual role: automated teller machine proliferation fosters cross-border activity, whereas mobile banking, though active for domestic inclusion, did less as a global connector due to infrastructural and regulatory curbs. Regulatory capital cushions, chiefly Tier 1 ratios, favor both stability and integration by lowering risk and refining solvency. Trade openness, one facet of economic globalization, also upholds banking stability through greater risk diversification. We suggest adaptive regulatory approaches, like sandbox outlines, and especial support for smaller African banks, for more inclusive and sustainable integration into global financial markets. Future research must expand on regulatory on scope to capture institutional asymmetry and incipient risks within Africa’s finance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34321,"journal":{"name":"Research in Globalization","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Globalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590051X25000188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study emphasizes three solid questions: (i) the extent to which African banking systems are globalized; (ii) the role of regulation and technology in this process; and (iii) whether economic globalization reinforces banking stability. We conceptualize financial globalization through two symbiotic dimensions; connectivity and resilience, both affected by technological and regulatory designs. Covering 21 African nations and five major global economies, we employ comovement analysis (2000–2023), generalized impulse response functions, and System-GMM (2010–2023). We found strong comovement between African and global banks, especially during the 2007/08 global financial crisis, followed by partial decoupling in its aftermath. Yet, African banks tend to be highly reactive to world liquidity conditions. Financial technology has a dual role: automated teller machine proliferation fosters cross-border activity, whereas mobile banking, though active for domestic inclusion, did less as a global connector due to infrastructural and regulatory curbs. Regulatory capital cushions, chiefly Tier 1 ratios, favor both stability and integration by lowering risk and refining solvency. Trade openness, one facet of economic globalization, also upholds banking stability through greater risk diversification. We suggest adaptive regulatory approaches, like sandbox outlines, and especial support for smaller African banks, for more inclusive and sustainable integration into global financial markets. Future research must expand on regulatory on scope to capture institutional asymmetry and incipient risks within Africa’s finance.
非洲银行业的全球连通性和弹性:技术和监管的作用
这项研究强调了三个坚实的问题:(i)非洲银行体系全球化的程度;(ii)监管和技术在这一过程中的作用;(三)经济全球化是否加强了银行业的稳定性。我们通过两个共生维度来概念化金融全球化;连通性和弹性都受到技术和监管设计的影响。在21个非洲国家和5个主要的全球经济体中,我们采用了共动分析(2000-2023)、广义脉冲响应函数和System-GMM(2010-2023)。我们发现,非洲银行与全球银行之间存在强烈的趋同,尤其是在2007/08年全球金融危机期间,随后在其后果中出现部分脱钩。然而,非洲银行往往对全球流动性状况反应强烈。金融技术具有双重作用:自动柜员机的普及促进了跨境活动,而移动银行虽然对国内包容性很积极,但由于基础设施和监管限制,它在全球连接方面的作用不大。监管资本缓冲,主要是一级资本充足率,通过降低风险和改善偿付能力,有利于稳定和整合。贸易开放是经济全球化的一个方面,也有助于分散风险,维护银行业稳定。我们建议采用适应性监管方法,如沙盒框架,并特别支持非洲小型银行,以更加包容和可持续地融入全球金融市场。未来的研究必须扩大监管范围,以捕捉非洲金融中的制度不对称和早期风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Globalization
Research in Globalization Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
79 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信