An Interpretable Predictive Model for Liquid Holdup of Hilly Terrain Oil-Gas Pipelines Based on Machine Learning and Shapley Additive Explanations

IF 3.7 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xinhui Chen, Si Huang*, Tianri Guan and Hao Fu, 
{"title":"An Interpretable Predictive Model for Liquid Holdup of Hilly Terrain Oil-Gas Pipelines Based on Machine Learning and Shapley Additive Explanations","authors":"Xinhui Chen,&nbsp;Si Huang*,&nbsp;Tianri Guan and Hao Fu,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.4c1087410.1021/acsomega.4c10874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >During oil and gas field development, hilly terrain pipelines for mixed oil and gas transportation often face challenges from liquid loading, which significantly impacts flow assurance. However, the intricate nonlinear relationship between liquid loading and pipeline system operations complicates the solution of liquid holdup in practical pipelines by using traditional mechanistic models. Research combining machine learning (ML) for liquid loading prediction is limited, and most studies focus solely on validating the accuracy and efficiency of ML models without addressing their interpretability. To address this issue, an interpretable predictive model integrating ML and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) is proposed. Operating conditions for an actual hilly terrain oil-gas pipeline were simulated using OLGA software to generate a comprehensive data set. Six ML models were compared using four evaluation metrics to assess their predictive performance for liquid holdup. eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) demonstrated the best performance, with an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.986, MAE of 0.012, MAPE of 0.030, and RMSE of 0.016 on the test set. The XGBoost model was then visualized using SHAP to provide interpretability. Specifically, global explanations were given to ascertain the contribution of individual features to the average liquid holdup in low-lying areas of the pipeline. Local explanations were also conducted for individual pipeline operation data samples, visualizing the influence of each feature on the average liquid holdup within any specific sample alongside their cumulative effects. The interactions among the features were analyzed to derive trends in the interaction effects of different pipelines and operating conditions on the average liquid holdup over different ranges.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 15","pages":"15160–15171 15160–15171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c10874","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c10874","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During oil and gas field development, hilly terrain pipelines for mixed oil and gas transportation often face challenges from liquid loading, which significantly impacts flow assurance. However, the intricate nonlinear relationship between liquid loading and pipeline system operations complicates the solution of liquid holdup in practical pipelines by using traditional mechanistic models. Research combining machine learning (ML) for liquid loading prediction is limited, and most studies focus solely on validating the accuracy and efficiency of ML models without addressing their interpretability. To address this issue, an interpretable predictive model integrating ML and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) is proposed. Operating conditions for an actual hilly terrain oil-gas pipeline were simulated using OLGA software to generate a comprehensive data set. Six ML models were compared using four evaluation metrics to assess their predictive performance for liquid holdup. eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) demonstrated the best performance, with an R2 of 0.986, MAE of 0.012, MAPE of 0.030, and RMSE of 0.016 on the test set. The XGBoost model was then visualized using SHAP to provide interpretability. Specifically, global explanations were given to ascertain the contribution of individual features to the average liquid holdup in low-lying areas of the pipeline. Local explanations were also conducted for individual pipeline operation data samples, visualizing the influence of each feature on the average liquid holdup within any specific sample alongside their cumulative effects. The interactions among the features were analyzed to derive trends in the interaction effects of different pipelines and operating conditions on the average liquid holdup over different ranges.

基于机器学习和Shapley加性解释的丘陵地形油气管道含液率可解释预测模型
在油气田开发过程中,丘陵地形油气混合输送管道经常面临液体载荷的挑战,严重影响了管道的流动保障。然而,液体载荷与管道系统运行之间复杂的非线性关系使传统的力学模型在实际管道中求解液含率变得复杂。结合机器学习(ML)进行液体负荷预测的研究是有限的,大多数研究只关注于验证ML模型的准确性和效率,而没有解决其可解释性问题。为了解决这一问题,提出了一种集成ML和Shapley加性解释(SHAP)的可解释预测模型。利用OLGA软件对实际丘陵地形油气管道的运行工况进行了仿真,得到了较为完整的数据集。使用四种评估指标对六种ML模型进行比较,以评估其对液含率的预测性能。极限梯度增强(eXtreme Gradient Boosting, XGBoost)的效果最好,在测试集上的R2为0.986,MAE为0.012,MAPE为0.030,RMSE为0.016。然后使用SHAP对XGBoost模型进行可视化,以提供可解释性。具体来说,给出了全局解释,以确定各个特征对管道低洼地区平均含液率的贡献。还对单个管道运行数据样本进行了局部解释,将每个特征对任何特定样本中平均液含率的影响及其累积效应可视化。分析了各特征之间的相互作用,得出了不同管道和操作条件对不同范围内平均含液率的相互作用影响趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信