Plastic design for knee braced steel frame using performance and mechanism control

IF 6.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Yanjing Fan, Shaoping Wan, Jianrong Pan, Zhaoqi Xie
{"title":"Plastic design for knee braced steel frame using performance and mechanism control","authors":"Yanjing Fan, Shaoping Wan, Jianrong Pan, Zhaoqi Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The knee braced steel frame (KBSF) has seen widespread application in practical engineering due to its minimal spatial requirements and ease of assembly. However, the absence of key research findings regarding the synergistic between knee braces and joints has hindered the accurate calculation of the stress state in structural components. This limitation makes a challenge for the better seismic performance of structures designed using current methodologies. This paper proposed a new design method, referred to as the Plastic Design using Performance and Mechanism Control (PDPMC), for knee braced steel frames, which could control the yield sequence of structural components, ultimately enhancing the seismic performance of the structure. Additionally, a keen braced steel frame was designed using the proposed methodology and subsequently compared with the conventional method known as Performance-Based Plastic Design (PBPD) and Theory of Plastic Mechanism Control (TPMC) to assess its accuracy. The results shows that the designed structure using the PDPMC method will utilize 20.9 % and 21.6 % less steel compared to the PBPD and TPMC methods, respectively. Moreover, the structure designed using the proposed methods exhibits excellent seismic performance. Specifically, the maximum inter-story drift ratios at top-floor drift ratios of 2 % and 4 % are comparable to those designed using PBPD and are 17 % lower than those designed using TPMC. The results of the nonlinear dynamic time-history analysis conducted on structures designed using three different methodologies indicate that all design methods satisfied with the safety requirements under various seismic ground motions. It should be noted that the structures designed using the proposed method demonstrate superior control over maximum displacement and inter-story drift angles compared to those designed with the TPMC, while exhibiting performance comparable to that of structures designed using the PBPD.","PeriodicalId":15064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of building engineering","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of building engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The knee braced steel frame (KBSF) has seen widespread application in practical engineering due to its minimal spatial requirements and ease of assembly. However, the absence of key research findings regarding the synergistic between knee braces and joints has hindered the accurate calculation of the stress state in structural components. This limitation makes a challenge for the better seismic performance of structures designed using current methodologies. This paper proposed a new design method, referred to as the Plastic Design using Performance and Mechanism Control (PDPMC), for knee braced steel frames, which could control the yield sequence of structural components, ultimately enhancing the seismic performance of the structure. Additionally, a keen braced steel frame was designed using the proposed methodology and subsequently compared with the conventional method known as Performance-Based Plastic Design (PBPD) and Theory of Plastic Mechanism Control (TPMC) to assess its accuracy. The results shows that the designed structure using the PDPMC method will utilize 20.9 % and 21.6 % less steel compared to the PBPD and TPMC methods, respectively. Moreover, the structure designed using the proposed methods exhibits excellent seismic performance. Specifically, the maximum inter-story drift ratios at top-floor drift ratios of 2 % and 4 % are comparable to those designed using PBPD and are 17 % lower than those designed using TPMC. The results of the nonlinear dynamic time-history analysis conducted on structures designed using three different methodologies indicate that all design methods satisfied with the safety requirements under various seismic ground motions. It should be noted that the structures designed using the proposed method demonstrate superior control over maximum displacement and inter-story drift angles compared to those designed with the TPMC, while exhibiting performance comparable to that of structures designed using the PBPD.
膝支撑钢框架的塑性设计采用性能和机构控制
膝支撑钢框架(KBSF)由于其最小的空间要求和易于组装,在实际工程中得到了广泛的应用。然而,膝关节支架与关节之间的协同作用缺乏重要的研究成果,阻碍了结构构件应力状态的准确计算。这一限制对采用现有方法设计结构的抗震性能提出了挑战。本文提出了一种基于性能与机制控制的塑性设计(PDPMC)的膝支撑钢框架设计新方法,该方法可以控制结构构件的屈服顺序,从而提高结构的抗震性能。此外,使用所提出的方法设计了一个灵敏支撑钢框架,并随后与传统的基于性能的塑性设计(PBPD)和塑性机理控制理论(TPMC)方法进行了比较,以评估其准确性。结果表明,与PBPD和TPMC方法相比,采用PDPMC方法设计的结构的钢材用量分别减少20.9%和21.6%。此外,采用该方法设计的结构具有良好的抗震性能。具体来说,顶楼漂移比为2%和4%时的最大层间漂移比与使用PBPD设计的结果相当,比使用TPMC设计的结果低17%。采用三种设计方法对结构进行了非线性动力时程分析,结果表明,三种设计方法均能满足不同地震动作用下的安全要求。值得注意的是,与使用TPMC设计的结构相比,使用该方法设计的结构对最大位移和层间漂移角的控制优于使用TPMC设计的结构,而其性能与使用PBPD设计的结构相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of building engineering
Journal of building engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1901
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Building Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of science and technology concerned with the whole life cycle of the built environment; from the design phase through to construction, operation, performance, maintenance and its deterioration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信