Social Role Violations in a Greedy Institution: Gender, Spouses' Military Status, and Servicemembers’ Marital Problems

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Erika L. King, Elissa M. Hack, Graeme C. Bicknell, Brynn N. Crownover, Mark A. Oliver
{"title":"Social Role Violations in a Greedy Institution: Gender, Spouses' Military Status, and Servicemembers’ Marital Problems","authors":"Erika L. King, Elissa M. Hack, Graeme C. Bicknell, Brynn N. Crownover, Mark A. Oliver","doi":"10.1007/s11199-025-01585-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to social role expectations, individuals who work in “gender atypical” occupations (i.e., occupations primarily comprised of workers of a different gender) often face unique job strains that may impede healthy intimate relationships (Yu &amp; Kuo, 2021). At the same time, “greedy institutions” (i.e., those that expect total commitment from members, e.g., family, the military), demand members’ full commitment and may increase risk for marital problems. Women’s higher marriage rates to fellow strained professionals likely also contribute to work/family tension (Yu &amp; Kuo, 2021). Still, little is known about how one’s gender and their spouse’s career are associated with specific marital problems in gender atypical, greedy institutions like the military. This study utilized the United States Air Force Community Feedback Tool (<i>N</i> = 28,745) to examine rates of and associations between gender, spouse military status, and types of marital problems endorsed by active-duty members (e.g., communication, divorce, abuse, living apart). Rate comparisons revealed that servicewomen endorsed higher rates of all types of marital problems than servicemen. After controlling for potential confounding variables, spouse military status moderated the relationship between gender and two problems likely exacerbated in greedy military institutions: changing roles and living apart. This finding suggests that servicewomen are bearing more marital burden overall, and only when men’s spouses serve do they experience similar marital problems. Results indicate that human resource policies and leadership practices are warranted that support dual-military/career couples (e.g., reducing unnecessary moves, providing targeted transitional assistance) as well as preventative and clinical interventions to mitigate severe problems disproportionately faced by women (e.g., community efforts to identify and mitigate risks of abuse and divorce).</p>","PeriodicalId":48425,"journal":{"name":"Sex Roles","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sex Roles","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-025-01585-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to social role expectations, individuals who work in “gender atypical” occupations (i.e., occupations primarily comprised of workers of a different gender) often face unique job strains that may impede healthy intimate relationships (Yu & Kuo, 2021). At the same time, “greedy institutions” (i.e., those that expect total commitment from members, e.g., family, the military), demand members’ full commitment and may increase risk for marital problems. Women’s higher marriage rates to fellow strained professionals likely also contribute to work/family tension (Yu & Kuo, 2021). Still, little is known about how one’s gender and their spouse’s career are associated with specific marital problems in gender atypical, greedy institutions like the military. This study utilized the United States Air Force Community Feedback Tool (N = 28,745) to examine rates of and associations between gender, spouse military status, and types of marital problems endorsed by active-duty members (e.g., communication, divorce, abuse, living apart). Rate comparisons revealed that servicewomen endorsed higher rates of all types of marital problems than servicemen. After controlling for potential confounding variables, spouse military status moderated the relationship between gender and two problems likely exacerbated in greedy military institutions: changing roles and living apart. This finding suggests that servicewomen are bearing more marital burden overall, and only when men’s spouses serve do they experience similar marital problems. Results indicate that human resource policies and leadership practices are warranted that support dual-military/career couples (e.g., reducing unnecessary moves, providing targeted transitional assistance) as well as preventative and clinical interventions to mitigate severe problems disproportionately faced by women (e.g., community efforts to identify and mitigate risks of abuse and divorce).

贪婪制度下的社会角色冲突:性别、配偶的军事地位和军人的婚姻问题
由于社会角色期望,从事“性别非典型”职业(即主要由不同性别的工人组成的职业)的个人经常面临可能阻碍健康亲密关系的独特工作压力(Yu &;郭,2021)。与此同时,“贪婪的机构”(即那些期望成员完全投入的机构,如家庭、军队)要求成员完全投入,并可能增加婚姻问题的风险。女性与工作紧张的专业人士的高结婚率也可能导致工作/家庭紧张(Yu & &;郭,2021)。然而,在像军队这样的性别非典型、贪婪的机构中,一个人的性别和配偶的职业是如何与特定的婚姻问题联系在一起的,我们所知甚少。本研究利用美国空军社区反馈工具(N = 28,745)来检验性别、配偶军籍和现役成员认可的婚姻问题类型(如沟通、离婚、虐待、分居)之间的比率和关联。比率比较显示,女军人比男军人更容易出现各种婚姻问题。在控制了潜在的混杂变量之后,配偶的军事身份缓和了性别与两个问题之间的关系,这两个问题可能在贪婪的军事机构中加剧:角色转换和分居。这一发现表明,总的来说,服役女性承担着更多的婚姻负担,只有当男性的配偶服役时,他们才会遇到类似的婚姻问题。结果表明,有必要制定人力资源政策和领导实践,以支持双重军人/职业夫妇(例如,减少不必要的搬家,提供有针对性的过渡援助),并采取预防和临床干预措施,以减轻妇女面临的严重问题(例如,社区努力识别和减轻虐待和离婚风险)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sex Roles
Sex Roles Multiple-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Sex Roles: A Journal of Research is a global, multidisciplinary, scholarly, social and behavioral science journal with a feminist perspective. It publishes original research reports as well as original theoretical papers and conceptual review articles that explore how gender organizes people’s lives and their surrounding worlds, including gender identities, belief systems, representations, interactions, relations, organizations, institutions, and statuses. The range of topics covered is broad and dynamic, including but not limited to the study of gendered attitudes, stereotyping, and sexism; gendered contexts, culture, and power; the intersections of gender with race, class, sexual orientation, age, and other statuses and identities; body image; violence; gender (including masculinities) and feminist identities; human sexuality; communication studies; work and organizations; gendered development across the life span or life course; mental, physical, and reproductive health and health care; sports; interpersonal relationships and attraction; activism and social change; economic, political, and legal inequities; and methodological challenges and innovations in doing gender research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信