{"title":"Geometry Dependence of the Receding Angle of a Droplet on a Solid Cylindrical Surface","authors":"Mingzhu Cui, Anthony D. Dinsmore","doi":"10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c00936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Droplets that partially wet solid surfaces exhibit hysteresis in their contact angle. The values of the minimum (receding) and maximum (advancing) angles, θ<sub>R</sub> and θ<sub>A</sub>, are empirically well-defined and thought to be unique for a given set of materials. We measured the contact angles of water droplets hanging from hydrophobic, PDMS-functionalized glass and found that the value of θ<sub>R</sub> varies with the curvature of the glass. The effect is substantial: θ<sub>R</sub> changes from 86.0 ± 1.9° on a flat plate to 95.6 ± 1.9° on a 2 mm diameter rod of the same material. The measured values of θ<sub>A</sub> were independent of geometry (θ<sub>A</sub> = 103.2 ± 0.9°). We found a consistent trend among PDMS-functionalized glass cylinders with diameters ranging from 2 to 12.7 mm. We also measured the speed at which the contact line moved just after receding; these results showed a receding speed ∝ cos(θ<sub>R</sub>) – cos(θ<sub>E</sub>) and a consistent equilibrium contact angle, θ<sub>E</sub> = 103.4 ± 2.3°. Finally, we measured the sliding of water droplets as rods were tilted. The larger θ<sub>R</sub> (and thus smaller hysteresis) for a 2 mm-diameter rod led to droplets sliding at a tilt angle of just 21° from horizontal, compared to the 48° minimum tilt for a 7 mm rod. The results show that hysteresis arises from an energy barrier that depends on the shape of the droplet and contact line, both of which change with substrate curvature. The results may lead to designing surfaces that better trap water droplets or shed them for self-cleaning or water-harvesting applications.","PeriodicalId":50,"journal":{"name":"Langmuir","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langmuir","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c00936","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Droplets that partially wet solid surfaces exhibit hysteresis in their contact angle. The values of the minimum (receding) and maximum (advancing) angles, θR and θA, are empirically well-defined and thought to be unique for a given set of materials. We measured the contact angles of water droplets hanging from hydrophobic, PDMS-functionalized glass and found that the value of θR varies with the curvature of the glass. The effect is substantial: θR changes from 86.0 ± 1.9° on a flat plate to 95.6 ± 1.9° on a 2 mm diameter rod of the same material. The measured values of θA were independent of geometry (θA = 103.2 ± 0.9°). We found a consistent trend among PDMS-functionalized glass cylinders with diameters ranging from 2 to 12.7 mm. We also measured the speed at which the contact line moved just after receding; these results showed a receding speed ∝ cos(θR) – cos(θE) and a consistent equilibrium contact angle, θE = 103.4 ± 2.3°. Finally, we measured the sliding of water droplets as rods were tilted. The larger θR (and thus smaller hysteresis) for a 2 mm-diameter rod led to droplets sliding at a tilt angle of just 21° from horizontal, compared to the 48° minimum tilt for a 7 mm rod. The results show that hysteresis arises from an energy barrier that depends on the shape of the droplet and contact line, both of which change with substrate curvature. The results may lead to designing surfaces that better trap water droplets or shed them for self-cleaning or water-harvesting applications.
期刊介绍:
Langmuir is an interdisciplinary journal publishing articles in the following subject categories:
Colloids: surfactants and self-assembly, dispersions, emulsions, foams
Interfaces: adsorption, reactions, films, forces
Biological Interfaces: biocolloids, biomolecular and biomimetic materials
Materials: nano- and mesostructured materials, polymers, gels, liquid crystals
Electrochemistry: interfacial charge transfer, charge transport, electrocatalysis, electrokinetic phenomena, bioelectrochemistry
Devices and Applications: sensors, fluidics, patterning, catalysis, photonic crystals
However, when high-impact, original work is submitted that does not fit within the above categories, decisions to accept or decline such papers will be based on one criteria: What Would Irving Do?
Langmuir ranks #2 in citations out of 136 journals in the category of Physical Chemistry with 113,157 total citations. The journal received an Impact Factor of 4.384*.
This journal is also indexed in the categories of Materials Science (ranked #1) and Multidisciplinary Chemistry (ranked #5).