Hector Lopez-Ospina, Fernando Manzano-Ramallo, Carlos A. Gonzalez-Calderon, Diana P. Moreno-Palacio, Paula Penagos
{"title":"Freight tour synthesis based on entropy maximization with fuzzy parameters including variability in transportation costs through the Markowitz model","authors":"Hector Lopez-Ospina, Fernando Manzano-Ramallo, Carlos A. Gonzalez-Calderon, Diana P. Moreno-Palacio, Paula Penagos","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10614-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research develops an optimization model to quantify and minimize the risk associated with the variability of travel costs in freight tour synthesis (FTS) transportation problems. The model integrates objectives of maximizing trip entropy to generate diverse solutions alongside minimizing costs. Demand and supply parameters are modeled using fuzzy logic to incorporate the inherent uncertainty of these data. A recent extension of the Markowitz investment model was adapted to account for cost variability. The primary goal is to equip transportation planners with a decision-making tool that incorporates uncertainty. A comparative analysis of different objectives is conducted to assess the effects of risk on outcomes. The multi-criteria TOPSIS method was utilized as a robust tool to select solutions for this multi-objective problem. Results reveal that solutions with high entropy and variability balance risk and flexibility, while those minimizing variance offer more stable solutions with lower risk. Consistently minimizing total cost resulted in the lowest costs, but at the same time, it led to the highest risk. The membership level showed that maximizing entropy and minimizing variance generated similar compliance levels, with lower variability in the case of entropy. Cost minimization resulted in lower compliance, indicating a trade-off between cost and effectiveness in the transportation network. The research demonstrates that prioritizing risk minimization enhances the average membership level compared to approaches focused on cost minimization or entropy maximization. By effectively managing and reducing uncertainty in transportation networks, the developed model serves as a tool for managing and reducing uncertainty in a transportation network, enhancing resilience. Furthermore, its adaptability offers potential applications across diverse aspects of logistics and industry, providing a framework for designing more robust, adaptive, and effective operational strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10614-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research develops an optimization model to quantify and minimize the risk associated with the variability of travel costs in freight tour synthesis (FTS) transportation problems. The model integrates objectives of maximizing trip entropy to generate diverse solutions alongside minimizing costs. Demand and supply parameters are modeled using fuzzy logic to incorporate the inherent uncertainty of these data. A recent extension of the Markowitz investment model was adapted to account for cost variability. The primary goal is to equip transportation planners with a decision-making tool that incorporates uncertainty. A comparative analysis of different objectives is conducted to assess the effects of risk on outcomes. The multi-criteria TOPSIS method was utilized as a robust tool to select solutions for this multi-objective problem. Results reveal that solutions with high entropy and variability balance risk and flexibility, while those minimizing variance offer more stable solutions with lower risk. Consistently minimizing total cost resulted in the lowest costs, but at the same time, it led to the highest risk. The membership level showed that maximizing entropy and minimizing variance generated similar compliance levels, with lower variability in the case of entropy. Cost minimization resulted in lower compliance, indicating a trade-off between cost and effectiveness in the transportation network. The research demonstrates that prioritizing risk minimization enhances the average membership level compared to approaches focused on cost minimization or entropy maximization. By effectively managing and reducing uncertainty in transportation networks, the developed model serves as a tool for managing and reducing uncertainty in a transportation network, enhancing resilience. Furthermore, its adaptability offers potential applications across diverse aspects of logistics and industry, providing a framework for designing more robust, adaptive, and effective operational strategies.
期刊介绍:
In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world.
These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.