Freight tour synthesis based on entropy maximization with fuzzy parameters including variability in transportation costs through the Markowitz model

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Hector Lopez-Ospina, Fernando Manzano-Ramallo, Carlos A. Gonzalez-Calderon, Diana P. Moreno-Palacio, Paula Penagos
{"title":"Freight tour synthesis based on entropy maximization with fuzzy parameters including variability in transportation costs through the Markowitz model","authors":"Hector Lopez-Ospina, Fernando Manzano-Ramallo, Carlos A. Gonzalez-Calderon, Diana P. Moreno-Palacio, Paula Penagos","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10614-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research develops an optimization model to quantify and minimize the risk associated with the variability of travel costs in freight tour synthesis (FTS) transportation problems. The model integrates objectives of maximizing trip entropy to generate diverse solutions alongside minimizing costs. Demand and supply parameters are modeled using fuzzy logic to incorporate the inherent uncertainty of these data. A recent extension of the Markowitz investment model was adapted to account for cost variability. The primary goal is to equip transportation planners with a decision-making tool that incorporates uncertainty. A comparative analysis of different objectives is conducted to assess the effects of risk on outcomes. The multi-criteria TOPSIS method was utilized as a robust tool to select solutions for this multi-objective problem. Results reveal that solutions with high entropy and variability balance risk and flexibility, while those minimizing variance offer more stable solutions with lower risk. Consistently minimizing total cost resulted in the lowest costs, but at the same time, it led to the highest risk. The membership level showed that maximizing entropy and minimizing variance generated similar compliance levels, with lower variability in the case of entropy. Cost minimization resulted in lower compliance, indicating a trade-off between cost and effectiveness in the transportation network. The research demonstrates that prioritizing risk minimization enhances the average membership level compared to approaches focused on cost minimization or entropy maximization. By effectively managing and reducing uncertainty in transportation networks, the developed model serves as a tool for managing and reducing uncertainty in a transportation network, enhancing resilience. Furthermore, its adaptability offers potential applications across diverse aspects of logistics and industry, providing a framework for designing more robust, adaptive, and effective operational strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10614-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research develops an optimization model to quantify and minimize the risk associated with the variability of travel costs in freight tour synthesis (FTS) transportation problems. The model integrates objectives of maximizing trip entropy to generate diverse solutions alongside minimizing costs. Demand and supply parameters are modeled using fuzzy logic to incorporate the inherent uncertainty of these data. A recent extension of the Markowitz investment model was adapted to account for cost variability. The primary goal is to equip transportation planners with a decision-making tool that incorporates uncertainty. A comparative analysis of different objectives is conducted to assess the effects of risk on outcomes. The multi-criteria TOPSIS method was utilized as a robust tool to select solutions for this multi-objective problem. Results reveal that solutions with high entropy and variability balance risk and flexibility, while those minimizing variance offer more stable solutions with lower risk. Consistently minimizing total cost resulted in the lowest costs, but at the same time, it led to the highest risk. The membership level showed that maximizing entropy and minimizing variance generated similar compliance levels, with lower variability in the case of entropy. Cost minimization resulted in lower compliance, indicating a trade-off between cost and effectiveness in the transportation network. The research demonstrates that prioritizing risk minimization enhances the average membership level compared to approaches focused on cost minimization or entropy maximization. By effectively managing and reducing uncertainty in transportation networks, the developed model serves as a tool for managing and reducing uncertainty in a transportation network, enhancing resilience. Furthermore, its adaptability offers potential applications across diverse aspects of logistics and industry, providing a framework for designing more robust, adaptive, and effective operational strategies.

基于Markowitz模型的包含运输成本变化的模糊参数熵最大化货运行程综合
本研究建立了一个优化模型,以量化和最小化货运旅游综合运输问题中与旅行成本变化相关的风险。该模型综合了最大行程熵的目标,以产生多种解决方案,同时最小化成本。需求和供给参数采用模糊逻辑建模,以纳入这些数据的固有不确定性。最近对马科维茨投资模型的扩展被用来解释成本的可变性。主要目标是为交通规划者提供一种考虑不确定性的决策工具。对不同目标进行比较分析,以评估风险对结果的影响。采用多准则TOPSIS方法作为多目标问题的鲁棒选择工具。结果表明,高熵和多变性的解决方案能够平衡风险和灵活性,而最小方差的解决方案能够提供更稳定的解决方案,且风险更低。总成本的持续最小化会带来最低的成本,但同时也会带来最高的风险。隶属度水平表明,最大熵和最小方差产生相似的服从水平,熵情况下变异性较低。成本最小化导致了较低的依从性,这表明了运输网络中成本和效率之间的权衡。研究表明,与专注于成本最小化或熵最大化的方法相比,优先考虑风险最小化可以提高平均成员水平。通过有效地管理和减少交通网络中的不确定性,所开发的模型可以作为管理和减少交通网络中的不确定性的工具,增强弹性。此外,它的适应性为物流和工业的各个方面提供了潜在的应用,为设计更健壮、适应性更强和更有效的运营策略提供了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信