Vincent Buness, Maja K. Sundqvist, Syed Tuhin Ali, Peter Annighöfer, Carlos Miguel Aragon, Isabelle Lanzrein, Daniel B. Metcalfe, Marie-Charlotte Nilsson, Michael J. Gundale
{"title":"Resource quantity and heterogeneity drive successional plant diversity in managed and unmanaged boreal forests","authors":"Vincent Buness, Maja K. Sundqvist, Syed Tuhin Ali, Peter Annighöfer, Carlos Miguel Aragon, Isabelle Lanzrein, Daniel B. Metcalfe, Marie-Charlotte Nilsson, Michael J. Gundale","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The understory vegetation of boreal forests plays a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity by creating habitats, supplying food resources, and regulating microclimate and soil conditions. This essential layer is frequently affected by disturbances such as forest fires and clear-cutting, which significantly alter understory communities and the ecosystem resource availability and heterogeneity. This study aimed to understand how these disturbances influence the spatial and temporal dynamics of key ecosystem resources, and subsequently the patterns of understory diversity. We analyzed and compared understory vegetation diversity in a rotational management chronosequence and an unmanaged fire chronosequence of Scots pine <i>Pinus sylvestris</i> forests across northern Sweden. We assessed the relationship of above- and belowground resource availability and heterogeneity with alpha and beta diversity using generalized additive models and multivariate analyses. We found that belowground resource availability (especially inorganic nitrogen) and aboveground resource heterogeneity (especially variation in forest structural complexity) were most strongly positively correlated with alpha and beta diversity, varying across successional stages. In early stages (0–60 years), high availability of belowground resources and aboveground heterogeneity was associated with high alpha and beta diversity. In mid-stages (100–200 years), reduced belowground resource availability and aboveground heterogeneity was linked to lower diversity. In late stages (> 250 years, which only exists in the unmanaged fire chronosequence), increased aboveground heterogeneity associated with tree mortality was linked to a resurgence in alpha and beta diversity. These results highlight the necessity of maintaining a mosaic of stands with different disturbance regimes and successional stages, particularly early post-fire stands and late successional stands, which are currently much rarer on the landscape, to support biodiversity at the landscape level.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07676","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The understory vegetation of boreal forests plays a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity by creating habitats, supplying food resources, and regulating microclimate and soil conditions. This essential layer is frequently affected by disturbances such as forest fires and clear-cutting, which significantly alter understory communities and the ecosystem resource availability and heterogeneity. This study aimed to understand how these disturbances influence the spatial and temporal dynamics of key ecosystem resources, and subsequently the patterns of understory diversity. We analyzed and compared understory vegetation diversity in a rotational management chronosequence and an unmanaged fire chronosequence of Scots pine Pinus sylvestris forests across northern Sweden. We assessed the relationship of above- and belowground resource availability and heterogeneity with alpha and beta diversity using generalized additive models and multivariate analyses. We found that belowground resource availability (especially inorganic nitrogen) and aboveground resource heterogeneity (especially variation in forest structural complexity) were most strongly positively correlated with alpha and beta diversity, varying across successional stages. In early stages (0–60 years), high availability of belowground resources and aboveground heterogeneity was associated with high alpha and beta diversity. In mid-stages (100–200 years), reduced belowground resource availability and aboveground heterogeneity was linked to lower diversity. In late stages (> 250 years, which only exists in the unmanaged fire chronosequence), increased aboveground heterogeneity associated with tree mortality was linked to a resurgence in alpha and beta diversity. These results highlight the necessity of maintaining a mosaic of stands with different disturbance regimes and successional stages, particularly early post-fire stands and late successional stands, which are currently much rarer on the landscape, to support biodiversity at the landscape level.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.