Communication Processes Related to Decision-Making in Medication Management Between Healthcare Providers, Older People and Their Carers: A Systematic Review

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Deana M. Copley, Elizabeth Manias, Vanessa Watkins, Alison M. Hutchinson
{"title":"Communication Processes Related to Decision-Making in Medication Management Between Healthcare Providers, Older People and Their Carers: A Systematic Review","authors":"Deana M. Copley,&nbsp;Elizabeth Manias,&nbsp;Vanessa Watkins,&nbsp;Alison M. Hutchinson","doi":"10.1111/hex.70252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To examine decision-making between healthcare providers (HCPs), older people and their carers in relation to medication management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Four databases were systematically searched up to June 2023. Two authors screened the search results. Extracted quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed thematically.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty-three papers reporting on 49 studies were included. A variety of research methods were utilised. Few authors provided a definition of shared decision-making (SDM). Three major themes were identified: provider-driven decision-making, patient-driven decision-making and a shared role in decision-making. Some older people preferred or deferred to provider-driven decision-making, mainly due to trust in the HCP's expertise. Other reasons for provider-driven decision-making were patient anxiety, declining health, lack of medical knowledge or poor communication during the clinical encounter. Evidence of patient-driven decision-making was often prompted by concerns about the adverse effects of medication. Most older people preferred or adopted a shared role in decision-making.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Whilst most patients and carers preferred to engage in SDM related to medication management, at times, they felt unable to do so, deferring to provider-driven decision-making. There is a need for a standardised definition and measurement of SDM.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review did not directly involve older people or carers of older people in the design or conduct of the review. However, the findings will inform a qualitative study aimed at exploring older people and their carers' experiences of medication-related decision-making in collaboration with their healthcare provider.</p>\n \n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> CRD42019124862.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70252","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine decision-making between healthcare providers (HCPs), older people and their carers in relation to medication management.

Methods

Four databases were systematically searched up to June 2023. Two authors screened the search results. Extracted quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed thematically.

Results

Fifty-three papers reporting on 49 studies were included. A variety of research methods were utilised. Few authors provided a definition of shared decision-making (SDM). Three major themes were identified: provider-driven decision-making, patient-driven decision-making and a shared role in decision-making. Some older people preferred or deferred to provider-driven decision-making, mainly due to trust in the HCP's expertise. Other reasons for provider-driven decision-making were patient anxiety, declining health, lack of medical knowledge or poor communication during the clinical encounter. Evidence of patient-driven decision-making was often prompted by concerns about the adverse effects of medication. Most older people preferred or adopted a shared role in decision-making.

Conclusion

Whilst most patients and carers preferred to engage in SDM related to medication management, at times, they felt unable to do so, deferring to provider-driven decision-making. There is a need for a standardised definition and measurement of SDM.

Patient or Public Contribution

This systematic review did not directly involve older people or carers of older people in the design or conduct of the review. However, the findings will inform a qualitative study aimed at exploring older people and their carers' experiences of medication-related decision-making in collaboration with their healthcare provider.

Trial Registration: CRD42019124862.

Abstract Image

医疗保健提供者、老年人和他们的照顾者之间药物管理决策的沟通过程:系统回顾
目的探讨医疗服务提供者(HCPs)、老年人及其护理人员在药物管理方面的决策。方法系统检索截至2023年6月的4个数据库。两位作者筛选了搜索结果。提取的定量数据进行描述性分析,定性数据进行主题性分析。结果共纳入文献53篇,49项研究。使用了多种研究方法。很少有作者给出了共同决策(SDM)的定义。确定了三个主要主题:提供者驱动的决策、患者驱动的决策和决策中的共同作用。一些老年人更倾向于或推迟由医疗服务提供者主导的决策,这主要是由于对HCP的专业知识的信任。提供者驱动决策的其他原因是患者焦虑、健康状况下降、缺乏医学知识或临床接触期间沟通不畅。有证据表明,患者驱动的决策往往是由对药物副作用的担忧引起的。大多数老年人更喜欢或接受共同参与决策。结论虽然大多数患者和护理人员倾向于参与与药物管理相关的SDM,但有时他们感到无法做到这一点,从而服从提供者驱动的决策。有必要对SDM进行标准化的定义和测量。患者或公众贡献本系统评价在设计或实施评价时没有直接涉及老年人或老年人的照顾者。然而,这些发现将为一项旨在探索老年人及其护理人员与医疗保健提供者合作进行药物相关决策的经验的定性研究提供信息。试验注册:CRD42019124862。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信