Predicting shear strength of unsaturated soils based on soil–water retention curve

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Xiongdong Lan, YueQin Qiu, Xiao Zhang, Xianghui Li
{"title":"Predicting shear strength of unsaturated soils based on soil–water retention curve","authors":"Xiongdong Lan,&nbsp;YueQin Qiu,&nbsp;Xiao Zhang,&nbsp;Xianghui Li","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12226-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The complexity of unsaturated cohesive soil behavior presents challenges in directly measuring unsaturated shear strength, making it a complex and time-consuming task. Scholars have proposed indirect models to estimate unsaturated strength using soil–water retention curves and saturated shear strength indicators. However, scholars lack consistency in defining parameters to characterize apparent cohesion, resulting in a lack of standardized expressions. To establish a unified model for predicting the strength of different types of unsaturated cohesive soils, existing unsaturated shear strength models based on soil–water retention curves were systematically reviewed. Fifteen sets of experimental data were collected and utilized to analyze and compare the predictive performance of these models. It was observed that existing predictive models partially reflect the strength of unsaturated cohesive soils to some extent. However, they have applicability limitations and fail to predict the unsaturated shear strength of all soil types fully. An improved model for the shear strength of unsaturated cohesive soil was developed to overcome these limitations based on the Khalili and Khabbaz (1998) model. This improvement involved replacing a fixed empirical value in the Khalili and Khabbaz (1998) model with the water loss obtained from the soil–water retention curve. The average relative error (ARE) and normalized sum of square error (SSE) were used to quantitatively evaluate the predictive accuracy of the unsaturated soil strength model, comparing the improved model with existing ones. The analysis revealed that the improved model demonstrated higher prediction accuracy across fifteen types of unsaturated soils. Furthermore, soil–water retention curve tests and unsaturated triaxial tests were performed on two types of test soils, with sand-clay mass ratios of 3:2 and 1:4, respectively. By comparing the test data, the effectiveness of the improved model in predicting shear strength was evaluated, affirming its generalizability and accuracy in estimating the shear strength of unsaturated clay soils.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12226-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The complexity of unsaturated cohesive soil behavior presents challenges in directly measuring unsaturated shear strength, making it a complex and time-consuming task. Scholars have proposed indirect models to estimate unsaturated strength using soil–water retention curves and saturated shear strength indicators. However, scholars lack consistency in defining parameters to characterize apparent cohesion, resulting in a lack of standardized expressions. To establish a unified model for predicting the strength of different types of unsaturated cohesive soils, existing unsaturated shear strength models based on soil–water retention curves were systematically reviewed. Fifteen sets of experimental data were collected and utilized to analyze and compare the predictive performance of these models. It was observed that existing predictive models partially reflect the strength of unsaturated cohesive soils to some extent. However, they have applicability limitations and fail to predict the unsaturated shear strength of all soil types fully. An improved model for the shear strength of unsaturated cohesive soil was developed to overcome these limitations based on the Khalili and Khabbaz (1998) model. This improvement involved replacing a fixed empirical value in the Khalili and Khabbaz (1998) model with the water loss obtained from the soil–water retention curve. The average relative error (ARE) and normalized sum of square error (SSE) were used to quantitatively evaluate the predictive accuracy of the unsaturated soil strength model, comparing the improved model with existing ones. The analysis revealed that the improved model demonstrated higher prediction accuracy across fifteen types of unsaturated soils. Furthermore, soil–water retention curve tests and unsaturated triaxial tests were performed on two types of test soils, with sand-clay mass ratios of 3:2 and 1:4, respectively. By comparing the test data, the effectiveness of the improved model in predicting shear strength was evaluated, affirming its generalizability and accuracy in estimating the shear strength of unsaturated clay soils.

根据土壤保水曲线预测非饱和土壤的抗剪强度
非饱和黏结土特性的复杂性给直接测量非饱和抗剪强度带来了挑战,这是一项复杂而耗时的任务。学者们提出了利用土水保持曲线和饱和抗剪强度指标估算非饱和强度的间接模型。然而,学者们在表征表观衔接的参数定义上缺乏一致性,导致缺乏标准化的表达。为了建立统一的非饱和黏性土强度预测模型,系统综述了现有的基于土水保持曲线的非饱和抗剪强度模型。收集了15组实验数据,并对这些模型的预测性能进行了分析和比较。现有的预测模型在一定程度上部分反映了非饱和黏性土的强度。然而,它们具有适用性的局限性,不能充分预测所有土型的非饱和抗剪强度。为了克服这些局限性,在Khalili和Khabbaz(1998)模型的基础上开发了一种改进的非饱和粘性土抗剪强度模型。这一改进包括将Khalili和Khabbaz(1998)模型中的固定经验值替换为从土壤-水保持曲线中获得的水分流失量。利用平均相对误差(ARE)和归一化误差平方和(SSE)定量评价非饱和土强度模型的预测精度,并将改进模型与现有模型进行比较。分析表明,改进模型对15种非饱和土具有较高的预测精度。在砂粘比分别为3:2和1:4的两种试验土上进行了土-水保持曲线试验和非饱和三轴试验。通过对比试验数据,评价了改进模型在非饱和粘土抗剪强度预测中的有效性,验证了改进模型在非饱和粘土抗剪强度预测中的普遍性和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信