Analytical and comparative study of pterional craniotomy related to temporalis muscle dissection techniques: Interfascial temporalis and myocutaneous flap

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pedro Henrique Mouty Rabello , Yuri Estevam Bandeira , Victor Zanetti Strutz , João Paulo Mota Telles , Gustavo Rassier Isolan , Carlos G. Carlotti Jr , Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
{"title":"Analytical and comparative study of pterional craniotomy related to temporalis muscle dissection techniques: Interfascial temporalis and myocutaneous flap","authors":"Pedro Henrique Mouty Rabello ,&nbsp;Yuri Estevam Bandeira ,&nbsp;Victor Zanetti Strutz ,&nbsp;João Paulo Mota Telles ,&nbsp;Gustavo Rassier Isolan ,&nbsp;Carlos G. Carlotti Jr ,&nbsp;Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><div>The pterional craniotomy (PT) is a widely used neurosurgery approach that provides access to various intracranial structures. This study compared the exposure provided by 2 techniques for temporalis muscle mobilization: interfascial dissection (IF) and myocutaneous flap (MF).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eight adult cadavers underwent sequential craniotomies on the left side using both techniques. The measurement areas of surgical exposure, angular exposure, and linear exposure of the basilar artery were determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results showed no significant difference in the total area of exposure or linear exposure of the basilar artery between the IF and MF. However, interfascial dissection provided significantly greater vertical angular exposure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although both techniques offer comparable horizontal exposures, the choice between them should consider the anticipated working angles. The interfascial temporalis flap may be preferred for broader vertical exposure is required.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 111274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825002462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

The pterional craniotomy (PT) is a widely used neurosurgery approach that provides access to various intracranial structures. This study compared the exposure provided by 2 techniques for temporalis muscle mobilization: interfascial dissection (IF) and myocutaneous flap (MF).

Methods

Eight adult cadavers underwent sequential craniotomies on the left side using both techniques. The measurement areas of surgical exposure, angular exposure, and linear exposure of the basilar artery were determined.

Results

Results showed no significant difference in the total area of exposure or linear exposure of the basilar artery between the IF and MF. However, interfascial dissection provided significantly greater vertical angular exposure.

Conclusion

Although both techniques offer comparable horizontal exposures, the choice between them should consider the anticipated working angles. The interfascial temporalis flap may be preferred for broader vertical exposure is required.
翼点开颅颞肌剥离技术的分析与比较:颞筋膜间肌与肌皮瓣
背景与目的翼点开颅术(PT)是一种广泛应用的神经外科入路,可进入各种颅内结构。本研究比较了两种颞肌动员技术:筋膜间剥离(IF)和肌皮瓣(MF)所提供的暴露。方法采用两种方法对8具成人尸体行左侧连续开颅术。确定基底动脉手术暴露、角度暴露和线性暴露的测量区域。结果在基底动脉总暴露面积和线性暴露面积上,IF和MF无显著差异。然而,筋膜间剥离提供了更大的垂直角度暴露。结论虽然两种技术的水平暴露程度相当,但在选择时应考虑预期的工作角度。当需要较宽的垂直暴露时,颞叶筋膜间皮瓣可能是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信