The remapping of peripersonal space after stroke, spinal cord injury and amputation: A PRISMA systematic review

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Riccardo De Pastina , Salvatore Gaetano Chiarella , Luca Simione , Antonino Raffone , Mariella Pazzaglia
{"title":"The remapping of peripersonal space after stroke, spinal cord injury and amputation: A PRISMA systematic review","authors":"Riccardo De Pastina ,&nbsp;Salvatore Gaetano Chiarella ,&nbsp;Luca Simione ,&nbsp;Antonino Raffone ,&nbsp;Mariella Pazzaglia","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Peripersonal space (PPS) is the body-centered area where interactions occur and objects can be reached. Its boundaries are dynamic, modulated by ongoing sensorimotor experiences: limb immobilization shrinks PPS, whereas tool use expands it. However, consistent clinical information on PPS alterations remains limited due to methodological heterogeneity, varying types and severities of sensorimotor disorders, and diverse experimental paradigms. This review explores the causal mechanisms of PPS processing by integrating findings from brain-lesioned patients and individuals with body deafferentation, such as amputees and spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. By comparing the effects of brain lesions and sensorimotor deafferentation, it clarifies how PPS is encoded, maintained, and reorganized following central nervous system damage, bodily changes, and the use of assistive devices. A systematic search of Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed identified 17 studies: 4 on stroke patients (N = 100), 6 on SCI patients (N = 104), and 7 on amputees (N = 65). Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Despite the limited number of studies and methodological variability, findings consistently show that sensorimotor changes significantly affect PPS. Notably, a contraction of PPS around the affected limb was observed in stroke, SCI patients, and amputees. Assistive devices were able to restore PPS after training, or even immediately in the case of prosthesis use. A shared neurophysiological mechanism across these conditions may underlie PPS as an online construct, continuously updated to reflect the body’s current state and its interaction with the environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 106168"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014976342500168X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peripersonal space (PPS) is the body-centered area where interactions occur and objects can be reached. Its boundaries are dynamic, modulated by ongoing sensorimotor experiences: limb immobilization shrinks PPS, whereas tool use expands it. However, consistent clinical information on PPS alterations remains limited due to methodological heterogeneity, varying types and severities of sensorimotor disorders, and diverse experimental paradigms. This review explores the causal mechanisms of PPS processing by integrating findings from brain-lesioned patients and individuals with body deafferentation, such as amputees and spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. By comparing the effects of brain lesions and sensorimotor deafferentation, it clarifies how PPS is encoded, maintained, and reorganized following central nervous system damage, bodily changes, and the use of assistive devices. A systematic search of Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed identified 17 studies: 4 on stroke patients (N = 100), 6 on SCI patients (N = 104), and 7 on amputees (N = 65). Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Despite the limited number of studies and methodological variability, findings consistently show that sensorimotor changes significantly affect PPS. Notably, a contraction of PPS around the affected limb was observed in stroke, SCI patients, and amputees. Assistive devices were able to restore PPS after training, or even immediately in the case of prosthesis use. A shared neurophysiological mechanism across these conditions may underlie PPS as an online construct, continuously updated to reflect the body’s current state and its interaction with the environment.
卒中、脊髓损伤和截肢后周围空间的重新定位:一项PRISMA系统综述
周身空间(PPS)是以身体为中心的区域,在这一区域中会发生互动并可接触到物体。它的边界是动态的,受正在进行的感觉运动体验的调节:肢体固定会缩小周身空间,而工具的使用则会扩大周身空间。然而,由于方法的异质性、感知觉运动障碍的类型和严重程度不同以及实验范式的多样性,有关 PPS 改变的一致临床信息仍然有限。本综述综合了脑损伤患者和肢体失能患者(如截肢者和脊髓损伤(SCI)患者)的研究结果,探讨了PPS处理的因果机制。通过比较脑损伤和感觉运动失调的影响,该研究阐明了 PPS 在中枢神经系统受损、身体变化和使用辅助设备后是如何编码、维持和重组的。通过对 Scopus、Web of Science 和 PubMed 的系统搜索,我们发现了 17 项研究:其中 4 项针对中风患者(100 人),6 项针对 SCI 患者(104 人),7 项针对截肢者(65 人)。采用观察性队列和横断面研究质量评估工具对偏倚风险进行了评估。尽管研究数量有限,研究方法也不尽相同,但研究结果一致表明,感觉运动变化对 PPS 有显著影响。值得注意的是,在中风、SCI 患者和截肢者中观察到患肢周围的 PPS 收缩。辅助设备能够在训练后恢复 PPS,甚至在使用假肢的情况下立即恢复 PPS。在这些情况下,一种共同的神经生理机制可能是PPS作为一种在线结构的基础,不断更新以反映身体的当前状态及其与环境的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信