Evaluation of immune responses and protection in Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer Bloch, 1790) against Vibrio vulnificus using immersion and oral nanoemulsion vaccines

IF 4.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Chatchai Rodwihok , Kim D. Thompson , Prapansak Srisapoome , Patcharapong Thangsunan , Pattanapong Thangsunan , Wararut Buncharoen , Kanokporn Saenphet , Supap Saenphet , Pakapon Meachasompop , Benchawan Kumwan , Jasper Kit Tangal , Nugroho Wiratama , Thao Thu Mai , Anurak Uchuwittayakul
{"title":"Evaluation of immune responses and protection in Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer Bloch, 1790) against Vibrio vulnificus using immersion and oral nanoemulsion vaccines","authors":"Chatchai Rodwihok ,&nbsp;Kim D. Thompson ,&nbsp;Prapansak Srisapoome ,&nbsp;Patcharapong Thangsunan ,&nbsp;Pattanapong Thangsunan ,&nbsp;Wararut Buncharoen ,&nbsp;Kanokporn Saenphet ,&nbsp;Supap Saenphet ,&nbsp;Pakapon Meachasompop ,&nbsp;Benchawan Kumwan ,&nbsp;Jasper Kit Tangal ,&nbsp;Nugroho Wiratama ,&nbsp;Thao Thu Mai ,&nbsp;Anurak Uchuwittayakul","doi":"10.1016/j.fsi.2025.110354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vaccination is an important strategy in aquaculture for enhancing disease resistance and ensuring the health and productivity of cultured fish. This study investigated the distinct systemic and mucosal immune responses elicited by immersion (ImV) and oral (OrV) nanoemulsion vaccines encapsulating <em>Vibrio vulnificus</em> in Asian seabass (<em>Lates calcarifer</em>). Two vaccination methods, ImV and OrV, were administered to separate groups of Asian seabass, followed by challenges with <em>V. vulnificus</em> via immersion and intraperitoneal (<em>i.p.</em>) injection administration. Immune responses were assessed by measuring specific IgM antibodies, lysozyme activity, bactericidal activity, and immune-related gene expression across multiple organs, including serum, head kidney, liver, gills, skin, and intestine. The results demonstrate that the OrV group had a significantly increased level of specific IgM antibody in their serum, head kidney and liver compared to the immersion vaccine group and control, with the OrV group maintaining higher antibody levels post-immersion and injection challenge. In mucosal tissues, the ImV group elicited stronger IgM responses in the gills and skin, whereas the OrV group enhanced antibody responses in the liver and intestine. Lysozyme and bactericidal activities varied by organ and vaccination route, indicating differential activation of innate immune defenses. Additionally, immune-related gene expression was upregulated in a tissue-specific manner, reflecting the targeted activation of adaptive and innate immune mechanisms by each vaccine type. Both vaccination strategies significantly improved survival and relative percent survival (RPS), with ImV offering stronger protection against immersion challenges, while OrV provided strong protection in systemic (injection) challenges. These findings suggest that ImV and OrV groups induced distinct immune responses in Asian seabass, with immersion vaccination primarily enhancing mucosal immunity at barrier surfaces and oral vaccination promoting systemic and intestinal mucosal immunity. The integration of both vaccination strategies could provide synergistic protection, enhancing vaccine efficacy against <em>V. vulnificus</em> and other pathogens, thereby optimizing disease prevention and fish health management in aquaculture settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12127,"journal":{"name":"Fish & shellfish immunology","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 110354"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish & shellfish immunology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050464825002438","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccination is an important strategy in aquaculture for enhancing disease resistance and ensuring the health and productivity of cultured fish. This study investigated the distinct systemic and mucosal immune responses elicited by immersion (ImV) and oral (OrV) nanoemulsion vaccines encapsulating Vibrio vulnificus in Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer). Two vaccination methods, ImV and OrV, were administered to separate groups of Asian seabass, followed by challenges with V. vulnificus via immersion and intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection administration. Immune responses were assessed by measuring specific IgM antibodies, lysozyme activity, bactericidal activity, and immune-related gene expression across multiple organs, including serum, head kidney, liver, gills, skin, and intestine. The results demonstrate that the OrV group had a significantly increased level of specific IgM antibody in their serum, head kidney and liver compared to the immersion vaccine group and control, with the OrV group maintaining higher antibody levels post-immersion and injection challenge. In mucosal tissues, the ImV group elicited stronger IgM responses in the gills and skin, whereas the OrV group enhanced antibody responses in the liver and intestine. Lysozyme and bactericidal activities varied by organ and vaccination route, indicating differential activation of innate immune defenses. Additionally, immune-related gene expression was upregulated in a tissue-specific manner, reflecting the targeted activation of adaptive and innate immune mechanisms by each vaccine type. Both vaccination strategies significantly improved survival and relative percent survival (RPS), with ImV offering stronger protection against immersion challenges, while OrV provided strong protection in systemic (injection) challenges. These findings suggest that ImV and OrV groups induced distinct immune responses in Asian seabass, with immersion vaccination primarily enhancing mucosal immunity at barrier surfaces and oral vaccination promoting systemic and intestinal mucosal immunity. The integration of both vaccination strategies could provide synergistic protection, enhancing vaccine efficacy against V. vulnificus and other pathogens, thereby optimizing disease prevention and fish health management in aquaculture settings.
浸泡和口服纳米乳剂疫苗对亚洲鲈鱼(Lates calcarifer Bloch, 1790)对创伤弧菌的免疫反应和保护作用的评价
疫苗接种是水产养殖中增强抗病性和确保养殖鱼的健康和生产力的重要策略。本研究研究了包埋创伤弧菌的亚洲海鲈(Lates calcarifer)浸入式(ImV)和口服(OrV)纳米乳剂疫苗引起的不同的全身和粘膜免疫反应。采用ImV和OrV两种疫苗接种方法对不同组的亚洲鲈鱼进行免疫接种,然后分别通过浸泡和腹腔注射的方式对创伤弧菌进行攻毒。通过测量特异性IgM抗体、溶菌酶活性、杀菌活性和免疫相关基因在多个器官中的表达来评估免疫反应,包括血清、头肾、肝、鳃、皮肤和肠道。结果表明,与浸泡疫苗组和对照组相比,OrV组血清、头肾和肝脏中特异性IgM抗体水平显著升高,且浸泡和注射攻毒后OrV组仍保持较高的抗体水平。在粘膜组织中,ImV组在鳃和皮肤中引发了更强的IgM反应,而OrV组在肝脏和肠道中增强了抗体反应。溶菌酶和杀菌活性因器官和接种途径的不同而不同,表明先天免疫防御的不同激活。此外,免疫相关基因表达以组织特异性方式上调,反映了每种疫苗类型对适应性和先天免疫机制的靶向激活。两种疫苗接种策略都显著提高了存活率和相对存活率(RPS),其中ImV对浸泡挑战提供了更强的保护,而OrV对全身(注射)挑战提供了更强的保护。这些结果表明,ImV和OrV组在亚洲鲈鱼中诱导了不同的免疫反应,浸泡接种主要增强屏障表面的粘膜免疫,口服接种促进全身和肠道粘膜免疫。两种疫苗接种策略的整合可以提供协同保护,增强疫苗对创伤弧菌和其他病原体的效力,从而优化水产养殖环境中的疾病预防和鱼类健康管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fish & shellfish immunology
Fish & shellfish immunology 农林科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
19.10%
发文量
750
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Fish and Shellfish Immunology rapidly publishes high-quality, peer-refereed contributions in the expanding fields of fish and shellfish immunology. It presents studies on the basic mechanisms of both the specific and non-specific defense systems, the cells, tissues, and humoral factors involved, their dependence on environmental and intrinsic factors, response to pathogens, response to vaccination, and applied studies on the development of specific vaccines for use in the aquaculture industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信