Sharonda M. Lovett , Lauren A. Wise , Jasmine Abrams , Amelia K. Wesselink , Erika L. Sabbath , Ruth J. Geller , Chad M. Coleman , Andrea S. Kuriyama , Molly N. Hoffman , U. Vivian Ukah , Renée Boynton-Jarrett , Collette N. Ncube
{"title":"Experiences of discrimination across the life course among pregnancy planners in the United States and Canada","authors":"Sharonda M. Lovett , Lauren A. Wise , Jasmine Abrams , Amelia K. Wesselink , Erika L. Sabbath , Ruth J. Geller , Chad M. Coleman , Andrea S. Kuriyama , Molly N. Hoffman , U. Vivian Ukah , Renée Boynton-Jarrett , Collette N. Ncube","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Little is known about discrimination among pregnancy planners. We used questionnaire data from Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO), a preconception cohort study, to characterize experiences, attributions, and responses to discrimination (n = 10,460). Eligible participants were assigned female at birth, aged 21–45 years, U.S. or Canadian residents, and not using contraception or fertility treatment. Participants completed a supplemental questionnaire (2013–2024) that included the Philadelphia Urban ACE Survey, Williams' Everyday Discrimination and Major Experiences of Discrimination scales, and Krieger's instrument on responses to discrimination. Mean age at enrollment was 30.9 years. Overall, 83.8 % of participants identified as non-Hispanic White, and 50.4 % had ≥17 years education. Discrimination across the life course varied: 11 % of participants reported childhood racial discrimination, 80.3 % reported ever experiencing everyday discrimination, and 47.2 % reported ever experiencing lifetime discrimination. The most prevalent types of everyday discrimination included being perceived as not smart (63.4 %) and being treated with disrespect (62.6 %), while job-related discrimination was the most frequently-reported lifetime experience (33.9 %). Most Black participants (non-Hispanic and Hispanic) reported their race or ethnicity as one of the main reasons they were discriminated against (87.7 % and 80 %, respectively), while sex or gender was most commonly-reported by other racial and ethnic groups (range: 75.9–82.4 %). Most participants responded passively to discrimination: keeping it to themselves and accepting it as a fact of life (37.4 %). All participants other than non-Hispanic White reported greater exposure to discrimination across the life course, and attributions for discrimination (<em>e.g.,</em> race, gender, education, income level) varied across racial and ethnic groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47780,"journal":{"name":"Ssm-Population Health","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 101803"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ssm-Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827325000576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Little is known about discrimination among pregnancy planners. We used questionnaire data from Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO), a preconception cohort study, to characterize experiences, attributions, and responses to discrimination (n = 10,460). Eligible participants were assigned female at birth, aged 21–45 years, U.S. or Canadian residents, and not using contraception or fertility treatment. Participants completed a supplemental questionnaire (2013–2024) that included the Philadelphia Urban ACE Survey, Williams' Everyday Discrimination and Major Experiences of Discrimination scales, and Krieger's instrument on responses to discrimination. Mean age at enrollment was 30.9 years. Overall, 83.8 % of participants identified as non-Hispanic White, and 50.4 % had ≥17 years education. Discrimination across the life course varied: 11 % of participants reported childhood racial discrimination, 80.3 % reported ever experiencing everyday discrimination, and 47.2 % reported ever experiencing lifetime discrimination. The most prevalent types of everyday discrimination included being perceived as not smart (63.4 %) and being treated with disrespect (62.6 %), while job-related discrimination was the most frequently-reported lifetime experience (33.9 %). Most Black participants (non-Hispanic and Hispanic) reported their race or ethnicity as one of the main reasons they were discriminated against (87.7 % and 80 %, respectively), while sex or gender was most commonly-reported by other racial and ethnic groups (range: 75.9–82.4 %). Most participants responded passively to discrimination: keeping it to themselves and accepting it as a fact of life (37.4 %). All participants other than non-Hispanic White reported greater exposure to discrimination across the life course, and attributions for discrimination (e.g., race, gender, education, income level) varied across racial and ethnic groups.
期刊介绍:
SSM - Population Health. The new online only, open access, peer reviewed journal in all areas relating Social Science research to population health. SSM - Population Health shares the same Editors-in Chief and general approach to manuscripts as its sister journal, Social Science & Medicine. The journal takes a broad approach to the field especially welcoming interdisciplinary papers from across the Social Sciences and allied areas. SSM - Population Health offers an alternative outlet for work which might not be considered, or is classed as ''out of scope'' elsewhere, and prioritizes fast peer review and publication to the benefit of authors and readers. The journal welcomes all types of paper from traditional primary research articles, replication studies, short communications, methodological studies, instrument validation, opinion pieces, literature reviews, etc. SSM - Population Health also offers the opportunity to publish special issues or sections to reflect current interest and research in topical or developing areas. The journal fully supports authors wanting to present their research in an innovative fashion though the use of multimedia formats.